The Observer

@duccyyyy @YahuCapital

$EOS.AX EOS Defence Systems (EOS) and VOP CZ have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) at Future Forces Forum in Prague to explore cooperation on wheeled armoured vehicle programmes for the Czech Army and other future defence projects in the Czech Republic and Europe where VOP CZ is involved. The agreement brings together EOS' expertise in advanced remote weapon systems (RWS) with VOP CZ's established capabilities in military vehicle integration, production and sustainment. The companies will assess how their technologies and industrial capabilities could support the Czech Army’s requirements, while identifying opportunities to collaborate on other defence programmes.

$EOS.AX Update on ILUM: according to hartpunkt, EOS Space Systems has formed a consortium with Plath and a third, unnamed German company to bid for the DLR's ground-based anti-satellite laser programme. Plath is a Hamburg-based specialist in signals intelligence and electronic reconnaissance. Partnering with German companies is an important step after HoWism, where the naval laser was awarded directly to Rheinmetall and MBDA. Bidding as part of a German consortium should make EOS far less exposed to the same political dynamics. Competition looks limited so far. Observers see MBDA as a possible bidder, given its laser cooperation with Rheinmetall, but its participation is not confirmed. Trumpf and Rohde & Schwarz have teamed up on military lasers, but have no known space activities.

$EOS.AX Hartpunkt reports the Bundeswehr is preparing a larger procurement of Diehl's GARMR counter-drone vehicle, starting with a small qualification buy. Army chief Freuding says Panzerbrigade 45 will get counter-drone capability before deploying to Lithuania, as an interim solution it will keep using once the target systems arrive. The weapon station on GARMR is an EOS R400.

The MARSS contract £370m, around A$700m, with a GCC government for a nation-wide counter-drone system. Largest contract in EOS history by some margin. NiDAR sits at the core, EOS is prime and systems integrator, and the scope covers third-party sensors across electro-optical, radar and sonar plus an initial supply of third-party effectors, hard-kill interceptors and soft-kill jammers. More than 80 percent of revenue lands in the first 12 to 24 months once conditions are satisfied, with the remaining fifth spread across four years of support. Schwer laid this out on the May capital raise call. “We are in negotiation with one Middle Eastern country, which is asking to install a nationwide command and control system to protect the entire territory of this country.” MARSS had beaten “two major multi-billion dollar heavy European prime contractors” in the tender, phase one would be “more than 300 million US dollars,” and “we expect this program to be in the multi-billion dollar range.” EOS exclusively mentions third-party effectors in the release, which indicates the first phase carries no EOS effectors at all. This can be explained by capacity constraints on the EOS side, a problem EVP Kormany talked about in a recent podcast. Since this contract covers the immediate needs of an entire nation, the effectors being sourced are most likely the ones that can be made available quickly. EOS has already posted the £37m performance bond, backed by the £40.3m deposit from 12 August that showed up as a subsequent event at the H1 result. Still outstanding is a £74m bank guarantee, and the announcement says EOS “requires certain consents and further accommodation from WHSP and providers of guarantee facilities.” That reads as available cash plus an expanded WHSP facility rather than equity. Note also that the guarantee and a customer advance payment of the same size sit in the same condition, so the cash position at that moment is roughly flat. The raise Schwer mentioned in an interview a few weeks back is more likely aimed at guarantee capacity for the next run of contracts than at this one. Australian banks will not write these guarantees without cash behind them, so every contract of this size ties up collateral until EOS is big enough to negotiate that down. The conditions themselves are ordinary. Export licences within two months of receiving customer documentation is standard for defence equipment crossing borders, and the June Slinger contract carried the same condition and cleared it quickly. This is not comparable to the Goldrone situation at all. The release reads very risk heavy. Capped and uncapped damages, a five-year warranty, termination rights, the customer able to take the work elsewhere at EOS’s expense. Most of that comes down to EOS being a small company that has just won a nation-wide programme against two primes, and a customer wanting more security as a result. The rest is standard language that ASX rules require on a contract announcement. Backlog goes well past A$1bn from A$846m at June. Management has talked about roughly A$1.8bn of MARSS order intake by mid-2027, so around A$1.1bn still has to come from the rest of the pipeline.

$EOS.AX Oh My God

$EOS.AX The Netherlands and EOS signed a letter of intent this week, announced by the Dutch Ministry of Defence on 24 September. Both parties intend to develop the High Energy Laser into a full weapon system and to examine setting up a production site with a Dutch-led European supply chain. EOS intends in principle to carry out development and production in the Netherlands, which the ministry says makes the Netherlands EOS's European base. If the further development succeeds, the Netherlands intends to acquire a number of laser systems. State Secretary Derk Boswijk gave more detail in a radio interview the same morning. He described the arrangement as the Netherlands placing a fairly substantial order in exchange for EOS coming to the Netherlands, producing there and doing the knowledge development locally. So this is explicitly industrial policy as much as procurement. His reasoning is the cost asymmetry. He pointed to the opening days of the conflict between the US and Iran, where Patriot interceptors costing hundreds of thousands to a million each were fired at drones worth tens of thousands. On the technology he said it is no longer a thing of the future, the technology exists and it works. He was also clear it is not a silver bullet, and that Patriots, counter-drone systems and lasers will operate alongside each other. Asked whether there is a risk that EOS fails to develop the weapon properly, he said they have confidence in its potential, because they have already seen the prototype. He noted the prototype has a much weaker capability than the planned system and is already achieving impressive results. That is what convinced them the technology belongs to the future of air defence. On capability he said the system could defeat drone swarms and penetrate one and a half to two centimetres of plate steel. On cost, the system itself is roughly as expensive as a traditional air defence system, with the saving coming from ammunition rather than acquisition. Underneath it all is strategic autonomy. Boswijk called air defence a sector where Europe is heavily dependent on suppliers from outside Europe, and said that if the Netherlands gets this right, it could make other countries dependent on it instead.

Space remains the smallest segment and revenue actually fell 4% year on year. The numbers are irrelevant for now. The commentary on future prospects is far more interesting and shows why space control could eventually be larger than counter-drone. Schwer stated that the German government has allocated more than €35bn for space defence by 2030, with a significant sub-line designated for ground-based protection of space assets, the exact niche in which EOS leads. EOS can track any object in space down to the size of a coin, including in cislunar orbit, and correct for atmospheric distortion to a degree nobody outside the US can match. Combined with the laser technology, that allows engagement of satellites from the ground regardless of orbit, from temporary blinding through to permanent disabling. Schwer also said space is coming sooner than expected and now anticipates meaningful revenue before 2030. Discussions are already underway with partners and customers across the globe, and the mobile Atlas variant should be revealed in early 2027.

From what management said on the call, MARSS is going considerably better than anyone could have expected when the acquisition was announced in January. During the first half it secured A$200m in new orders and contributes A$225m to the unconditional order book. The first tranche of the earn-out is already complete, with €120.3m of qualifying orders triggering €24.06m, which if taken entirely in shares is roughly 5.7m shares at A$7.40. BAE Systems selected MARSS to integrate NiDAR as the nerve system for all its future counter-drone offerings, after reviewing the global market. The £85m country-wide Middle East contract signed in May is expected to be substantially implemented across 2026 and 2027, with roughly 70% of revenue and cash earned in that window. Most MARSS contracts follow a similar pattern, with 60-70% of revenue recognised in the first 12 to 24 months. The most significant item, perhaps in the entire report, sits in the subsequent events section. On 12 August EOS provided a bank guarantee of £37.1m, roughly A$70.9m, to a prospective Middle East customer as a condition precedent to a proposed contract, secured by a £40.3m cash deposit. Management stated that the contract is expected to be signed imminently. On the call, CFO Cuthell mentioned that bank guarantees like this one usually represent 5-20% of contract value. Looking at the slide of prospective orders, the only one that fits is the MARSS contract above A$500m with a Middle East customer. That would put the guarantee at roughly 14% of contract value, squarely within the stated range. Such a contract would be the largest in EOS history and would push the unconditional order book well beyond the A$1bn mark. The same slide shows three further potential MARSS contracts each worth more than A$100m with new customers, and the Nigerian MoU probably sits inside that group, alongside a A$150m follow-on order. Schwer also said he is very confident of signing MARSS orders worth up to A$1.6bn within the next twelve months, so by the middle of 2027. That order intake would be almost double the current backlog and close to the entire market capitalisation before last night's 23% move. Enquiries from European nations increased substantially following the drone attack on Leipzig airport a few weeks ago. EOS is now in contact with interior ministries, airport and critical infrastructure operators, and police forces. Protecting critical infrastructure from drones and missiles is precisely where MARSS has proven itself during the war in the Middle East. Management also noted that MARSS scales without capex, since the in-house contribution is software.

The Dutch contract is running about a year ahead of schedule, with delivery moving from 2028 to the middle of 2027. Critical Design Review was passed in Q2 2026 and the system is now going into production. More importantly, the customer is ready to place the first low-rate initial production contract "much ahead of the delivery time of the first system." The slides put that contract above A$300m. From the way management framed production, it also appears that all Apollo systems for the Netherlands will be built in Singapore with no localisation. EOS is separately in discussions with the Dutch about navalising Apollo. Beyond that, EOS is negotiating three further volume Apollo contracts, each exceeding A$200m. The countries named across HELW discussions are Germany, France, Turkey, Italy, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Korea and Australia. Schwer went into more depth on what a 100 kW system can do. Beyond drones, it can defeat slow rockets, artillery shells and mortars. He also said the 100 kW market will be the dominant mass market over the next decade. The development timeline for 300 kW was given as four years, one year longer than previously indicated in an article by Aviation Week.

RWS accounted for over 80% of first half revenue, with the order book standing at A$507m. EOS signed A$303m in new orders during the half, the largest being the A$175m Gen 5 Slinger contract. Others included inaugural R800 orders from customers in the Middle East and South Asia. EOS also delivered the first R800 integrated with MARSS NiDAR. Schwer signalled that another pre-production contract for the M1E3 Abrams could be signed either late this year or in early 2027, with the first high volume order expected in late 2027 or early 2028. Management has previously described the Abrams integration as a potential multi-billion dollar programme over 15 years. Management also disclosed production capacity for the first time. The Huntsville facility can currently produce 300 systems a year on one shift and 500-600 on two. Australian capacity sits at a similar level, and the UAE facility under the Gen 5 JV will add capacity for hundreds more. While what management said about RWS exceeded my expectations, there are a couple of things to be critical of. The potential size of the first R500 order with a Middle East client has fallen from A$700m to above A$200m, and the timing has slipped, since Schwer said in 2025 that the contract would be signed within twelve months. Management also evaded the question about supply constraints. Owen Humphries from Canaccord asked directly whether the implied second half step down in the core business related to supply constraints. Cuthell answered that the first half had been especially strong and put the difference down to the lumpiness of contracts and the timing of deliveries, before adding that EOS continues to manage capacity and supply chain constraints. He never actually said whether those constraints were the reason. To be fair to management, they did point to something concrete on supply. Schwer credited a framework agreement signed with Northrop Grumman years ago for securing 30 mm cannon supply, which he says lets EOS deliver faster than competitors in a market where delivery speed is the constraint rather than demand.