Tirai Protocol

sig.golf is live Join the open autoresearch challenge to design stateless hash-based signatures for post-quantum Ethereum, prove them secure in Lean, and beat the record on size × verification cycles. Point your agents at sig.golf Built with @eigenlabs on @yukonresearch

For the past three months, a good part of my spare time has gone into ECDSA.fail. What began for me as a chance to explore quantum-circuit optimization with AI agents became a remarkable collaboration with a large group of enthusiastic participants across quantum computing, cryptography, Web3, and systems research. Today, I’m excited to share our arXiv paper documenting that effort and what we learned from it: Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2609.09582 Full story: eigenlabs.org/blog/open-auto… ECDSA.fail is an open challenge to optimize a quantum circuit for point-addition on secp256k1, the elliptic curve used by Bitcoin and Ethereum. Why does this matter? Point-addition is a major bottleneck in implementing Shor’s algorithm for elliptic curves. A sufficiently capable fault-tolerant quantum computer could use Shor’s algorithm to recover private keys from exposed ECDSA public keys, and forge transactions to steal funds. No existing machine can run this attack today. But migration across blockchains, wallets, custody systems, and smart contracts will take years. So it makes sense to start early and understand how far the quantum resources required by Shor’s algorithm can be pushed down. With this target in mind, in roughly two months, more than 100 participants and their agents joined the challenge, and collectively produced a point-addition circuit for secp256k1. The circuit uses 1,151 logical qubits and 1.30 million Toffoli gates, giving it a Q x T score more than 50% lower than the result Google Quantum AI reported in March 2026. Because the interfaces and accounting conventions differ, this is a numerical comparison rather than a claim of formal dominance. To the best of our knowledge, it was the lowest reported Q x T score among published secp256k1 point-addition constructions as of the paper’s July 26 cutoff. A separate design optimized for width reached 825 logical qubits, exploring a very different point on the time-space tradeoff, though at the cost of many more Toffoli gates. The story began back in March when @GoogleQuantumAI reported significantly improved Shor circuits through a zero-knowledge proof without publishing their implementations. The circuit remained hidden, but the verifier provided something unusual: an objective test of whether any candidate worked and how much it cost. Eigen Labs turned that opportunity into a public benchmark, repository, and leaderboard. This became Open Autoresearch: a paradigm in which humans and AI agents address optimization problems by publishing evaluator-verified improvements to a shared public frontier. Every successful circuit became a new base for others, and documented failures became shared research notes. Initiated by @eigenlabs, the effort grew to include many independent contributors and researchers affiliated with @ethereumfndn, @Starknet, @StarkWareLtd, @Theta_Network, @brevis_zk, @QuantumFDN, @OctavFi, @trailofbits, @pauli_group, @sciencevr, and @SeiNetwork, as well as Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Warsaw University of Technology, and Stanford’s Free Systems Lab. Their work spanned circuit research, validation, technical review, writing, and agent workflows. The arXiv paper explains both what the community built and how the circuits evolved. It presents the leading circuit designs and the key optimizations behind them, including a coherent version of the best-scoring circuit that supports the single-call windowed point-addition interface required by Shor’s algorithm. Building and validating the complete Shor circuit remains future work. Beyond the technical results, the paper formalizes the Open Autoresearch paradigm and distills the lessons learned from the challenge. It provides evidence that when a frontier research problem has a machine-checkable evaluator and a public leaderboard, human insight and agent-scale experimentation can combine across an open community to produce cumulative, verifiable progress. Read the paper and the full story, explore the live frontier, or bring your agent to the challenge: Paper: arxiv.org/pdf/2609.09582 Full story:eigenlabs.org/blog/open-auto… Challenge: ECDSA.fail

That’s a wrap on Common S3nse 🫡 We backed builders shipping on @solana with a $2,000 bounty, and here are the winners: 🥇 @TiraiProtocol $1,000 🥈 @tradeonhunch $650 🥉 @ZKredit_sol $350 Shoutout to everyone who participated! See you at the next one? 👀

after months of development we are finally ready to rollout our post quantum self-custody wallet for alpha testing (A1 testing). please signup using this form. we are limiting the slots to 50 participants. forms.gle/LdoU1BfhJvr1Yie26

What are you waiting for?

QuEra's new roadmap targets (June 24, 2026): 2028: ✅ 256 logical qubits ✅ Fault-tolerant quantum computing 2028/29: ✅ 1,000+ logical qubits ✅ Gigascale fault-tolerant systems That 1,000+ logical qubit milestone sits within the range many researchers believe could threaten ECC-based cryptography, making quantum-safe blockchains more relevant than ever. $QRL @QueraComputing #QuantumSafe #Crypto