Jacó retweeted
هیچ توییتی فعلا به پای این یکی نرسیده
ترامپ اومد نفت ایران رو مفت بری کنه رفت درش ، اون به خوبی متوجه شد شاهزاده مردم رو داره و یک لیدر قدرتمندی هست که باج نمیده و برای همین راهش رو کلا جدا کرد و رفت به دنبال یک فرد نظامی ضعیف شده در داخل نظام که همان پروژه ونزوئلا رو در ایران با شکل و شمایل دیگر اجرا کنه که خوشبختانه موفق نشد الان هم عدو شود سبب خیر حالا دو تا راه جلوی پایش هست ، یک اینکه بدون هیچ دستاوردی از جنگ خارج بشه و نامش به عنوان بدترین رییس جمهور تاریخ آمریکا ثبت بشه و کلا پرونده جمهوریخواهان رو در دو انتخابات بعدی ببنده یا اینکه با نابودی جمهوری اسلامی با یک دستاورد بزرگ به استقبال انتخابات بعدی ریاست جمهوری بره هم اسمش در تاریخ ثبت میشه هم جمهوریخواهان و آمریکا رو سیو میده
Jacó retweeted
The Republicans didn’t lose because Trump attacked Iran, they lost because Iran had the ability to fight back. Republicans lost because Iran did whatever it needed to do to retain the military capability to impose an economic toll on Americans for the actions of their government.
Jacó retweeted
Former IDF chief Gadi Eisenkot received the backing of 67 of the Knesset's 120 members for the first chance to form Israel's next government. The recommendations were delivered to President Isaac Herzog.
Jacó retweeted
بازم جنگ نزدیک شده.
اگه نت قطع شد هیچ خارکصده ای از خارج ایران حق نداره بگه ما صدای مردم ایران هستیم حمله کنید.
خارکصده من کشورم، زیرساخت کشورم برام مهمه.
کیرمم نیست تو داخل اروپا چه حالی داری.
Jacó retweeted
"They're losing a war against a dead man"
Replying to @Aelthemplaer
I dont understand this Jewish cope posting. They're losing a war against a dead man and I don't even like Iran.
مرحله اول این پروژه رو به اتمام رسوندم، یه روز به خودم استراحت دادم و الان سومین روز از اون یه روزه.
Jacó retweeted
مردم آمریکا از جنگ خسته نیستند، من به آنها کردیت اخلاقی نمیدهم.
آنها از جنگ هایی که در آن "می بازند" خسته شده اند.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Jacó retweeted
برخلاف گزارهای که جلوگیری از تغییر رژیم توسط اسرائیل را عامل شکست جمهوریخواهان معرفی میکند، اتفاقاً در مسئله جنگ، ترامپ قربانی هدف حداکثری تغییر رژیم ایران شد. هدفی که اسرائیل دنبال میکرد، با محاسبات سیاسی و انتخاباتی ترامپ همخوانی نداشت.
Jacó retweeted
یا بهتر اینکه بپرسیم آیا ما تحمل داریم که یک افغانستانی یا پاکستانی که در ایران به دنیا آمده و خودش و پدر و مادرش ۵۰ سال است ساکن ایرانند مثلا شهردار تهران بشود؟
























