
Cybersecurity Strategy Consultant. Channel Swimmer 🤽♂️🥊 🇫🇷🇬🇧 Wargaming and MTG card enjoyer. #COYL Views my own not my employer’s.
St Albans, England
Joined May 2009
- Tweets2.1K
- Following3.3K
- Followers1.2K
- Likes5.2K
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
During the last Tory government I was invited by a defence minister, it doesn’t matter which one, all goofs, to speak in his office about their then strategy and defence review, it doesn’t matter which one, all crap. I was flattered though. I brought along a copy of Imperial Military Geography, I think 1935 edition, my point being that you must decide the war for which you are preparing and then take stock of your resources and that is exactly what the people who won WW2 did.
I said that you must not assume that some other power was going to deliver capability you needed but did not possess organically. That included assumptions about the USA and other powers. A nation state like Britain had to start from an honest calculation of its resources and capabilities relative to its interests and capabilities.
As of 2026 this seems pretty obvious. At the time, the minister’s political advisor sat at his shoulder rolling his eyes at practically everything I said like I was an escapee from a lunatic asylum. The minister, a political man, shook my hand warmly and I’ve never spoken to a minister again.
The moral of the story is not that the minister and his advisor was stupid. They were blind, but it’s a kind of blindness that afflicts smart people who are too smart by half so that they never question their assumptions because they’re too convinced of what they think they know.
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
When boardgame listicles go wrong gamingwithtom.substack.com/p…
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
Every civil servant worth his salt believes he could move to the private sector and earn 50% more.
I certainly thought so - yet my experience was rather more humbling.
A piece on how success shouts its name to the world, but failure is invisible.
open.substack.com/pub/edrith…
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
Gianni Infantino’s vulgar, grasping, Italian-Swiss corruption really does make one long for the halcyon days of Sepp Blatter and his elegant, refined, German-Swiss corruption.
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
A brilliantly accurate dissection of England’s self-destruction. Every word is spot on.
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
Pov: You're a Dane who just landed in Northumbria thinking there's more monks to kill and rob, then you encounter a 6'8 Anglo shithouse.
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
Less than 600 players right after a Standard Pro Tour.
At this rate we’ll be able to learn everyone’s names by the next Spotlight Series.
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
Long-term cannabis use 'changes brain structure and leaves users demotivated, unable to make decisions and struggling to deal with complex tasks' trib.al/TVbCUPY
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
"Can we get rid of this ayatollah T-shirt? Khomeini died years ago."
"But, Marge, it works on any ayatollah-- Ayatollah Nakhbadeh, Ayatollah Zahedi. As we speak, Ayatollah Razmara and his cadre of fanatics are consolidating their power."
"I don't care who's consolidating their power."
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
“we have seen the highest levels of family voting at any election in our 10 year history of observing elections in the UK.”
👀The Electoral Commission give Democracy Volunteers access to polling stations at election time. Only they and the police can go inside. They’ve just issued this report about “family voting” in Gorton and Denton:
Democracy Volunteers deployed four accredited election observers across the Gorton and Denton Westminster Parliamentary By-election today. The team attended 22 of the 45 polling stations in the constituency, spending between 30 and 45 minutes in each.
The observers worked in pairs using the international standard for election observation - the four eyes principle. Each team assessed several aspects of the polling process, from accessibility to issues around the integrity of the vote.
Staff were welcoming to the team and we would like to thank them for their time in accommodating our work.
The team assessed two significant aspects of electoral integrity - family voting (where two voters either confer, collude or direct each other on voting) which breaches the secret ballot. The team also assessed the impact of the requirement for voters to show ID before they are issued with a ballot paper.
2023 saw the enactment of the Ballot Secrecy Act, which made the practice of family voting more clearly a breach of the secret ballot, making it more enforceable by staff in polling stations. Signage is now available to discourage the practice. Signage was only seen in 45% of the polling stations observed.
The observer team saw family voting in 15 of the 22 polling stations observed, some 32 cases in total, nine cases in one polling station alone. The team observed a sample of 545 voters casting their votes - meaning 12% of those voters observed either caused or were affected by family voting.
Commenting John Ault, Director of Democracy Volunteers said;
‘Today we have seen concerningly high levels of family voting in Gorton and Denton. Based on our assessment of today’s observations, we have seen the highest levels of family voting at any election in our 10 year history of observing elections in the UK.’
‘We rarely issue a report on the night of an election, but the data we have collected today on family voting, when compared to other recent by-elections, is extremely high.’
‘In the other recent Westminster parliamentary by-election in Runcorn and Helsby we saw family voting in 12% of polling stations, affecting 1% of voters. In Gorton and Denton, we observed family voting in 68% of polling stations, affecting 12% of those voters observed.’
The team also observed cases of voters being turned away, however, in each case this was due to them not being a registered voter for Westminster elections, such as having EU citizenship, and only being allowed to vote in local elections.
The team also saw a number of voters taking photographs of their ballot papers and one voter being authorised to vote despite them already having been marked as voted earlier in the day.
Democracy Volunteers has informed elections staff at Manchester City Council about our findings today.
This Statement is now available on the Democracy Volunteers website HERE.
--
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
Gorton & Denton's new Green Party video is entirely in Urdu and features some blatant visuals.
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
Just launched MTG Meta Analyzer. An open-source tool to explore the metagame with charts, matchup matrices, and archetype breakdown customization.
Check out the results from this weekend's 2 RC + AC11: j6e.me/mtg-meta-analyzer/
#MagicTheGathering #MTG @fireshoes @SaffronOlive
Tom Russell-Mésenge retweeted
The idea that the Tories lost the last election on ‘competence’ is pseudo-analysis; superficially persuasive as long as you don’t think about it, but the moment you do the effect on the mind is akin to filling a watch with glue | my latest for @ConHome conservativehome.com/2026/01…
























