Scotty retweeted
It’s only my opinion, but I think this is the best comedy series that has ever been written . Will never be matched . #fawltytowers
Scotty retweeted
Give Tommy Robinson a listen and on Nov 3rd vote accordingly
Rioters in France are screaming we can kill them all in the name of Allah, that's what happens when you open your borders
To all Americans this is coming your way
You suck if you're thinking of sitting this one out
Scotty retweeted
“I'm not voting for anyone who thinks the wrong side won the Cold War.”
Watch Bill Maher absolutely decimate the Democrat Socialists of America, and their takeover of the Democratic Party.
Bill seems to be the only liberal willing to fight the necessary intra-party conflict in the Democratic Party. Republicans have been fighting our own version of this civil war, but *at least we are fighting it*. The problem with Democrats is that they are happily letting their craziest factions take control, without a fight.
Scotty retweeted
"I've never seen a Government so hated, so mistrusted and that's hurst so many people. London is not safe!"
Former police officer Norman Brennan says that when it comes to crime, "Britain is broken".
Scotty retweeted
The pre cursor to repeating Lebanon's history.
nitter.cf/realMaalouf/status/187…
This is how Lebanon went from being a prosperous Christian country to being destroyed by Islamists. Pay close attention!
“As Christians, we opened our doors to Muslims, and welcomed them into our country. We wanted to be inclusive and even made them part of the government.
But due to having several wives and many children, Muslims became the majority.
Once they were the majority, they thought they could do whatever they wanted, and began massacring the Christians who welcomed them.”
Scotty retweeted
If you look at the last two years, it's clear President Trump is preparing for something big.
He's securing permanent security control over Greenland, kicked China out of the Panama Canal, and locked up 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil. For 25 years, China quietly bought up our backyard to gain a strategic stranglehold on our side of the globe. In just 20 months, Trump pulled the rug right out from under them.
While the rest of the world fractures, Trump is building a completely self-sufficient Western Hemisphere. One where America controls its own destiny without bowing to Beijing or Tehran.
Scotty retweeted
This is one of the best and most moving political ads I have ever seen.
New York... Vote BLAKEMAN for Governor this November.
There are tons of 9/11 families in NY who feel this way. This type of pain doesn't fade. These kinds of wounds never fully heal.
Do it for them.
Scotty retweeted
Anthropic's alignment lead says there’s a 10% chance of AI causing human extinction. The problem is not just misuse, but lack of control. Bluntly, our government has been asleep and is out of touch. Here are 5 things we must do:
✅ Establish a federal agency like we have for nuclear power and airplanes
✅ Require pre-certification for containment, including kill switches and human permission for rewriting
✅ Liability for agentic AI on the open network & mandatory insurance
✅ Criminal penalties for the release of models without certification
✅ Oversight hearings with researchers like Jacob to understand dangers, and whistleblower protections for all AI engineers/researchers
We also urgently need to reach an agreement with China on standards for safety, containment, and liability so we do not have a race that is devastating for humanity.
It is time now to put humanity's safety before the profits of tech lords.
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.
Scotty retweeted
Kimmel is not getting canceled because Trump can’t take a joke it’s because he BECAME ONE:
Scotty retweeted
As my mother likes to say: "One cannot hide rotten fish for long. The more you postpone cleaning it out, the more unbearable the stench becomes. Soon, the stench will go beyond your house, to the neighbours' house and they will come knocking on your door for answers".
This is what the "Harry situation" is for the RF, a rotten fish they refused to clean out and now, the stench has pervaded the entire neighborhood. Trump is one of the numerous neighbours who are tired of smelling it🤭
In response to GBnews questions about the Sussex and their return to the UK, the US President replied with his typical bluntness:
"I thought they treated the royal family with great disrespect. I didn't like it. I didn't like the way she [Meghan] acted. I thought she was terribly disrespectful to the Queen, to King Charles."
"You know, he [Harry] wrote a book that was very terrible to William. It was terrible, the things he said.. I would not have taken them back. I would've never spoken to them again."🔥
Strong cutting words but words that echo how the general public feels about his entire drama.
But the true irony of this interview is this: If someone should have had the most unstable family life, with children fighting it out in public, writing books and giving interviews to insult each other and their father, it should have been Trump's children.
Here is a man who is known for his headstrong and volatile personality and who has 5 children from 3 different wives. Truly, his personality and his family situation should have been the perfect setting for family drama and instability.
AND YET. There is more unity and stability in Trump's family of 5 children from 3 different marriages, than there is in KC's family of 2 sons from the same mother🤔
None of Trump's 5 children have ever aired any dirty family laundry in public, have ever attacked each other nor have they ever written any books insulting each other or their father.
On the countrary, they display a brotherly and family unity between siblings who, despite having different mothers, share the same blood through their father👌🏽
This "unity" is not happenstance. It is because the common denominator, the Father figure, has authority over his household and made sure that there is respect and unity among his children🔥
Therefore, Trump did not even need to tell us that he would never tolerate the disrespect H&M dished on the RF, we know that his children and their respective spouses KNOW BETTER than to pull any public stunts on him; he would wash them out publicly too, at 4am 😭
Thus, the hard reality in hearing the President come to the defense of William, as KC has never done besides, is that If William and Harry were Trump's sons, Harry would NEVER have gotten away with writing "Spare", nor attacking the RF with the vulgarity and malice that he did in the past 6 years.
If Harry were Trump's son, he would never have turned to be the useless, do-nothing brat he is today, announcing at 42 years old that his plans for the next 12-15 years is to be an unemployed stay-at-home dad🤦🏽♀️
All of Trump's 5 children have been raised to be entrepreneurs despite having a wealthy billionaire, as a father. None of them is beating their chest like Harry, crying that they are entitled to privileges because they are their "father's children". They simply know better👌🏽
So truly, this "Harry situation" has exposed KC's shortcomings not just as a King but even more so as a father; and that is what Trump hinted at, in a not-so-subtle way.
Leadership and fatherhood actually walk hand in hand. They do not oppose each other.
A strong leader lives by principles and values that he applies. He is not afraid to take the tough decisions when the time calls for it, and stand his ground against backlash.
In the same way, a good Father teaches his son, right from wrong. If the son choses right, he rewards him. But if the son choses wrong, then the good Father discipline the son with consequences so that the son can learn from his mistake and change his ways🔥
At the other hand of the spectrum is the inadequate father, who enables his son in his reckless ways by shielding him from any consequences and never disciplining him when he choses wrong from right. In so doing, that father actually leads his own son to his ruin and destruction.
Similarly, a poor leader will always be apologetic and consistently finding excuses as to why his hands are always tied and he cannot take any tough decisions. It is the very nature of Weak leaders to always justify their shortcomings to the public🤷🏽♀️
Well and so my dears, there is no paradox between Leadership and Parenthood, between being a President or a King and being a Father. The greatest school of Leadership in Life is Parenthood☕️
Scotty retweeted
Harry and Meghan Markle Cannot Be Outside the Institution and Inside Its Titles
There comes a point where family and the institution of the Crown have to be treated as two different things.
Harry and Meghan have already made that distinction. In 2020 they left royal duties. The Palace stated they would no longer be working members of the Royal Family and would not use their HRH styles. In 2021 their patronages and honorary military appointments were returned. They are free to have a private relationship with individual members of their family. That is not the question.
The question is why the Crown should continue lending its institutional identity to two people who chose to operate permanently outside the institution while retaining the titles that identify them as members of it.
A royal title is not a surname. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were created by the Sovereign. Harry’s princely status and the Sussex dukedom are titles conferred through the Crown. The official royal website still presents them as Duke and Duchess of Sussex while recording that they are no longer working members. That is institutional ambiguity.
You cannot leave the institution, build a commercial identity independent of it, speak publicly about it, and continue to present yourself through titles whose entire value derives from connection to it.
In 2025 the King began the formal process of removing Prince Andrew’s princely title and HRH style and had the Dukedom of York struck from the Roll of the Peerage. Parliament’s own briefing confirms that royal styles can be withdrawn through the Crown’s prerogative and that Parliament can legislate in relation to hereditary peerages. The claim that nothing can be done is false. There are mechanisms and there is precedent.
The monarchy survives by keeping a clear line between those who serve the Crown and those who do not. If leaving royal service carries no institutional consequence beyond the loss of a few duties, while the titles remain available as personal brands, the title stops being a marker of service and becomes inherited commercial capital. That cannot hold.
Harry should lose the princely title and the Sussex dukedom through the proper constitutional and parliamentary routes. Meghan should cease to hold the derived Duchess title. They should have no royal patronages, no military affiliations, no ceremonial role, no representation of the Crown, and no official platform. The separation should be permanent.
This is not about stopping a son from seeing his father or relatives from attending a private occasion. It is about ending the grey area.
If they want an independent life, they should have one — under their own names. The Crown should not simultaneously supply the hereditary title and royal association that make that independent brand valuable.
Half-measures have run their course: not working royals, but still royal; not using HRH, but retaining it; left the institution, but still identified with it. The Crown does not need to fight them or answer them. It needs to define the boundary.
Family can remain family. The institution must be institutionally separate. If the monarchy expects the public to understand that distinction, it has to enforce it.
The question is no longer whether they deserve the titles. It is whether the Crown can continue allowing titles created by the Sovereign to be used indefinitely by people who have chosen not to participate in the institution those titles represent.
The answer is no.
Scotty retweeted
Charles’s Real Legacy: Leaving William a Monarchy Without the Sussex Chaos
Harry and Meghan are a liability the institution tolerated for far too long.
They took the titles, the privileges, the global platform and the deference that comes with being born—or marrying—into the House of Windsor, then walked away when the constraints of royal duty no longer suited them. After that, they spent years monetising the wreckage: Oprah, Netflix, Spare, the endless victim narrative. They portrayed the family as cold, racist and conspiratorial while living in Montecito luxury and signing deals worth tens of millions. At some point, “speaking your truth” becomes a very lucrative business model.
The monarchy is not a family therapy practice. It is a constitutional institution that survives on dignity, continuity and public confidence. Harry and Meghan treated it as content. Every interview, every book chapter and every documentary that painted Charles as weak, William as cruel, Camilla as calculating and the Palace as a dysfunctional, racist machine chipped away at the institution’s credibility. You cannot spend years telling the world that the Firm is broken and then expect to be welcomed back as private-but-still-royal neighbours without consequences.
Charles’s job is not to play grandfather first. His job is to protect the Crown so that William inherits an institution that still functions.
Charles cannot afford to approach this primarily as a father or grandfather. If he wants to put being Harry’s father and his grandchildren’s grandfather above being King, then perhaps he should retire and hand the Crown to William. Because the moment he chose to wear the Crown, his personal feelings stopped being the institution’s priority.
The King’s responsibility is not to keep every member of his family happy. It is to protect the institution and leave it in the strongest possible position for his successor.
And that successor is William.
