Tom Bell retweeted
We're pleased to announce that Dr Victoria McCloud has been appointed as Associate Member following her retirement as a senior Judge sitting in the High Court of England & Wales gatehouselaw.co.uk/gatehouse…
bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ…
Learning points from this judgment
i) Central London CC has room for improvement
ii) The duty on advocates to ensure that litigants in person have a fair hearing is v important
iii) The litigant in person who never gives up may actually be in the right
Tom Bell retweeted
Some of them might also like to see the bill come into force and fail, rather than block it and be blamed for stopping an immigration silver bullet.
Tom Bell retweeted
We're delighted to announce that Michael Wheater has been recommended for silk (KC) in the 2023 competition. Congratulations, Michael! Thoroughly deserved. Learn more about his expertise here... gatehouselaw.co.uk/michael-w…
Tom Bell retweeted
New post
The Rwanda Bill and its constitutional implications
publiclawforeveryone.com/202…
Interesting parallel between Miller 2 and Rwanda in the Supreme Court. In both, the government essentially lost because it didn’t file evidence. In Rwanda (the case), there was no evidence to show that Rwanda (the state) was a reliable asylum claims processor.
Tom Bell retweeted
We are delighted to announce that Emily Betts has been appointed to the Attorney General’s B Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown. Many congratulations, Emily! Thoroughly deserved. bit.ly/3rQg8Lg
Tom Bell retweeted
THE GAP OF HOPE 🤞🤞🤞
#Ashes
Tom Bell retweeted
We’re delighted to report that we've been shortlisted for 8 awards at the Legal 500 Bar Awards 2023. Congratulations to the nominated members and teams 👏 bit.ly/46F08vv #L500awards @thelegal500
Nil points in April for Supreme Court permission-seekers!
supremecourt.uk/news/permiss…
Had to call on the services of a local beekeeper this morning to rescue us from a swarm of honeybees! Glad they’ll be going to a good home
Google Bard has just blown my mind. I tried this prompt:
"Please explain Donogue v Stevenson but make it funny"
Here's the output:
The case of Donoghue v Stevenson is a landmark decision in the law of negligence, and it has been cited in countless cases since then.












