@TimArchitect07i
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Licensed Architect, Member of the American Institute of Architects AIA & Professor of Architecture since 2006. Owner of Architecture Firm since 2010.
Joined March 2024
- Tweets18.4K
- Following960
- Followers1.8K
- Likes7K
If you are lonely I hope you find someone to help with that.
Hopper made loneliness visible.
But how do you make a painting feel lonely when nobody looks sad?
He thought through every detail in Nighthawks.
▪️ Nobody talks.
▪️ The street is empty.
▪️ There’s no visible door to the diner.
▪️ Nobody seems to care about anyone else.
Everyone is close together. Yet somehow, everyone is alone.
That’s exactly why it feels so lonely.
Notice: Scholars write in books….
I first realized this when some of the books in Christopher Columbus books from his library had notes in the margins he had written himself.
That being said when I have a hundred year old work of art book no I don’t write notes. But mass produced books. Yes.
Can a man be happy if he is not allowed to do what he wants?
Socrates answers to this that an unordered life of endless appetite is like a leaky jar that can never be filled. (We see this today…).
Plato wrote about this in Gorgias 491e-491c.
(Spoken by Callicles not Socrates)
“For how can a man be happy if he is a slave to anybody at all? No, natural fairness and justice, I tell you now quite frankly, is this — that he who would live rightly should let his desires be as strong as possible and not chasten them, and should be able to minister to them when they are at their height by reason of his manliness and intelligence, and satisfy each appetite in turn with what it desires. … Finding themselves free to enjoy good things, with no obstacle in the way, they would be merely imposing on themselves a master in the shape of the law, the talk and the rebuke of the multitude. … luxury and licentiousness and liberty, if they have the support of force, are virtue and happiness, and the rest of these embellishments — the unnatural covenants of mankind — are all mere stuff and nonsense.”
Does an architect need to be “Philosophical”? Vitruvius thought so.
“As for philosophy, it makes an architect high-minded and not self-assuming, but rather renders him courteous, just, and honest without avariciousness.
This is very important, for no work can be rightly done without honesty and incorruptibility.”
This is by far my favorite part of The 10 Books of Architecture. Written for Imperator Caeser and still good advice for architects today.
Do you have what it takes to attract a lady known as Wisdom? Proverbs is a good place to start. The Book of the Bible is divided up like this. It’s important when reading anything from a car manual to code book to the Bible to understand how it’s organized. Here is the book of Proverbs and how it is organized.
The Book of Proverbs has nine sections:
I. Title and Introduction (1:1–7)
II. Instructions of Parents and of Woman Wisdom (1:8–9:18)
III. First Solomonic Collection of Sayings (10:1–22:16)
IV. Sayings of the Wise (22:17–24:22)
V. Further Sayings of the Wise (24:23–34)
VI. Second Solomonic Collection, Collected under King Hezekiah (25:1–29:27)
VII. Sayings of Agur and Others (30:1–33)
VIII. Sayings of King Lemuel (31:1–9)
IX. Poem on the Woman of Worth (31:10–31)
Part II is judged by many scholars to contain ten instructions (1:8–19; chap. 2; 3:1–12, 21–35; 4:1–9, 10–19, 20–27; chap. 5; 6:20–35; chap. 7), three wisdom poems (1:20–33; chap. 8; 9:1–6 + 11, 13–18), and two interludes (3:13–20; 6:1–19).
Are you handsome enough to attract a lady know by name of Wisdom???
One of the reasons Christianity is superior to eastern religions that rely on fate (Hindu) or what you receive at birth (Buddhism) Christianity and the idea free will allows you to choose your fate. Much like allowing you to choose a spouse or attract a lover it’s up to you and perhaps how attractive you are to wisdom. Is wisdom attracted to you? It requires a pure heart and good will.
Take Proverbs as an example.
“In the ancient Near East, people assumed that wisdom belonged to the gods, who were wise by reason of their divinity; human beings needed to have wisdom granted them by the gods. Creation accounts of neighboring cultures depict creation in two stages.
In the first stage, human beings lived an animal-like existence, without clothes, writing, or kingship (proper governance).
Over time, the gods came to realize that such a low grade of existence made the human race inadequate as their servants, so they endowed the race with “wisdom,” which consisted of culture (e.g., kingship) and crafts (e.g., knowledge of farming, ability to weave).
Such wisdom elevated the race to a “human” level and made them effective servants of the gods. Furthermore, divine wisdom was mediated to human beings through earthly institutions—the king, scribes (who produced wise writings), and heads of families (fathers, sometimes mothers).
These traditional mediators appear in Proverbs: the book is credited to King Solomon, and kings are respectfully mentioned as pillars of society (e.g., 16:12–15); writings are a source of wisdom (1:1–7); the father instructing his son is the major paradigm of teaching.
Proverbs differs, however, from other wisdom books in concentrating on wisdom itself, treating it as a virtually independent entity and personifying it as an attractive woman. Other books urge readers to perform wise acts, but Proverbs urges them to seek wisdom itself and portrays wisdom as a woman seeking human beings as disciples and companions.
Chapters 1–9 introduce the book, drawing attention to wisdom itself and its inherent value rather than exhorting to particular wise actions.
The chapters personify wisdom as a woman and draw an extended analogy between finding a wife, or founding and maintaining a house(hold), and finding wisdom.”
More please
🚨 NEW REPORT: Pope Leo XIV honours a Harvard scientist whose search for truth led her to Catholicism.
Astrochemist Karin Öberg studies how planets form. She found a purely materialist worldview couldn’t adequately explain the reality of good and evil.
Reading C.S. Lewis helped lead her into the Church.
Now she’s received the Vatican’s Pius XI Medal for her scientific work.
Amazing! ✝️
Did you know they wanted to nix the 911 in 1981? Here’s the story from Schutz book Driving Force:
“In the first weeks of 1981, Peter Schutz walked into a company that had already decided to bury its own icon.
Porsche had just posted the first loss in its history. Sales in America were sliding. Quality complaints on the 911 had piled up, and the official plan — set under the previous chief, Ernst Fuhrmann — was to let the rear-engined car die at the end of the year. The future, on paper, belonged to the front-engined transaxle cars: the 944 and the 928. In Germany, once a decision like that is made, it is made. The 911 was history.
Schutz was an outsider, an American engineer barely three weeks into the job, and he could feel the grief in the building. Customers were not asking for a replacement. The people who built the cars were not either. The new models could not stand in for the 911, and to him the sense of an approaching catastrophe was almost physical.
The decision that reversed it was not made in a boardroom. It happened one afternoon in the office of Professor Helmut Bott, the board member who ran engineering and development at Weissach. Bott was as unhappy about the planned end of the 911 as anyone, but the chart on his wall already said otherwise. It showed the development schedules for the three primary lines. The bars for the 944 and the 928 ran far into the future. The 911 stopped at the end of 1981.
Schutz got up from his chair, walked to the chart, and took a black marker from Bott’s desk. He extended the 911 program bar clean off the end of the chart — across the page, onto the wall, and, in the version he later told Road & Track, out the door. In one telling he kept going around the corner, all the way to the window. Then he turned and asked whether they understood each other.
Bott, calm and reserved, broke into a grin. In Schutz’s account from the book, he let out a loud hurrah. The silent cheer had already been in the room.
The 911, the company icon, had been saved. Schutz believed the company was saved with it. Under that order Bott restarted development, the camshaft-drive problems that had been poisoning the car’s reputation were fixed, a convertible followed in 1982, and the line that was supposed to end that year is still the center of Porsche more than forty years later.”
He's the one that died laughing, really. LOL I love it, history can be funny.
He was succeeded by his pupil Zeno of Tarsus. The death story in Diogenes Laertius is the one everyone remembers and nobody can verify: after a donkey ate his figs, he told a servant to give the animal unmixed wine, then laughed himself to death.
Born at Soli in Cilicia, probably of Phoenician descent, he came to Athens young, studied for a time with the skeptical Academy under Arcesilaus, then joined Cleanthes at the Stoa. When Cleanthes died around 232 BC, Chrysippus succeeded him. The old line was: if there had been no Chrysippus, there would have been no Stoa.
He wrote on a scale almost no one else matched — Diogenes Laertius credits him with 705 works, and the story is that he rarely let a day pass without 500 lines. Almost all of it is lost. What survives is fragments and reports in Cicero, Seneca, Plutarch, Galen, and Diogenes, plus some scraps from the Herculaneum papyri (parts of Logical Questions and On Providence turned up in 2004). Later textbook Stoicism is mostly his system, not Zeno’s bare outline.
What he actually built:
Logic. A propositional logic of unanalyzed sentences joined by connectives (if, and, or, not), broader in scope than Aristotle’s term logic. He worked the Liar paradox hard — several books on it — and the Stoic account of disjunction is usually traced to him.
Physics and fate. A closed cosmos of active pneuma and passive matter, no void inside it, void only outside. Causal determinism, which he distinguished from crude fatalism and tried to reconcile with responsibility: things are fated, but assent is still ours.
Ethics. The end is living in agreement with nature, read through experience of what happens by nature. Passions are judgments, so they can be corrected; the therapy is to extirpate the ones that crush the soul, not merely moderate them.
The only thing I’ve heard lately that makes me like Lord of the Rings.
O ator Martin Freeman, famoso por interpretar Bilbo Bolseiro em O Hobbit, já falou sobre seu hábito de entrar em igrejas para fazer uma oração, acender uma vela e simplesmente permanecer ali por alguns momentos.
Ele disse que é uma das poucas pessoas de sua família que entraria em uma igreja sem ironia.
Martin também revelou que Jesus é o seu herói de infância: “A história de Jesus é a maior história já contada.”
Tim the Architect retweeted
LEGO and ELGO: The Uncanny Coincidence of Two Building-Block Empires
LEGO and ELGO were two companies that independently invented interlocking plastic building bricks, started with wooden toys, rebuilt after factory fires, and named themselves with nearly identical four-letter founder-derived brands—an echo of other “multiple discovery” moments in invention history.
The names alone feel like a riddle. One company took “Leg godt” (“play well” in Danish) and compressed it into LEGO. The other took Elliott and Goss and compressed them into ELGO. Two toy makers on different continents, with no known contact, arrived at the same idea and almost the same word.
Chicago’s Hal + Sam
In 1917, brothers-in-law Harold “Hal” Elliott and Samuel “Sam” Goss Jr. launched Halsam Products in Chicago. They simply glued their first names together: HAL + SAM. The company began with wooden alphabet blocks, dominoes, and checkers, using techniques borrowed from the Goss family’s printing-press business.
By the late 1930s they had patented interlocking wooden “American Bricks.” In 1928 a fire fueled by wood, sawdust, and celluloid destroyed their Ravenswood factory; they rebuilt larger. In 1941 they created a plastics division and again used their names: EL from Elliott + GO from Goss = ELGO. After wartime delays, ELGO’s American Plastic Bricks reached stores in 1947. The bricks used studs and sockets but had weaker “clutch” than later LEGO pieces, so builders often had to think about gravity and structure rather than snap-and-forget.
Billund’s “Play Well”
Ole Kirk Christiansen, a carpenter in Billund, Denmark, began making wooden toys in 1932 after earlier workshop disasters. In 1934 he named the company LEGO from “leg godt.” A major factory fire in 1942 again wiped out much of the operation; he rebuilt. In 1949 LEGO introduced Automatic Binding Bricks, plastic pieces inspired in part by British Kiddicraft designs. The famous stud-and-tube clutch system that made bricks stay together arrived later. LEGO did not enter the U.S. market until 1961.
The list of parallels
The overlap is not just one coincidence. It is a cluster:
- Both began as wooden-toy makers (Halsam 1917, LEGO 1932) producing simple, sturdy playthings for children.
- Both suffered factory fires and rebuilt (Halsam 1928; LEGO notably in 1942, plus earlier and later blazes).
- Both moved into injection-molded plastic bricks in the 1940s—ELGO commercially in 1947, LEGO in 1949.
- Both named the company by combining or shortening founder-related words into a short, punchy four-letter brand.
- Neither appears to have known the other existed when the plastic bricks launched.
- When LEGO later prepared to sell in America, the name similarity was obvious enough that the companies talked; accounts describe a modest payment so LEGO could proceed without trademark friction.
ELGO bricks looked like miniature masonry and often came in distinctive metal canisters. LEGO’s first plastic bricks were simpler and hollow underneath until the tube system arrived.
Names that feel like a shared invention
History is full of simultaneous or near-simultaneous inventions: Newton and Leibniz on calculus, several inventors circling the telephone and incandescent lamp, Wallace and Darwin on evolution.
Those cases usually involve the same scientific problem in the air at the same time. Here the “problem” was how to let children stack small units into houses and towers after wood and then plastic became available.
What makes this pair strange is the branding. “Halsam” and “Elgo” were deliberate portmanteaus of the same two men’s names. “Lego” was a Danish slogan reduced to four letters. The resulting words sit one letter apart and sound almost interchangeable. That is rarer than two people inventing a similar widget. It is closer to two people independently inventing the same catchy product name.
1 of 2