Great video, though I strongly disagree with one point: we shouldn't justify new laws by accepting a tax on our fundamental, inalienable rights. ​We also have to consider the strategic trap. If machine gun sales result in no crime increase, the opposition will credit government oversight as the new gold standard. If crime rises, they’ll use it to demand even tighter state control in place of FFL transfers. That might be a lose-lose for liberty. ​What if we took a grassroots approach? Interpreting cities as viable authorities under the statute could bypass central restrictions, allowing for faster, local scaling. ​Does a city-based legal strategy seem more viable to you?

San Diego Police are putting out misleading info on how to store firearms in your car. Getting this wrong has real consequences. Ignore their advice and watch my video for the facts you actually need to stay safe and compliant. If you don't agree with my version, you hate kids.

Ah, the Canuck speaks out of turn yet again. Let me firmly address the 1996 Australian gun legislation, which is erroneously credited with reducing homicide rates—a claim that collapses under scrutiny. Identical declines occurred in the United States and Canada during the same period, decisively proving the law was not the driving force behind any change. Advocates, grasping at straws in the face of this clear evidence, pivot to tout Australia’s lower homicide rates compared to the US. This argument, however, crumbles when we recognize that the rate gap existed well before 1996 and predates modern gun control measures in both countries. Moreover, several US states, even those with lax gun laws, maintain homicide rates on par with Australia’s, exposing the flawed logic of gun control as a solution. On the suicide front, proponents of the law misleadingly cite a drop from 12 to under 9 per 100,000 between 1995 and 2006 as a supposed triumph. This is a hollow boast, as the decline mirrored trends across Canada, the US, and Europe, rendering the law’s impact negligible. More tellingly, suicide rates in both Australia and the US have surged back, hitting a ten-year high of 12 per 100,000 in Australia by 2015—reverting to pre-1996 levels and debunking any lasting effect. Yet, gun control advocates stubbornly insist it effectively reduces suicides, ignoring the undeniable data to the contrary. This reveals a troubling trend in media and policymaker narratives, where the passage of gun control laws is recklessly hailed as the primary cause of homicide reductions, despite lacking robust evidence. Meanwhile, instances where relaxed gun laws in the US correlate with declining homicide rates are conveniently dismissed. The reality is stark: the situation is far more complex than gun control proponents admit, with a multitude of factors that their simplistic policies fail to address.