Steel 📜 (@Steel1901) header
Steel 📜 (@Steel1901) profile picture

Intellectual Shonen Meathead | 20 | dork that I'll marry: @violetFlash | Bestie: @FrisoLaxod | Tambien Hablo Español |🦚| Wait for your turn

???, The house of Spiders
Joined May 2020
Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)Photo by Steel 📜 (@Steel1901)
tengan cuidado la gente con esta bandera son pederastas que la usan para reconocerse entre si favor de difundir
126
1,437
93
7,095
236,913
Gringos really think the third world is a separate reality lol
You don’t understand because you’re from a place that is entirely irrelevant to the discussion
1
1
5
501
Steel 📜 retweeted
THIS IS WHAT GRINGOS ACTUALLY BELIEVE
They’re dead. Everyone with a serious food allergy in third world countries is dead long before their fifth birthday.
65
1,437
13
32,056
316,626
I really don't understand why guys, the puported stoic and controleld gender, cannot handle the most basic of angst which is unrequieted love, and then find it impossible to like a girl for being like a person. TBH this is prolly the reason true male friendship is dying.
"Men & women can't be friends," episode #4,038 Women think "there's no romantic interest" because THEY find utility in the relationship by simply having a man around. He spends time with her, he listens to her, he provides emotional support, they do things together, and she finds this gratifying on its own without any of the obligations of acting like a girlfriend or wife. The man, on the other hand, DOES NOT WORK THIS WAY and will interpret private time with a woman as her being interested in him whether she is or not. The complications between men and women that come with trying to be "just friends" are almost never worth it. Men, save yourselves the trouble, do not "be friends" with women. This will be the outcome. And yes, I did watch the video, it's all the usual retarded excuse-making. There is no other logical outcome to this. But, putting the video aside, there's no way for us to know what kind of things they did together or what would have given him the impression that they could be together. I'll give you a hint though: it's never, EVER nothing. The worst thing about this is that women expect men to simply not experience emotions and natural impulses. SHE didn't want anything more than friendship (platonic, utilitarian interaction) with him, so his feelings are categorically invalid. They act as though the man has committed some kind of transgression against them for not abiding by her vision for the "friendship." You can even find women treating this as downright villainous, claiming men think they are "owed" sex or romance, as if these natural feelings are somehow intentionally nefarious acts.
17
27
5
309
59,902
Guys can't form real emotional bonds with one another it's all just fucking impulses, amoebas reacting to stimuli. Can't you have a little self control? I don't like doing the man up bit, but you guys clearly seem to think there's some merit to that machismo shit so.
2
2
44
5,404
"Man" is deeply concerned about other people finding him gay for being cloose with a man. This makes the man worried and upset. These emotions however aren't at all something the "man" must reflect upon, but society must simply stop thinking about gay people, for his feelings.
"True Male Friendship" died because it was pathologized by the mainstreaming of homosexuality. Emotionally-intimate male friendships are no longer possible without the baggage of "seeming gay." Male characters cannot be depicted in fiction as closely bonded without people interpreting them as gay. Old literature and historical texts depicting these bonds are now routinely mischaracterized by people are motivated to misread them.
4
5
10
1,023
God MRAs like these are just so castrated, constantly whining about stupid shit like this but also preaching to some past they never embody at the same time. What do you even believe in? Are all your positions derived from this shit? Amoeba reacting to stimuli.
1
2
265
I could make my greater point about friendship and romance but I don't really want to because I don't think these snowflakes could handle the simple concept of "Emotional connection of platonic and romantic nature does not perclude one or the other" because they are amoebas!
1
2
223
This really just feels like an inability to engage with yourself even if it's painful. Is there truly nothing more to your enjoyment of art than it making you feel "happy" and "motivated" like cat videos and AI generated stories of self improvement? Nothing other than kitsch?
They don’t. People like them the same way they “like” black coffee, dark chocolate and whiskey: they’re too weak willed to say the emperor’s naked and succumb to the social terrorists who threaten them with ostracism and humiliation for fun
1
107
It's also prolly bait but let' engage anyways, for funsies.
37
Stil got it.
Entire discourse is people failing semiotics 101
3
191
Entire discourse is people failing semiotics 101
Acording to japaneses, this character is *NOT* black
29
464
6
4,060
56,492
Steel 📜 retweeted
Ocarina of time remake makes botw look like a Wii U game
Breath of the Wild vs Ocarina of Time
553
995
209
21,055
463,602
I was wrong
CONTINUE, The Boy From Venus #22 🌼
3
414
A lot of people be saying this a joke skin and it partially is but I also just straight up wanna fuck his brains out in this so.
‼️NEW GAMBIT MAID SKIN REVEALED
1
53
House M.D. (Nintendo DS) OST - House DS MiniGame Urgent
7
33
222
5,566
Tengo 2 examenes mañana y no he empezado a estudiar
Casi todos sabemos larpeaaaar Pero pocos sabemos normiaaaaar Es que larpear y normiar no es igual Normiar es jugar Larpear es googleaaaar El que normea pretende conviviiiiir Y el que normea su tiempo lo daaa Y el que larpea pretende saberle Y nunca jugar, y nunca jugar +
39
793
7
4,066
41,061
People really think children are like a Tabula Rassa wherein whatever is fed onto them is passovely and unflichingly learned. A trans girl will (Generally) internalize different things than a cis guy even at 5 years old, because they both developed their "Self" at 2 years old.
Replying to @meggriffinliker
uh... if you're treated as a boy growing up, that is male socialization. no ifs ands or buts about it. I get that saying that has connotations but it's not like being transfem means youre immune to interalizing the things you're taught abt gender through the lens of "society -
6
143