Pinned Tweet
A few days ago the pope was photographed shaking the hands of a person in a Spiderman costume. I want to use this opportunity to give a few words on the issues with the media portrayal of pontifex. (1/7)
ST retweeted
Guys I felt it, I’m not even kidding.
Y’all’s prayers actually came in clutch during the last two questions.
I was really struggling to remember what I had learned then I had a eureka moment and it all came back to me.
ST retweeted
Kinda liking this Pope on this particular front.
On top of the need for ontological distinction, we need to recover the ancient understanding of art, not being only as an act of isolated individual creativity, but creativity in participation.
For too long art has devolved into entertainment, propaganda or critique. But as Aquinas says: "art imitates nature in its operations".
It is teleological, communal and fosters participation not only in the artefacts it produces, but in the interrelation of people: artists, patrons and communities which art serves.
In this era of artificial intelligence, it is becoming urgent to distinguish human art from what machines produce. There is an ontological difference, even before an aesthetic one, between art and what a machine can generate through statistical calculation based on millions of images created by others. Algorithms lack the spark of humanity. For this reason, the Church wishes to renew an alliance with artists and cultural institutions to safeguard our humanity.
This concept of opposing “idol worship” is derived more or less directly from contemporary Talmudic Judaism btw
ETH Zurich is like the last good university btw
geoffrey hinton mass-quit google in 2023 and mass-told everyone he was scared of what he built. nobody asked the right question.
not "is AI dangerous." the right question is "why does backpropagation work at all."
hinton couldn't answer it. neither could lecun. neither could sutskever when he left openai. the three founders of deep learning built a $4.6 trillion industry on an algorithm none of them could mathematically prove should work.
until last month.
a physicist at ETH zurich published a 41-page proof that backpropagation is a special case of the second law of thermodynamics. not an analogy. a derivation.
the math:
thermodynamics: dS/dt ≥ 0. entropy of a closed system never decreases.
backpropagation: dL/dt ≤ 0. loss of a trained network never increases.
one is entropy going up. the other is loss going down. they are the same equation with a sign flip.
the proof shows that gradient descent on a neural network is mathematically identical to a physical system falling toward thermal equilibrium. every weight update is a molecule finding its lowest energy state.
this is why transformers scale. this is why chinchilla scaling laws look like thermodynamic equations. this is why nobody could prove convergence guarantees - they were using the wrong field. the answer was never in computer science. it was in statistical mechanics.
now watch what this means for the frontier labs [Fig. 1] -
openai trained GPT-4 at an estimated mass-energy cost of 50,000 MWh. anthropic trained claude 3.5 at approximately 31,000 MWh. google trained gemini ultra at over 60,000 MWh.
the ETH proof predicts a theoretical minimum energy for each model's capability level. the equation:
E_min = kT × N × ln(1/ε)
k = boltzmann constant. T = operating temperature. N = parameters. ε = target loss.
GPT-4's actual energy usage: 17x above the theoretical minimum.
claude: 12x above minimum.
gemini: 23x above minimum.
anthropic is closest to the thermodynamic floor. not by accident. dario amodei has 3 physicists on the training infrastructure team. openai has zero.
the companies that understand this equation will compress 3 years of scaling into 6 months. the companies that don't will spend $10 billion on training runs that a physicist could tell them are 20x less efficient than possible.
hinton understood the gradient. he never understood the entropy.
the network doesn't learn. it cools.
save this
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The specific 41-page proof by an ETH Zurich physicist published last month does not exist. A 2025 paper explores how backpropagation emerges in physical models of neural networks: arxiv.org/abs/2503.09980 Training energy claims and the exact equivalence described are not supported by it.
ST retweeted
Our brothers and sisters in the Middle East are being slaughtered, but we find it impossible to make even the mildest defense of the Gospel at the dinner table
ST retweeted
In Guns Germs and Steel Diamond argued Europe was more advanced than native Americans because wheat is a more calorie dense crop.
He never did any calculations (a recurring theme) just asserted it. It’s of course completely false.
ST retweeted
General Protestant, Muslim, EO and pagan polemics against the Catholic faith at this point, and especially online are entirely lowres slop. "Hype moments & aura."
What the oneline Catholic apologetics needs more now is rhetorical artfulness, eloquence, and strength of character.
I’m so triggered. I lost my mother 08 months ago and I’m not coping. I can’t believe I’ll never see her again.
Life is so unfair.💔
ST retweeted
No resolution yet
I’m in serious jeopardy of losing my job.
My branch manager is going to vouch for me to the company higher-ups, but he was out of town today.
Please keep praying







































