⚫️from a parallel universe ⚫️ multiverse philosophy ⚫ music ⚫️ ordinals ⚫ interaction theory⚫ @starbreeder_DAO ⚫ bitmap
Joined November 2010
- Tweets2.5K
- Following436
- Followers250
- Likes9K
Pinned Tweet
Proposing a Bitmap DAO 🟧.
I love bitmap and think about it a lot. You might know me as the founder of @starbreeder_dao - but this is not a Starbreeders project.
It’s a contribution to bitmap itself.
+46k wallets hold bitmap.
Discussions of this community scatter across reply sections and private groups. Therefore sentiment is guesswork - nobody can see where the holders actually stand.
That is why I propose a Bitmap DAO.
I took live the domain bitmapdao org (which now is in my custody, but will hand over once the DAO is formed).
It is intended to be a voting and discussion space for every bitmap holder and builder.
Next:
I’m already working on an on-chain voting mechanism for bitmap holders - open source very soon.
And the first thing to discuss is (besides we agree such a DAO is something worthwhile) the voting rules themselves I guess. The commons decides how the commons decides.
To be clear about what this is not:
it claims no authority over the standard. Nobody elected us. Votes make the community’s voice visible - they bind no one.
What drives me to do propose this:
I noticed, this community doesn’t always pull on one string. Different camps, different visions - which is normal for an open standard. Maybe even healthy. But there’s no room where the pulling happens face to face.
This is that room. It takes no side, and it never will.
What gets discussed is ours to decide:
For example how to onboard the next 46,631. Or fair and sustainable bitmap claims (DAO-bitmap-bot anyone?).
And surely questions none of us have thought of yet.
Full transparency: Besides the domain and the infrastructure it runs on, I also work on a voting mechanism - will open source it very soon for anyone interested to review.
Once the DAO has formed itself, everything - domain, keys, moderation - is handed over. That’s the point of building it.
The door is open to everyone who holds a bitmap or builds on one - including everyone who shaped this standard from the beginning.
No token. No fees. No permission needed.
Just a commons.
Bitmap fam, let's discuss here 🟧: nitter.cf/i/chat/g21153473834709…
Introducing Ordinals DAO protocol.
As of now no protocol existed to allow any bitcoin or ordinals community to align, discuss, organise or make decisions.
This Ordinals DAO protocol (dao) enables anyone to set up such an organisation onchain - immutable, publicly, inscribed forever on the Bitcoin network.
The protocol enables anyone to set up a DAO for any set of ordinals or bitcoin holders. That means ordinals collection, bitmaps, galleries, a hand-picked list of inscriptions, BRC-20 tokens, Runes etc.
Uncensorable voting for everyone - directly on the worlds most widely distributed public leger.
The aim is to provide an infrastructure for communities to connect, exchange, organise, align, elaborate sentiment, find consensus, etc.
This open source protocol leaves any ruleset open to be defined within DAO proposals. In its basic form, how this protocol used or not used is completely open for any community to decide.
This means of course, DAO voting results are not necessarily binding - but they might be, if in such way defined rules and contents of a proposal pass its defined thresholds.
Such DAO can be inscribed by anyone:
Collection founders, asset holders, and even unrelated entities. The protocol does not define how or if an offer is to be taken serious. This will be decided by the community that is eligible for participation based on the "asset" definition.
Per default, ownership of any Ordinals DAO inscription does not grant any authority over any DAO, its deployment or proposal. Anyone can own a DAO inscription, but no one can own the DAO - because that constitutes by its asset holder entities.
Any of such rules though may or may not be defined and set by a respective proposal.
This means, any DAO deployment or proposal might be inscribed by anyone. Bound/commited/associated with it will only ever be eligible asset inscription holders who voted for it.
As to kick off the protocol -
bitcoin.dao (cc860f43be4ac8c3c5e332a8f96900893382e264cbdfb5b68834fd676eade2c9i0)
ordinals.dao (162a6c700dfa9fcc78180f62d4f051c574a26f3cb47fd6e56573ea29a4100f6di0)
bitmap.dao (12d57e97e3218a3fffb7a6fa86a8ffbc62dc44668db2bf6361f587dc77f6f848i0)
have already been deployed.
Also their genesis proposals are waiting for you to be voted on - the window is open for 2016 blocks.
On how to vote now and how to inscribe a DAO and submit proposals check the public repo in the comments section.
Which dao will you deploy on the motherchain?
On DAO deployment: A simple way to add collections to a dao is to add the gallery/parent inscriptions from the repo github.com/TheWizardsOfOrd/o… by @TheWizardsOfOrd as “asset”.
A more straightforward way to generate your vote inscription .json can be generated by a small vote builder tool inscribed here:
ordinals.com/content/ab6960c…
You are welcome to contribute - the current infra makes votes rather complicated (BIP-322 signatures required). let’s change that: github.com/t-STRBRDR/ordinal…
Note: For voting you are only eligible if you hold the right asset in the wallet you inscribed your voting in. In order to do that, a BIP-322 signature is required. More on how to sign and inscribe your votes correctly you can read on github.com/t-STRBRDR/ordinal…
natum retweeted
Live from the BITMAPWIN engine 🟧 every block here comes from Bitcoin. Step in: bitmapwin.app/launch
natum retweeted
597 starbreeders.
the rarest:
🎆 supernovae (21)
⚪️ neutron stars (13)
⚫️black holes (8)
2023 was the time of ordinals to arrive.
2023 was our kick off approaching singularity.
natum retweeted
1/
1964.
A legendary astronomer named Kardashev ranks every civilisation in the universe by a single metric:
⚡️energy harvested.
While humanoid entities still sit below Type I, @Starbreeder_DAO ⚫️🧬👽 has broken the scale for aeons.
And their story is written on the motherchain 🟧 🧵
