@SimulatedSpace
Earth
Joined July 2015
I never saw this energy from the Premier League for Chelsea’s SEVENTY FIVE charges. I thought they just want fairness? Hmm.
22
Soriano said the Panel is bias and we will expose them and the Premier League + pursue damages on media outlets damaging our name The legal attack City are about to unleash will be equivalent to Sterling, Aguero and Sané. Nobody is safe.
50
Premier league marking their own homework doesn’t convince me of anything. I want a real court to hear the evidence and tell me an outcome. Until that day, it’s just noise.
45
Plenty of innocent people go to prison for crimes they didn’t commit Close your mouths until the full legal defence has ended. If there’s one thing City do, it’s WIN.
38
There’s a reason the Premier League blocks CAS. It’s because they will call bullshit on their kangaroo courts City will not rest, lie down and give a false plea We are innocent and have the means to clear our name. Repercussions are coming. Rivals enjoy this while it lasts.
31
UEFA found us guilty of UEFA charges. CAS cleared us PL found us guilty of PL charges. High Court will do what CAS did last time. Provide a truly independent and unbiased setting to hear the evidence You cannot trust the football bodies to fairly hear evidence against them
29
Back your fucking club. Support is not just for on the pitch. 🩵 Ferran and Khaldoon say we are innocent. Ok let’s go 🤺
85
🩵 retweeted
A message sent to #ManCity staff by CEO, Ferran Soriano.
153
647
112
6,904
308,122
Listen to What Ferran Soriano 🩵🩵
3
7
1
71
2,963
Breaking News - Premier League panel rules in favour of Premier league
1
276
🚨 OFFICIAL: Manchester City statement. “Manchester City FC is both disappointed and surprised by the opinion of the Premier League Commission, that has been published today. The Club is innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League and a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists in support of all of its positions, relating to this case. The Club will therefore be relentless, and where necessary proactive, in any and all appropriate regulatory and legal forums.  The Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements uncompleted. Manchester City FC will now pursue the appeal avenues open to it, on the basis that the opinion contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe.  The Club has diligently respected due process for eight years on the basis that the Premier League Board and Executive would behave as an independent, impartial and fair-minded regulator, free from partisan influence.   The Club is obviously restricted in what it can say further until all future proceedings are complete”.
2,229
2,814
1,090
29,474
4,256,488
Remember this isn’t an independent panel. It’s a premier league appointed kangaroo court 🦘
18
6
1
178
5,581
I’m still believing City. Maybe it’s blind loyalty but I can see what the Premier League’s intention and belief is all along. They could have all the evidence to the contrary but will not change their mind or determination to remove us from their red mistresses’ path
200
I actually think the level the PL has gone at City shows how fucking bias they are. They are way too certain of things that can’t be proven easily. They have a venom in their wording like they are hellbent on proving every charge without any legal doubt In a proper court. We win
60
3
1
91
9,697
AI giving copium
42
It was a witch hunt. The trial was a waste of time. The PL and media have labelled us guilty since our first trophy Lord Pannick needs to show everything to the High Court and dismantle this corrupt league PL won the battle. City must win the war
65
17
6
257
13,685
City clear think its bias and partisan influence leading these guilty verdicts. They called us frauds with sham contracts Now we have to prove it’s them who are frauds with sham panels and legal process Clearly the PL appeal is a waste of time It’s high court or League 2
53
Irrefutable seems a bit extreme lads 😂
24
Ahh well, I assume we just get a slapped wrist like Chelsea for their 75 charges? Right? RIGHT?!
29
TWO YEARS when there was seemingly no doubt and they emphatically think it’s all fraudulent Hmmmmmm
17