@TurtleShell_xyzi
iAccount based inPoland
About this account
- Account based in
- Poland
- Connected via
- Web
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
building a general purpose Circuit Breaker to narrow down all attack vectors of Smart Contracts to just one secured by all
Turtle Island
Joined April 2023
- Tweets399
- Following170
- Followers205
- Likes451
thanks to all the people who have donated so far, you won't be forgotten about!
if you haven't donated yet make sure to leave a tip with wallet that has a gitcoin passport 👇
we are excited to be part of @gitcoin `s #GG22
donations are open until Nov 6th
if u care about web3 security, go ahead and leave a tip:
👉 explorer.gitcoin.co/#/round/…
👉 explorer.gitcoin.co/#/round/…
we are excited to be part of @gitcoin `s #GG22
donations are open until Nov 6th
if u care about web3 security, go ahead and leave a tip:
👉 explorer.gitcoin.co/#/round/…
👉 explorer.gitcoin.co/#/round/…
✨ we have partnered with 🔴@Optimism to power the @SuperchainEco and builders on the OP Stack a more powerful and secure developer experience.
Our open-source Developer Tools and SDKs are ✅LIVE!
🫵 If you are an optimistic builder, go check it out 🛠
TurtleShell retweeted
.@turtleshell_xyz: Prevent unintended outflows & safeguard against hacks with on-chain Smart Contract Firewall, enhancing your protocol's security!
explorer.gitcoin.co/#/round/…
A lot has been happening in the back ... we are happy to announce that we are coming @Arbitrum
Making the life of @ArbitrumDevs safer & easier 🫡
Learn more in our blog post ⤵️
link.medium.com/M1jAuqVIJHb
TurtleShell retweeted
Making progress ...
Try it Out:
forge install turtleshell-xyz/circuitbreaker --no-git
Status update:
-> CB SDK still in the making
we aim to have some things ready to show at @EthereumDenver
We will spread the word and do more publicity efforts when getting closer to the finish line.
Until then, please sign up for the SDK ... its worth it ;)
How would you more likely implement CBs
100%General Purpose Framework
0%Custom Integration
2 votes • Final resultsOur Thesis:
CBs will eliminate many current Attack Vectors that protocols are facing. However, integration efforts can be high, especially when adding them to afterwards to a live system. We have certain thoughts on how the development overhead and adoptin barrier can be reduced
TurtleShell retweeted
i have talked to 1000+ teams in the last year
im baffled that nobody considers circuit breakers in their stack
the standard security roadmap should be:
1) internal audits
2) external audits
3) audit contests
4) bug bounties
5) circuit breakers
h/t @TurtleShell_xyz
Replying to @optimizoor
Yes, in theory I think this is achievable with circuit breakers.
Assuming you’re reusing an audited general purpose circuit breaker / asset bottleneck you just slap it on and if your core logic has a bug the mechanism will just block the assets from leaking out.
Are you buidling in DeFi 👉 use Circuit Breaker SDK
Sign up to get early access ⤵️
forms.gle/29KCr7KCSMXTmFJr9