Unpopular opinion -- I don't think we should accept papers in top AI conferences whose contribution is mainly experimental but don't provide the data and tools to reproduce the experiments. I have seen several papers with flawed results, but without code there's no way of telling
“Among articles stating that data was available upon request, only 17% shared data upon request.”
8
6
2
70
5,763
I don't think this is unpopular. If it is, it shouldn't be.

Jan 15, 2026 · 2:02 PM UTC

3
101