Pinned Tweet
If you own a HW3 car, Wednesday night is your night.
Tesla reports earnings Wednesday, and shareholders have been voting all week on which questions get asked on the call. One of the most backed questions on the list is the one you have been asking all year. When do HW3 owners get the upgrade?
You know the history. Tesla promised HW3 owners a path back in April, a discounted trade in or a computer and camera swap. Six months later there is still no price and no date, and v14 Lite is where your cars stop.
The voting closes Tuesday at 4 PM Eastern. Wednesday night Tesla either answers it in front of everyone, or skips it in front of everyone.
So, HW3 owners. What do you need to hear Wednesday? A real date? A price you can plan around? Or are you done waiting on soon?
Model S and Model X owners waited longest for v14 Lite. They got the thinnest version of it.
Intel Model S and Model X were the last HW3 cars to get v14 Lite, on October 14. But their Lite is missing Arrival Options, start from Park, and reversing. HW3 Model 3 and Y get all three.
Same Lite name. Different Lite. The flagship cars paid the most and got the least.
And this is the end of the line. Lite is the last major branch for HW3. No v15, no unsupervised path. The only thing left is the hardware upgrade Tesla promised outright buyers, with no date, no cost, no process.
HW4 cars, meanwhile, run full v14 and hold the unsupervised path.
Model S and Model X owners, is the thin Lite enough for your daily driving, or does the missing list settle it?
HW3 owners and HW4 owners, your $99 a month question just got a free answer.
Tesla just launched FSD referrals. An owner can now send a friend a free month of FSD (Supervised) through the Tesla app. No $99 first month, no guessing whether it is worth it on your car and your commute.
Here is why the hardware split matters. On HW3 the trial runs FSD Lite, the capped stack. On Hardware 4 it runs full v14. Same free month, totally different question answered. HW3 owners find out if Lite is enough for their daily driving. HW4 owners find out if full v14 is worth $99 every month.
This lands right where the buy again debate left off. All week owners argued monthly versus outright. A free month settles the monthly side with zero risk, and the paid subscription cancels anytime.
The catch is narrow. It is US only for now, and it is for people who have not subscribed to FSD in the past 12 months. And no, this is not the new car order deal. That one is 3 months with a car order. This one is a subscription trial between owners.
My link is in the reply below.
HW3 owners, HW4 owners, what would a free month have to prove before you pay the $99?
My link: tesla.com/get-app/referral?c…
Terms as reported: US only for now, and the free month is for people who have not subscribed to FSD in the past 12 months. If you sign up for the paid subscription before the free month ends, the referrer gets a free month too, or $99 in Tesla credits if they own FSD outright. Referrer rewards cap at 12 per year. This is the new subscription referral, not the 3 month new car order deal.
A Seoul court just told 88 Tesla owners what FSD does not promise.
It ruled the package never promised a car that drives itself with no human involved.
The owners said Tesla Korea began selling FSD around March 2017. They sued in 2024, saying more than eight years on, the system still had not arrived.
The court said no. It found Tesla had already delivered basic Autopilot and Enhanced Autopilot, and a recent update added traffic light and sign recognition plus city driving to older Hardware 3 cars.
So the name stays. The refund does not.
If you paid for FSD years ago, what did you think you were buying?
Your HW3 car got FSD Lite. Did anyone actually pay you more for it?
One 2022 Model S owner paid $12,000 for FSD. On a sale today, that FSD is put at $1,200 to $1,500.
That is the subscription math at work. At $99 a month, $8,000 was almost 7 years of FSD, and you cannot buy it outright anymore, so a buyer can just subscribe instead of paying you for it.
Lite does not change that math in any dataset I found. An insurer still prices the gap, 30% off FSD miles on HW3 Lite versus 50% on HW4 in Arizona, Colorado and Tennessee, but that is insurance, not a buyer check.
If you sold or traded an HW3 car with paid FSD, what did you actually get back?
Sources: Lemonade Oct 8, 2026, 30% off FSD engaged miles on HW3 Lite versus 50% on HW4 in Arizona, Colorado and Tennessee, insurance pricing only, not resale value: morningstar.com/news/pr-news…
Find My Electric, updated July 28, 2026, paid in full FSD at about $1,000 to $2,000 in private sales, about $1,500 on average: findmyelectric.com/blog/how-…
Tesla transfer program no longer available, delivery by Mar 31, 2026 was the cutoff. (No link for this one: no verified official Tesla URL was found, so post name and date only, no guessed link.)
The Texas Robotaxi fleet just tipped, and not toward owner cars.
Cybercabs now outnumber Model Ys in the authorized Texas fleet, 544 to 507, according to Texas DMV data. In early October it was roughly 319 Cybercabs against 420 Model Ys.
Authorized is not the same as on the road giving rides. But the direction is plain. The fleet started with Model Ys alone. Last night former Formula 1 world champion Damon Hill took his first Cybercab ride in Austin, not a Model Y.
Ashok said customer cars could join the fleet around Q2 2027. The question is what is left for them to do by then, with the purpose built car already the majority and Dallas Cybercabs planned next month.
HW4 owners, when your car can join the fleet, are you putting it in?
Sources: Texas DMV authorized fleet data via Oct 27 reporting, 544 Cybercabs vs 507 Model Ys; @robotaxi Oct 27 Damon Hill Cybercab ride in Austin; Q2 2027 customer fleet timing per Ashok on the Q3 call.
If Tesla sold FSD outright again tomorrow, would you buy it?
At the old $8,000, here is the choice as it actually stands.
Buy it on HW3 and you are paying for the ceiling. Lite is where it ends. No v15 Lite announced, and Musk has said HW3 cannot do unsupervised.
Buy it on HW4 and you are paying for a car whose computer gets replaced in production. AI5 reaches volume in mid 2027. And the purchase stays with that car forever. Transfers ended March 31.
Keep paying monthly and the math is $99 a month against $8,000, which is 81 months, about 6.7 years, to break even. Cancel anytime. Nothing sunk.
Or jump ship to Rivian. Autonomy+ is $2,500 once or $49.99 a month, with point to point reaching first owners in December.
Four very different bets.
Which one are you making?
HW3 owners already know the trade up math changed this year. Transfers ended March 31, outright purchases ended February 14.
Here is what that actually means if you trade up. The FSD you bought stays with the old car. Owners paid 8,000 dollars at the last price, some 12,000 or 15,000 earlier, and none of that follows you to the new car. You cannot buy it again either. The new car puts you on 99 dollars a month, which is 1,188 dollars a year, every year, with no buyout at the end of it.
That is on top of the trade itself. The car you trade in takes its normal depreciation hit, and the FSD line in your math flips from an asset you owned to a subscription you rent.
Waiting is the other side of it, and it costs nothing upfront. Tesla promised owners who bought FSD a free computer and camera upgrade. But there is still no date, and Musk has floated skipping to the next generation computer around mid 2027. Meanwhile v15 is headed to HW4 cars with no Lite version announced for HW3, and unsupervised is targeted around the second quarter of 2027 on HW4 hardware.
And waiting looks worse outside the US. In Australia, HW3 owners paid for FSD years ago, some at 10,100 Australian dollars, and still cannot use it at all. FSD there runs on HW4 cars only, and Tesla Australia still gives no confirmed timing for HW3, not even Lite. Most American HW3 owners wait with Lite in hand. Australian HW3 owners wait with no FSD at all.
So the choice is not just Lite versus new. It is a free upgrade with no date against a new car plus a subscription that never becomes yours.
HW3 owners, if you priced a trade up since transfer ended, what gap did Tesla quote you?
HW3 owners waited more than a year on v12 for this.
When Lite arrived in the summer, it was real progress. Smoother driving, and features HW3 had never had.
It also came with owner reports of cars throwing red hands and refusing to drive until the computer cooled down.
Now v14.3 Lite is here. So where does yours still make you take over?
HW3 owners keep asking whether v14 Lite is the real thing or a consolation prize. Months into it, here is the honest answer. It is genuinely good, and it is not the same car HW4 owners drive.
What it does best is everyday driving. Merges, forks, unprotected lefts, roundabouts, pedestrians, traffic lights, cut ins. Smoother steering, fewer false slowdowns, steadier lane centering. It parks, unparks, reverses, and lets you pick where it drops you, with Speed Profiles always on. That is a real jump from the v12 branch HW3 sat on for so long, and it is distilled from the same HW4 v14 brain, not a separate old codebase.
Where it falls short is the hard stuff. Reactions trail the full version, and the gap shows in complex edge cases, not on an easy commute. HW3 misses Automatic Collision Evasion, the feature that steers around a crash while you are driving manually. It misses the Mad Max profile and the new Smart Summon. Older S and X cars on Intel chips miss even more, no start from park, no arrival options, no reversing. Early Lite builds even had a pulsing feel owners flagged. Tesla fixed that in later builds, but it showed how tight the fit is.
That tight fit is the whole story. HW3 has about one eighth the memory bandwidth of HW4, and 1.2 megapixel cameras against HW4 5 megapixel. The modern FSD model simply does not fit on HW3 without being shrunk. That is why Lite exists, and why Musk said on the Q1 call that HW3 cannot reach unsupervised, no matter how good the software gets. V15 is headed to HW4 cars, with no Lite version announced for HW3.
So can Tesla close the gap? For supervised daily driving, mostly yes, and Lite should keep improving as HW4 teaches it. For the full HW4 experience, no. Unsupervised on this hardware is off the table, and the feature gap will widen as v15 lands.
That leaves HW3 owners three real options. Keep driving Lite, which is good and still getting better. Wait for the retrofit Musk promised to owners who bought FSD, computer and cameras both, though timing and the exact hardware are still unannounced, and he has floated skipping to the next generation computer around mid 2027. Or trade in for an HW4 car, which is the only route to unsupervised and the Q2 2027 date Ashok gave on the last call.
So HW3 owners, what is your move? Stay on Lite, wait for the retrofit, or trade up?
Yesterday Rivian pitched the future. Today it bought a piece of it.
Rivian just acquired Third Dimension, a UK startup that turns real images and video into lifelike 3D worlds. Fifteen people, absorbed into Rivian's autonomy team. Price not disclosed.
Here is why Tesla owners should care. This is Rivian building an FSD rival in the open. Point to point driving this year, personal Level 4 cars in a couple years, R2 robotaxis on Uber in 2028. What was missing was the validation engine, the part that proves the system is safe to ship. That is what this buy is.
Self driving lives or dies on edge cases, the weird stuff that almost never happens. Rivian gets 400,000 driving sequences a day from its own cars. Third Dimension lets it replay real scenarios with moved cameras, shifted traffic, different light and weather, without waiting for those rare moments to happen on the road. That is exactly the muscle Tesla built its FSD lead on: data, multiplied by simulation.
Fifteen people will not outdata Tesla. But the direction is now unmistakable. Rivian is assembling a full FSD competitor, piece by piece, in the open.
So for HW3 owners still waiting on an upgrade answer, and Hardware 4 owners watching their Q2 2027 unsupervised date, the question from yesterday stands, sharper now. What moves you? A demo, a date, or a car in your driveway?
Rivian's acquisition, via TechCrunch: techcrunch.com/2026/10/22/ri…
Wednesday night Tesla would not even answer the HW3 question.
Last night Rivian's CEO took a reporter for a ride through New York and laid out what comes next. Point to point driving, hands off and foot off, in New York this year. Demoed in San Francisco in December, then sent to Gen 2 R1s and every R2 over the air.
And then he went further. The same Level 4 kit goes into personal cars. Your own car dropping you at the airport. Picking someone up for you. Nobody in the driver seat at all, a couple years out. Plus a robotaxi with Uber in 2028.
So here is the question for Tesla owners.
HW3 owners, you got silence on the call Wednesday night. HW4 owners, you got a Q2 2027 date for unsupervised. Rivian is now pitching you a car that drives itself with nobody up front, at the same price as a Model Y Performance, on Tesla's own Superchargers.
If Rivian actually ships this, who switches?
The Scaringe ride: nitter.cf/rhensing/status/211340…
They had the question. 667,000 shares behind it. Last night, they skipped it.
Go read the call. The investor questions covered Cybercab scaling, Optimus training data, unsupervised timing, Cybercab for sale, robotaxi costs, Optimus costs, and mapping. The HW3 upgrade question is not in there. Not answered, just not asked.
And here is the part that stings. The question right above it on the list got an answer. Unsupervised FSD in customer cars: Ashok said somewhere around Q2 2027. So HW3 owners now have a date for the thing their cars cannot do, and still no answer on whether their cars get the upgrade to do it, free or otherwise.
About four million cars were sold on a promise their hardware cannot keep. Last night was the night to say what happens to them. The call ended at 6:30 Eastern without saying it.
HW3 owners, after last night, are you still waiting, or are you done?












