SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept) header
SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept) profile picture

Facts, in #science, are explained by theories. BSc. in #Evolution-ary Biology. Science teacher. #Atheist since birth. #Veteran

United States
Joined March 2009
Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)Photo by SciP(h)er (@ScientiaPercept)
SciP(h)er retweeted
Lol
50
229
9
1,454
15,524
Lucky for you we’re more tolerant of absurdities. That said, while some of her stuff I disagree with or find ridiculous, it’s still far less inane than most of your crap.
2
1
1
47
Which means he didn’t fulfill them as the messiah was supposed to do. Congratulations on playing yourself.
1
1
14
SciP(h)er retweeted
Then why was there a need for plate movement to explain away the problem of enough water to cover Earth's tallest mountains? You're trying to explain away a physics problem by proposing God dealt with a different physics problem.
1
4
19
Your commandments aren’t my problem. Your religion is blasphemy to hundreds of gods so, I’m not too fucking concerned.
1
17
There you go making assumptions out of your intentional ignorance. Again. As usual.
1
16
Admitting your solution is magic only makes your god look weaker. A child could figure out a god so powerful, he could have reset humanity without killing anyone & with no more violation of free will than the flood myth. Just more evidence who creates/whoreships such a god.
1
1
18
Funnier, he doesn’t understand how idiotic he makes his god look.
1
2
15
Oh, it’s worse than that. He has to accept those axioms before his faith claims (he labels “presuppositions” to hide their actual value) about god. Otherwise he falls into solipsism.
1
1
29
SciP(h)er retweeted
You think you know reality exists and what is true about it because god exists but you don't know god exists. Your belief no matter how closely held is not knowledge of God's existence. Without evidence of existence first none of your presuppositions are valid.
1
1
2
19
Choose one that you think is impossible for me to tear apart. Will it be Isaiah 53? Micah 5 2? How about Zechariah 9 9? It's nearly Christmas......we could do Isaiah 7 14.....
2
29
So choose one and I'll tell you why it wasn't fulfilled. That you didn't indicates your level of fear, because you know I'm right.
1
1
2
29
You seem to be floundering at ever turn. Has the holy spirit abandoned you? nitter.cf/ScientiaPercept/status…
I'm still wondering if you're going to provide evidence for Noachian flood happening worldwide around 4400 years ago.
1
2
27
Notice how you avoided replying to this tweet? Clearly, you have no valid reason to believe the Bible. So on that point, we agree. nitter.cf/YTGGFI/status/21181695…
NOPE! All I'm asking is WHY I should believe the Bible. And if your answer starts with "The Bible says...", you clearly don't understand the question, or you have no reason to believe it either.
4
28
SciP(h)er retweeted
Why do you think it is a contradiction? Define contradiction.
1
1
28