Sam retweeted
Thereās a constant narrative that matchgoers need to "do more." But look at the sheer numbers: the club boasts a global fanbase of anywhere between 600 million and 1.1 billion people.
Even taking the conservative 600m figure, the roughly 37,000 core matchgoers in the ground represent just 0.006% of our total support.
Asking 0.006% of the fanbase to carry the entire weight of a protest movement makes no sense. The reality is that the global fanbase holds far more leverage than the few through the turnstiles; your collective voice and digital reach can amplify our message louder than anything we can do alone. If we bring the Green & Gold back inside the ground, we need you to back us from outside, not turn against us. We fight this together or not at all.
Whether you personally back the Green & Gold movement or not, it remains the most visible, realistic protest we have. It doesnāt risk anyone's season ticket or livelihood like a walkout does, making it something far more matchgoers can actually get behind inside the ground.
Tell everyone to take Green & Gold balloons to every game, wear Green & Gold scarves - think how that looks in the stadium - remember AC Milan?
I'll repeat what I said in my last post: imagine what a difference we make as a collective.
- Hit the vanity metrics: Unfollow the club's official accounts on X, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. The club pitches these raw follower numbers to prospective commercial partners every day.
- Direct consumer feedback to commercial partners: Brands invest heavily for positive sentiment. When supporters collectively make it clear across sponsor channels that partnering with negligent ownership carries a reputational cost, commercial teams take notice.
- Starve the Megastore: Stop buying official kits, training apparel, and club subscriptions. If you want United gear, buy retro or support independent fan-made apparel.
- Back fan-led advocacy: Support independent fan media, fanzines, and the Supporters Trust. Collective, legal, and political pressure moves the needle; reckless armchair advice does not.
Do you see what you alone can achieve, work with us, not against us.
I hear plenty of noise online about what matchgoers āoughtā to do to force change, most notably demands that we leave Old Trafford empty or throw missiles onto the pitch to stop games.
If you donāt attend games regularly, itās easy to look at things from a distance and assume itās simply a matter of willpower. Here is the reality on the ground:
1. The āBoycott / Empty Seatsā Myth
- The money is already banked: Around 46,000 seats belong to Season Ticket holders who pay in advance in May and Juneābefore the previous season has even finished. Whether an ST holder sits in that seat or stays home, the Glazers already have the cash.
- Season ticket holders donāt control the stadium: If, on average, 20% of Season Ticket Holders forward or resell through official channels, youāre left with roughly half the stadiumās capacity. The remaining half of the capacity is filled by hospitality and general members paying premium prices, people who arenāt walking out or boycotting.
- Strict attendance enforcement: Season Ticket holders must physically attend or officially transfer at least 16 out of 19 Premier League home matches. If you fail to hit that threshold, the club revokes your ticket for the following season.
- You donāt create an empty stadiumāyou create a corporate one: With over 100,000 people on the waiting list and massive international tourism demand, any seat permanently vacated isnāt left empty. The club simply reclaims it and flips it into extortionate single-match membership prices or hospitality packages.
- The European comparison doesnāt work: Pointing to Serie A or the Bundesliga ignores the fundamental economics. Many of those clubs have cheap tickets, standing sections, and 50+1 fan ownership models. Old Trafford operates in a hyper-commercialised, sold-out market. Asking a local supporter to sacrifice a seat their family has held for 20, 30, or 40 years, only for it to be sold to a tourist five minutes later, gives the owners zero financial leverage.
2. Throwing Objects onto the Pitch
- Itās a specific criminal offence: Under the Football (Offences) Act 1991, throwing any missile onto the pitch or surrounding area is illegal.
- It ruins lives, not ownership: Old Trafford is blanketed by modern high-definition CCTV and facial recognition. Anyone caught doesnāt just face a club ban; they face mandatory court-issued Football Banning Orders (FBOs), the surrender of their passport during European fixtures, a criminal record, and potential loss of employment. Furthermore, with modern automated flagging and blanket ticketing investigations, which have been very poor on Unitedās part, when disorder breaks out, bystanders and innocent people nearby often get swept up in the fallout, losing access to tickets while lengthy club appeals grind on.
- Demanding that local matchgoers take on criminal records and jeopardise their livelihoods while you watch in a pub, on TV, or via an illegal stream isnāt a protest strategy; itās completely detached from reality.
What Non-Matchgoers Can ACTUALLY Do to Hit the Model: The clubās ownership model is built on one thing: commercial monetisation of the global audience. That is where you have direct leverage.
- Hit the vanity metrics: Unfollow the club's official accounts on X, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. The club pitches these raw follower numbers to prospective commercial partners every day.
- Direct consumer feedback to commercial partners: Brands invest heavily for positive sentiment. When supporters collectively make it clear across sponsor channels that partnering with negligent ownership carries a reputational cost, commercial teams take notice.
- Starve the Megastore: Stop buying official kits, training apparel, and club subscriptions. If you want United gear, buy retro or support independent fan-made apparel.
- Back fan-led advocacy: Support independent fan media, fanzines, and the Supporters Trust. Collective, legal, and political pressure moves the needle; reckless armchair advice does not.
If we want change, it requires collective discipline across the entire fanbaseānot asking matchgoers to commit financial or legal suicide just to make a 30-second point on television.
Thereās no divide here: it isnāt matchgoers versus non-matchgoers; itās all of us. If we arenāt united, we achieve nothing, and that failure rests on every single Manchester United supporter.
A better-formatted version of this post is here: cheesesofnazareth.substack.cā¦
Sam retweeted
Congratulations on an incredible international career, @Cristiano ššµš¹
Enjoy your retirement ā¤ļø
Sam retweeted
You could see how much representing Manchester United meant to Shea Lacey ā and how much an exciting, 19-year-old home-grown winger who plays for the shirt means to the fans. Lacey embodies what United should be about. Fearlessness, width and academy-nurtured. Positive, quick and tenacious (boxing genes). Got an assist v Roma (clever, firm pass to Cunha), could have had a penalty, helped out at right-back. Should he start v Aston Villa on Sunday? Maybe heāll have a greater impact still off the bench, still learning, canāt heap too much pressure on Lacey, but certainly get him on earlier than 75 mins. #MUFC
Sam retweeted
Peak Cunha experience today. In every way possible. It doesn't get any better. Wins a weird penalty, brace, sent off. Everything you can ask for.
Playing Roma in Europe will always bring back memories of the 7-1. Still remains my favourite European night at Old Trafford.
Back then we were one of the best teams in Europe. The mediocre rabble we have now are a million miles off that level.
Sam retweeted
ineos have thrown away 9 points because they were underprepared. forget which manager united should get next, we are run by people throwing away football games due to incompetence. carrick has a 15.38% win percentage this season. business as usual! do you know how crazy this is?
They hired a very inexperienced manager but did no planning on what to do if he failed. So now they donāt have a clue what to do next, theyāre terrified of getting it wrong again and nobody is brave to make a decision. Incompetence on every level.
Michael Carrick is expected to be in charge when #MUFC host Roma on Tuesday. Board unlikely to make a change this side of the international break now and some senior figures believe he can still turn dire form around. More on @talkSPORT.com shortly.
Sam retweeted
The 2005 leveraged Man United takeover made the club an empty husk, bled dry by vulture capitalists. Becoming the weekly butt of everyone else's joke was accelerated by the equally hopeless INEOS-led front. Until that changes, anything else is rearranging the Titanic deck chairs.
Sam retweeted
It will surprise nobody who is bottom of this list and by hundreds of millions of pounds.
The shambles of recruitment at certain clubs revealed in latest report by the always excellent @CIES_Football who have calculated the appreciation or decrease in player signings since they joined their clubs (excludes academy players).
On good thing about this sorry situation is that itās finally put the spotlight on how badly run our club is.
Iāve not seen English media tearing into the owners/senior leadership to this extent before. They canāt hide this time. Time to be accountable for their mistakes.
Sam retweeted
āMichael Carrick will be given time to turn things aroundā and āthe hierarchy do not want to rush next stepsā should be read and digested for what it really is: an indecisive club without any succession planning or contingencies because it doesnāt have clarity of identity in the first place. A club that often takes the cheap instead of the smart or right route because of the crippling Glazer debt, plus decision-makers who are never aligned - except in their own self-preservation. And it ends up costing more.
It explains the chaotic nature of lurching from one coaching philosophy to its extreme, to revisiting candidates that were on the agenda - some as far back as 2019 - that were already ruled out, to having a shortlist of options with nothing in common to take over a mishmash team that has suffered from horrid squad planning; both in incomings and exits.
Blame the players, blame the name in the dugout while the people who brought them to Manchester United, kept them, created the absolute opposite of a culture of excellence are allowed to rinse and repeat.
Sam retweeted
Keeping Carrick because you believe in him is one thing. Keeping him there while actively looking for his replacement is another.
How can you expect him to lead the club while you're working behind his back to replace him? And then talk about respect, standards and doing things the right way?
A disgusting way to treat an iconic figure in United's history.
The hypocrisy is staggering. Gross incompetence from those running the club.
Are the club aware there is a very realistic chance that we are in the relegation zone this weekend?
The lack of urgency to act is absolutely staggering. Nobody has the confidence to make a decision.
Crunch talks are ongoing over Michael Carrickās future, with Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Joel and Avram Glazer, Berrada and Wilcox involved.
But all indications are that no final decision has been taken and so he continues [@lauriewhitwell]































