This article seems surprisingly bad? Most of the arguments are like confused strawmen or plain incoherent and self defeating. One of his first examples describes a student having to draw a 1 dollar bill from memory and then with the bill for reference next to her. He then argues that because she did a much better job with the reference next to her that shows we don't store memories like he imagines computers do I guess. What he actually observes tho is that visual memory in humans is very lossy, but that also literally shows something is being stored nonetheless, because otherwise the person wouldnt be able to draw anything at all. This is just self defeating for his point that our brains don't store information. He tries to say this is somehow different because "her brain was changed in a way that allowed her to visualise a dollar bill", but her brain being changed to enable the recollection of information, even if very lossy, is just what we mean by storage. His 2nd baseball example is even more weird, he says that believing the brain processes information means you have to believe baseball players use some very particular method using an internal model of physics to track a falling ball, but in fact baseball players use a method which he says "is actually incredibly simple, and completely free of computations, representations and algorithms". How is this other method "completely free of computations, representations and algorithms" doesn't make any sense and he just asserts it? The method he is describing does in fact read very much like an algorithm you could actually encode in a robot today. This just reads so incredibly confused and is self defeating in such an obvious way. I feel like whoever wrote this is trying to argue against a weird strawman of someone that assumes the human brain is 1-1 as a desktop computer running Windows and executing programs with very simple and clear inputs / outputs and lossless memory, which no person believes. I am guessing the point of this is to try and present counters in the recent debate over whether AI models have experiences or not, but if that's your goal sharing stuff that is this obviously wrong is not gonna achieve anything.