GKS

You were asked for evidence that unvaccinated children are healthier. You’ve supplied a persecution narrative. The methodological questions remain unanswered. Henry Ford’s explanation is explicit: the 2020 draft was shelved after its first internal scientific review because of serious problems with its data and methods. The institution disputes that it suppressed valid findings. You can challenge that explanation, but a recorded expression of fear does not repair the analysis. Median follow-up was 970 days for vaccinated children versus 461 for unvaccinated children. Healthcare use also differed substantially. When you count diagnoses recorded during medical care, unequal opportunities to receive those diagnoses require careful handling. “The CDC’s recommended design” is an appeal to authority from someone accusing that authority of corruption. Identify the recommendation, then explain how this analysis adequately addressed confounding, unequal follow-up, and differences in diagnostic opportunities. Safety signals warrant investigation. Calling them signals does not exempt them from scrutiny, and scrutinizing them does not constitute persecution. An investigator’s anxiety is evidence of his anxiety. It is not evidence that vaccines injured children.

Carole, perhaps you should learn what gasping syndrome is before frightening parents with it. Gasping syndrome was associated with benzyl alcohol toxicity in premature infants receiving large cumulative doses of preservative-containing medications. It was not established as a consequence of routine newborn vitamin K injections. The FDA recommends preservative-free formulations for newborns when available. Meanwhile, a new JAMA study of 5.2 million infants found approximately 20 additional intracranial hemorrhages per 10,000 babies who didn't receive vitamin K. You have a warning about a preservative. We have millions of babies providing evidence of the consequences of refusing vitamin K. Try reading the medical literature beyond the warning labels.

Joseph, does an infectious disease specialist’s expertise stop at passport control? England having measles outbreaks strengthens the case for vaccination campaigns. It gives Neil every reason to recognize the danger of undermining them elsewhere. You’ve answered criticism of the person running American health policy by assigning a physician in London personal responsibility for his country’s vaccination coverage. Then added an unsupported insinuation about money. Address Neil’s (@DrNeilStone ) argument. His postcode is doing far too much work in yours.