10/10 I believe, goes way deeper than most know. I am no longer convinced about the "StableCoin loop blow up" or what WS said about needing to liquidate ALTs for Clarity. I am 100% confident it was a proper attack. There's been a lot of exchanges shut down, hacks this year. I think we will see a Depeg in USDC &or USDT soonish. I would not hold your funds on Binance, especially if you were abusing the CAD/USD work around like I did for a number of months. (They will literally serve anyone for the price. Does not matter where you live.) If you want a rabbit hole to go down: USDC, AAVE Kraken, USDT TRX, , HL Circle Deal, Binance HTX ByBit vs USA. Binance is well aware of Saylor's current Liquidity situation. (I am bearish not to be a f*ggot, I am very worried about what is next to come. ) TRX has a massive debt/liquidity hole that goes to Justin Sun. Kinda odd so much USDT is on TRX now as well, compared to ETH. Idk how much I want to look into that, simply due to Finex not even listing ETH for sometime. USDT has quite the US ties including Lutnick & Hines + more. But this leaves them vulnerable. (I want to walk back my statements in prior months of being Bearish on SOL bullish TRX) I do not believe the BitGet , ByBit hacks were random. While there are some DPRK addresses in the mix for sure, there is simply no way. BitGet lowkey fucked up by alluding "Chen said a preliminary internal investigation found no insider involvement. But she could not explain how the attackers acquired their knowledge of Bitget's systems. She said the investigation remained ongoing and could take longer than Bybit's because the Bitget incident involved a more complicated set of systems. Her response leaves a central question open: how much access did the attackers have before the theft? Chen said Bitget had conducted an internal investigation and found no evidence of insider involvement at that stage. "The preliminary investigation so far is telling us there's no internal sort of involvement." "Instead, they exploited vulnerabilities in third-party software that Bitget had acquired, stole internal login credentials, and issued fake withdrawal requests. According to CEO Gracy Chen, these fraudulent orders drained the exchange's hot and warm wallets—those that operate online for quick access—while cold wallets, which remain offline, stayed secure." 😂🤭🤡 The hacker swapped into shit like ZCASH which for shit like I've been tweeting like a schizo, has Israeli & US ties lmao. Why would a DPRK entity do that? ZCASH has to be traceable, there is no fuckin way. Its the perfect industry plant. Reminds me of Emily Lai (Who is unfortunately in HyperLiquid) I will put this warning out there, without criming myself illegally, I can 100% certify this woman has foreign ties & is NOT A GOOD ACTOR behind close doors if you are interested. And she does not do a good job of hiding it. @HyperliquidX @chameleon_jeff I would fire this woman tomorrow morning if I was a CEO, and go thru a massive internal restructure in terms of security & employee's. I also think it's ironic after the CZ public shaming interview, Binance listed Hype, the competitor they attacked onchain. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. "In Crypto when your asset/token gets listed, traded on an exchange, you no longer control the price or PA." - CB Quant 2024 (in the 2021-2022 deposition) *Insert BigTrout's Invisible Wall here theory* $WhiteWhale solana:7GCihgDB8fe6KNjn2MYtkzZcRjQy3t9GHdC8uHYmW2hr $Pnut (Feel free to see what was happening when prices stalled out at very specific price points. Especially on the $1.4-2.8B tops in Memecoins on SOL) Ostium. Days before hand, they were reaching out to many many USA, Canadian citizens like me, asking for partnerships, badges, etc. Wanting deposits. She leaves Ostium on LinkedIn in September. But stays at HYPE. HYPE just OTC'd a bunch to a "Institutional buyer" while US based MultiCoin is de-risking. I really hope this is a proper US INST or Nasdaq that bought these, and not offshore. (I like HL a lot. But I am quite worried if a black swan destabilizing event happened how there automatic functions would be. IE Market Makers, previous attacks finding loopholes.) Then BOOM. Funds = Gone. Asking people to sign NDAs (which involves full names & addresses) to reveal what happened. Kinda sus. Where I think this targetting comes from is lowkey US & other cheap entities lending out workers/support leaking NA customers INFO, then customers being tracked down / targetted. @coinbase 👀 BitMex, AscendEX, EXMO, & BitMart were huge spots to launder, commit fraud/crime and walk away as offshore entities with no repercussions. The Chinese/Iranian LOVE Vancouver Bitcoin entities as places to launder as well. Ironic, cuz CZ is from Vancouver. & Canadian Authorities are very lazy. They don't even bat a fucking eye. I was targeted by a rogue @ByBit employee in 2025, who laundered $20,000-30,000 from me thru their exchange. Then ByBit reached out asking me for a partnership. LOL. When I asked them to look into it? radio silence. Not a fucking reply. Hh6G8e4RZQkMEqP8X8xe17FT4cDUJQVAvgFspNujTRi9 3x4okXwZHvuRLMWkoB69zczbfvbjiYkZK1raTByHutAw Cimwyaf3EoTg8aV2mWjxQLv6kRjRnbxbkN7H5yREeBqd 5TsNXekJ1ghaeyjNnY7b7k6Z6zzsAfk1itjAEs92dYFX 7MpbsFBsdmgoHd19CoGaeTwnMW6usoZnyw5KtrhhrJbj A53vSMEdgUwnnbBUUHejc3XicxYuMhJMTMQRzy1qufza EJmiUJ2rbh1v8iYtweEmU9j5NxW7T3GA1tB54zHhckpG It's quite the rabbit hole & if you are a forensic, chain analyst, it's quite the crazy shit go find. Another crazy one is how much $$$ & USTs went missing in the Cayman's & British Islands. Someone really smart should go look at the entities behind this & who they're tied to / which financial intuitions align with offshore crypto! BT C.O.300