Zapata_web

Hey, I’m Zapata 👋 Web3 Ambassador & Community Builder What I do: • Promote projects through content & engagement • Support campaigns, quests & community growth • Stay active on X ,Telegram, Discord & other socials. Open to ambassador & moderator roles 🤝 Let’s build 🚀

Been a WHILE ✌️😎 Who missed me? 👀😂 Be honest, did you notice I was gone or you didn’t even realize? 😭😂 I’ve been busy saving lives 🩻🩺❤️‍🩹 But guess who’s BACK!

Respect to those who are 100x bigger but still put you on and want to see you win. That’s real.

Just tried using USDD to cover gas fees on TokenPocket and I like how simple the process feels. No need to worry about keeping a separate token just for gas. ⚡️ Definitely a useful feature for everyday on-chain transactions. #USDDonTP #USDDForGas #USDD #TokenPocket #GasBoostSeason @TokenPocket_TP @USDDecentralize @KeyPalWallet

🚨 $5,000 Reward 🔥🔥 @MineBitHQ Sprint is LIVE! ✅ 200 Winners ✅ Social Quests Only ✅ FREE to Enter Complete the quests and claim your share of the $5,000 prize pool. Ready to climb the leaderboard? 👇 zealy.io/cw/minebit/

What if it all works out?

Back on it 🥷 Being a while

I want to address the claims being made against my community, because the narrative being pushed is misleading and ignores the onboarding structure the project itself encouraged participants to follow. I taught these people about Proof of Humanity. Most are students. Most were new to crypto. I funded some from my own wallet and sent fees in batches during classes and live sessions. I walked them through registration step-by-step on calls. They registered together because I guided them together. That's what teaching looks like. The project also funds some who queue and fill the crowdfunding form. After the airdrop, I showed them how to withdraw. They withdrew almost at the same time because they learned from me at the same time. The wallets being grouped together are not evidence of Sybil behavior on their own. Most of the cited "connections" come from operational patterns that were openly common within the campaign. Shared gas sponsorship, similar wallet activity timing, multi-hop funding paths, and repeated PoH interaction patterns are all natural outcomes of following the exact onboarding structure encouraged by admins and community guides. Correlation alone is not proof of coordinated abuse. What concerns me more is how challenges are being handled. Instead of helping newer users understand wallet analysis properly, some participants are weaponizing overly technical graphs, funding trees, and confusing evidence dumps to push narratives that many people in the community cannot even properly interpret. A shared sponsor or synchronized activation does not automatically equal Sybil behavior — especially when those patterns came directly from people like me, guiding real humans through a process they were eager to learn. The team isn't helping matters. They don't offer direct help or support to help challenged victims vindicate themselves. These are new people. They don't know all the rules, both old and existing ones. They're being left to defend themselves against accusations they don't fully understand, with no guidance from the very project they trusted. Now they're losing their funds and are being asked to appeal with extra funds for extra jurors. Jurors are chosen at random but more drawn towards those with high weighted staked PNK. The team isn't helping at the appeal stage either. A system where newbies are targeted because of ignorance and not wrongdoing isn't fair. No direct proof has been presented showing shared ownership, automation, farming scripts, account control overlap, or malicious intent. Genuine users are being forced to defend themselves against assumptions rather than actual evidence. Following the participation structure that was publicly normalized should not later be reframed as grounds for removal. If the goal is a healthy ecosystem, then accusations should be based on concrete proof — not complicated charts designed to overwhelm voters who may not fully understand the context. If standards are going to change, they should be applied consistently and transparently across all participants, not selectively after users followed the process they were shown. My community will not be made an example of. These are real humans I personally taught. I won't let them suffer @kleros_io @proofofhumanity @zealy_io

For one month labor 🥹 I need help