Pinned Tweet
My 2026 forecasts:
GDP H1 lifts to 2.5%; sub 2.0% in H2
Unemployment rate to 5%
Inflation eases 2.0 to 2.25%
Wages growth soggy at 3%
RBA cuts to 3.10%
10 yr bonds 4.00%
AUD lifts to 75 c
House prices – no change, downside risks
ASX200 – below 8,000
youtube.com/watch?v=u6007K2J…
If addition to smashing shareholder's wealth, Geoff is missing what should be an obvious issue that the tax changes do take money out of the economy, further repair the budget & take some pressure off inflation. It's pretty simple. But I suppose if you've never worked in an area that implements govt policy, you can be excused for being ignorant of how it all works
Using your words: @TheKouk classic “jellyback” take.
Opposing the world’s highest effective CGT rate (and the negative gearing hit) isn’t “wanting a bigger deficit and stimulus”. It’s opposing a tax that hammers productive investment, housing supply and ordinary people trying to build wealth.
You’re equating tax rates with government spending. That’s either economic illiteracy or deliberate spin. People aren’t stupid and the polling shows they see right through it. Spineless defence of economic vandalism.
Time to grow a backbone.
Any other thoughts on the Kouk?
It's really odd that when there are problems with inflation, the likes of @GeoffWilsonWAM want a larger budget deficit and govt stimulus
Saturday Morning Omnibus - May the horse be with you
Cotality house prices – 5 cities – down 1.5% in October. Another $160 billion or so slashed from household wealth in one month.
Talk of fiscal tightening in the MYEFO – Bring it on. A budget surplus is in reach, it’s a badge of honour & it does help to get inflation lower.
Some agricultural prices falling – cheese, milk, OJ, coffee, cocoa. Does it mean anything?
Victoria election betting: Odds mean 75% probability of Coalition win, about 22% Labor, 3% some other result.
Horse tips for Flemington, Randwick & Morphetville.
youtube.com/watch?v=TDFkL9E5…
Anyone for a budget surplus? It could be on the cards for 2026-27.
The Commonwealth government budget numbers are looking chipper with the underlying cash balancing running $10.6 billion ahead of the May Budget time run rate for the first 3 months of FY2026-27.
youtube.com/watch?v=xg2mr4x2…
What is it that the RBA knows that all other central banks don't when it comes to the current inflation problems?
All other CBs are happy to hold or at least take baby steps given the growth inhibiting effect of oil prices. Yet the RBA, with rates already at a 15 yr high, seems hell bent on hiking further
ICYMI
“To hike, or not to hike, that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them?”
William Shakespeare - Hamlet
Virtually everyone, including the drover’s dog & Blind Freddie, expect the RBA to hike rates on 3 November.
If the majority of the Board agrees with the whims & ramblings of the rafter of senior Bank officials in recent weeks, it’s shut the gate on the hike.
Be that as it may, there are a growing number of concerns about this strategy & in the attached video, I outline a series of questions that the Board should have answer to as it contemplates its next policy step.
youtube.com/watch?v=EqdeZlEZ…
Could it be that the high inflation rate has nothing to do with supermarket price gouging?
Obviously, yes
Coles warns on sales, profit
afr.com/companies/retail/col…
Stephen Koukoulas retweeted
Has Australia’s push for lower house prices gone too far? ft.trib.al/wY1hIXs
Stephen Koukoulas retweeted
Why does the RBA watch the trimmed mean?
The RBA targets headline CPI inflation. But headline inflation is noisy. One-off price shocks push it around: the GST in 2000, free childcare and the fuel price collapse in 2020. A central bank can’t set policy on that noise. It needs a measure of the underlying trend. This is sometimes called core inflation.
The ABS publishes two. The trimmed mean drops the 15% of price changes at each end of the distribution and averages the middle 70%. The weighted median takes the single price change in the middle.
A good underlying measure has to pass three tests.
First, it must not drift from headline over time. If the target is headline, the trend measure has to track it in the long run. Since 1987, the quarterly gap between the trimmed mean and headline averages 0.00 points. The weighted median averages 0.01. Both look unbiased in growth terms.
Second, it must be less volatile than headline. Both underlying measures cut the volatility of quarterly inflation by about two thirds.
Third, it must be persistent. This quarter’s reading should tell you something about next quarter’s. Headline inflation has an autocorrelation of about 0.4. Both underlying measures sit near 0.85.
So why the trimmed mean over the weighted median? On noise and persistence, the median currently wins by a whisker. But the price level chart [see follow-on tweet] shows where the median falls down. It wanders much further from headline. After nearly forty years, the trimmed mean index sits about 1% above headline. The weighted median sits about 1.5% above, and it ran as far as 6% above in 2020. Small biases in quarterly growth compound into large gaps in the price level. For a bank that targets headline, that matters.
The reason lies in how each measure is built. The median rests on one item: whichever price change happens to land in the middle. When the distribution of price changes is lumpy, the middle can jump from one item to another, and the median lurches with it. The trimmed mean uses 70% of the basket. It throws away the outliers but keeps most of the information. That makes it harder to knock off course.
The trimmed mean also has a simpler story. It’s an average with the extremes removed. Anyone can understand that.
So the RBA takes the measure that filters the noise without losing touch with the thing it’s trying to control.
1/2 ...
“To hike, or not to hike, that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them?”
William Shakespeare - Hamlet
Virtually everyone, including the drover’s dog & Blind Freddie, expect the RBA to hike rates on 3 November.
If the majority of the Board agrees with the whims & ramblings of the rafter of senior Bank officials in recent weeks, it’s shut the gate on the hike.
Be that as it may, there are a growing number of concerns about this strategy & in the attached video, I outline a series of questions that the Board should have answer to as it contemplates its next policy step.
youtube.com/watch?v=EqdeZlEZ…
Looks like the Cotality house price series will show a nation-wide fall in prices in October around 1.3%.
October house prices month to date (one day to go):
SYD -1.5%
MEL -0.8%
BRI -1.7%
ADE -1.0%
PER -1.6%
5 cities -1.4%
These are chunky: Huge wealth destruction that the RBA is ignoring / downplaying at its peril
RBA yesterday said domestic demand was too strong & an important part of the inflation problem
The data do not support this view
The pain in Australia’s retail sector has started with those companies closest to the housing price slump. As Chanticleer writes, it'll only spread from there. afr.com/chanticleer/housing-…
Potentially very damaging to see the US Fed getting so heavily swayed by Trump & the elections next week.
Not hiking is crazy given inflation, fiscal settings & the current level of rates
My latest:
The ABC’s once-great economics coverage has become a parade of crises
capitalbrief.com/article/the…
It's a pity Justin was not appointed to the RBA when there was the shake up a couple of years ago.
This is spot on - the RBA is having kittens about the oil price - which is a bit like shouting at rain clouds telling them to stop raining
There's actually a coherent case for not raising rates: energy prices are a supply shock, so the inflation blip fades on its own.
But if the Fed is just hoping inflation falls, that's not a policy. newsletter.platypuseconomics…
Noteworthy impact of those electricity rebates the ended on 31 December 2025. They were not great policy
Annual change in electricity prices to Sept 2026 +12.8%
Since January 2026 -0.8%
Will make a chunky difference to annual inflation when the January data are released
Insights on the Canadian interest rate hike.
There is something there for Australian economists to consider, rather than presenting carbon copies of RBA-speak. (I used too work with Mark - he's good bloke)
Great news... Leonetto Cappiello will be pleased!
Campari confirms 2026 outlook after 3.4% rise in third quarter revenue reut.rs/4swPqT2
Annual price changes in CPI:
Get some pork on your fork.
Things that rose a lot:
Milk 5.4%
Fruit 10.2%
Tobacco 8.3%
Accessories & clothing services 5.3%
Property rates & charges 5.6%
Water & sewerage 10.2%
Electricity 12.8%
Petrol 23.6%
Maintenance & repair of cars 6.7%
Postal services 7.9%
Domestic holiday travel 5.3%
Games, toys & hobbies 15.5%
Sports participation 5.3%
Secondary education 6.6%
Insurance 5.4%
Things that were weak:
Cakes & biscuits +0.3%
Pork -1.3%
Poultry +0.4%
Eggs -2.3%
Jams, honey & spreads +0.3%
Snacks & confectionary +0.4%
Coffee, tea & cocoa -1.0%
Wine +1.1%
Men’s clothes -0.4%
Women’s clothing -1.4%
Children’s clothing -3.3%
Shoes -0.4%
Furniture -1.3%
Household textiles -4.5%
Household appliances & tools -0.6%
Personal care products +0.2%
Urban transport fares -12.3%
Pets & related products -2.4%














