@TheDesignFlaw

#PardonAssange Free Speech anti-Empire bitcoin idealist Decentralize the Globe Nostr: npub1s3kqvzrx380xeq3yynzmhayp3kfhfp7a4uq8su8ntw2duwnta0asr2n0a9

Global
Joined August 2010
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
2
6
559
To the "I have nothing to hide, screw privacy" people, the story that could be told about you would make you realize how wrong you are. It doesn't have to be a true story, just a compelling one.
Replying to @lex_node
You don’t fully grasp how much of your life is tracked until you’re sitting in a courtroom, watching federal prosecutors use your digital history against you, down to your most harmless Google searches. Your entire life becomes an open book, and even your most innocent actions can be twisted into something sinister. They get to tell the most damning version of your story. To tell yours in your own words, you have to take the stand.
2
33
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
Welcome back to one of the most consequential and courageous human beings of this century: easily one of a small handful of pioneers for the causes of a free internet and independent journalism. The US and UK did everything to break and destroy Julian Assange, but he prevailed:
215
3,864
36
27,387
583,804
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
1624. 17th September
1
7
1
37
1,102
There are people of every race, of every sexual orientation, every gender, and every age that are now dead because of the religion of Vaxx-extremism. Here is BMJ confirming it, while simultaneously trying to cover their asses, as they were one of the main culprits.
25
The return of @JulianAssange to twitter has been independently verified by a trustworthy source, in case you were wondering.
For those asking: Yes, the #X handle @JulianAssange is actually the @wikileaks founder Julian #Assange. I have independently verified it
15
Which influence-for-hire campaigns do you think you've fallen for, anon? They've always existed, but AI has exponentially streamlined them.
2
32
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
He's back @JulianAssange
2,469
13,802
1,264
93,105
19,865,715
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
Un autre tΓ©moignage hallucinant de l'enquΓͺte Allison... L'experte en recherche mΓ©dicale Deanna McLeod rΓ©vΓ¨le qu'aprΓ¨s l'injection des vaccins COVID-19 sur la population, le nombre de fausses couches a augmentΓ© de 82 % en Ontario seulement.
33
586
30
899
15,119
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
What's more iconic than this? I'll be in the replies reading wrong answers.
1
10
1
27
4,416
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
AI Cartel Wipes Out 150 Billion, Then Cancels Their IPO nitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1qGoNYkWz…
2
2
12
5,678
Every single day since the operation started, twitter has tried to foist the Open AI and Anthropic dude on me. Always number one on the list.
24
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
Unsurprising: cops and the surveillance State are the *main* source of dangerous data leaks.
‼️ BREAKING: We're in contact with the Revolut hacker. According to them, they didn't only take Revolut data, they've also compromised multiple Italian law enforcement departments. They say the operation targeting Revolut ran for six months, and that they used Italian law enforcement systems to send data requests to Revolut. They claim to hold 147 GB taken from the Italian side, including internal docs, calendars and personal material, among it the chat logs of a federal officer arguing with his wife.
9
38
1
263
9,057
This is very important advice. We live in a time when the emotions you feel from your "it" are harvested and monetized. While that is happening you may get a little dopamine hit, but you don't get healed. Getting healed is bad for their business. Work hard. Get healed.
You need to get over it if you want to be the best version of yourself. Whatever "it" is. Past traumas, failed relationships, fears. Work at it. It won't happen overnight. But don't let these things define who you are.
29
I haven't done the things David has, but I agree with him. I think it's far more likely that certain humans would purposely create a lab grown virus designed to kill most of us while blaming it on AI, than AI creating one.
I must be among an extremely small group of people (n=1?) that have both 1) trained a frontier LLM and 2) designed and synthesized custom viruses in a lab with my own two hands. And I think that the takes on AI killing us all by creating dangerous viruses is total bogus.
1
30
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
β€œAI safety”: OpenAI and Anthropic panicking their profits are getting wiped out by open-weight models 😱
Dario has written that we need to β€œpace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead. You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric β€” market share, revenue growth, model capability β€” the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement. I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible. But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who aren’t even at the frontier. Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want. Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sanders’ β€œshut it all down.” China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well. So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it. If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture β€” or an election-season psyop.
4
5
39
3,219
Do you feel rage because of Lindsay Clancy supporters? Do you feel rage because of one black juror who disagreed? Do you hate women now, sir? Do you hate men now, ma'am? Egggggcelllennnnnttt... you're in the palm of their hand.
If you find yourself hating your neighbors because of something your TV or Phone told you about...
2
61
π“π‘πž πƒπžπ¬π’π π§ 𝐅π₯𝐚𝐰 retweeted
Gen Z, I'm sorry you never got to see the world before September 11, 2001. 🧑 -Gen X
25
16
4
570
11,204
Never forget how the government used the death of thousands of Americans to give itself more power at the expense of our civil rights.
1
18