Stu.....

Raffia Arshad becomes the UK's first female Muslim judge to wear a hijab. And the UK celebrates it as progress. A judge is supposed to be blind. Blind to religion. Blind to politics. Blind to tribe. Blind to personal belief. That is why they wear a wig. That is why they wear a robe. To say: I am not a person today. I am the law. Now you put a religious symbol on the bench and tell people to believe it doesn't matter. It always matters. If a Christian judge walked in wearing a giant cross and a "Jesus Saves" robe, the same liberals would scream bias. If a Jewish judge wore a kippah, they would ask questions. But no questions for a hijab. They say it is diversity, brave, empowerment. The courtroom is no longer neutral. A hijab represents a religious law that says a woman must cover herself to be modest. A law that in Iran, in Afghanistan, and in Saudi Arabia, is enforced with beatings and prison. You cannot celebrate a symbol of female submission in Tehran and call it female empowerment in London. You cannot have it both ways. This is not about Raffia Arshad as a person. She may be brilliant. She may be fair. But the system that celebrates her hijab more than her brain has already lost its mind. The UK is not being tolerant. The UK is being conquered by its own guilt. When Muslim-majority countries ban the Muslim Brotherhood because they know what it is, the UK protects it. When Muslim women in Iran burn their hijabs to be free, the UK puts a hijab on a judge and calls it freedom. t.me/fmazhindu