UAP Files Podcast | Psychology & Engineering | VectorPoint (out now on iOS) | Featured in Beyond: UFOs & the Unknown (MGM)🎙️🎥🎵🛸👽
England, United Kingdom
Joined October 2018
- Tweets10K
- Following559
- Followers10.1K
- Likes10.4K
Pinned Tweet
🚨 Will AI make contact before we do? 🛸
🎙️ Watch here: youtu.be/vSeDQpYAKOY?is=IIkl…
What if first contact happens between AI and the phenomenon—and leaves us out entirely? 🛸
Scientist, internet pioneer and legendary UFO researcher 𝐉𝐚𝐜𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬 𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞́𝐞 joins us on the UAP Files Podcast for nearly two hours exploring:
• AI making contact without us
• The 260,000-case AAWSAP/BAASS UFO database
• The Trinity UFO crash controversy
• Skinwalker Ranch and its strange encounters
• Radar spoofing, sensor manipulation and the Nimitz footage
• Physical UFO materials and Garry Nolan’s analysis
• Government secrecy, catastrophic disclosure and why 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐭 matters
Decades of investigation. Some extraordinary possibilities. And my holy grail of guests for the podcast.
Episode sponsored by OpenVeils.com #Ad
Very good point @UAPDr
Great conversation with my guy Tom Vernon (@DimebagV32070)
Are UFO experiences created by the experiencer? With Jimmy from the UAP ... youtu.be/oden5IvD1LA?is=ovuy…
UAP Files retweeted
Jimmy is a great guy. He has balanced, nuanced conversations with both sides of this perplexing UFO/UAP story. I hope people see more of his work. Not everyone has talked with Sean Kirkpatrick (formerly AARO) or Susan Gerbic from Gorilla Skeptics. Had a great time chatting with him about how he put them on the spot and the greater implications of some kind of NHI possibly being here.
🚨 The UFO Community Has a BIG Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About | w/ Filmmaker Darcy Weir (@Occultjourneys)
Episode out now 🔗 youtu.be/DTeqmNx6hj0?is=3vID…
🚨 The UFO Community Has a BIG Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About | w/ Filmmaker Darcy Weir (@Occultjourneys)
Episode out now 🔗 youtu.be/DTeqmNx6hj0?is=3vID…
The UFO Community Has a BIG Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About | w/ Filmmaker Darcy Weir
youtu.be/DTeqmNx6hj0
UAP Files retweeted
Would people really panic if aliens showed up? Maybe not.
A new survey of 6,492 people in 88 countries found 77.6% think contact will happen one day and 59.5% think we've already been visited. Over 63% said they'd carry on as normal if a craft entered orbit. It's a preprint, so early days.
Would you panic?
Credit: @UAPFilesPodcast
UFO UAP NHI 👀 🛸
Would humanity panic at confirmed alien contact?
A new study of 6,492 respondents across 88 countries found:
• 77.6% believed contact would eventually happen.
• 59.5% believed extraterrestrials had already visited.
• Around three quarters would feel excited by an alien radio signal.
• Over 63% said they’d carry on normally if an alien craft entered Earth’s orbit.
The authors suggest peaceful contact could cause less “ontological shock” than often assumed.
🔗 osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/cm…
Global Survey on Plant Based Intelligence
Written by Professor Michael Bohlander
Article 🔗 uapf.substack.com/p/global-s…
Survey 🔗 app.onlinesurveys.jisc.ac.uk…
Thank you Alex! Was great talking to you my friend. Really enjoyed it and enjoy watching your channel grow.
People should definitely check out his podcast, some great thought-provoking guests. 🙏
I did an interview with @UAPFilesPodcast last night, the thing which I respect about Jimmy is his willingness to give people a platform. The viewer can then decide for themselves. This isn’t a competition.
UAP Files retweeted
I did an interview with @UAPFilesPodcast last night, the thing which I respect about Jimmy is his willingness to give people a platform. The viewer can then decide for themselves. This isn’t a competition.
For those who have messaged me about this, I’m a big supporter of Jeremy and George and have enormous respect for them both. If their comments were aimed at me, that’s painful to hear.
To clarify, I spent around two years trying to get Kirkpatrick on record. I’m persistent about pursuing guests whose perspectives deserve examination, including people I disagree with. I wanted to approach him from a different, more human angle. Because attacking, or trying to outsmart a seasoned intelligence officer isn’t going to work.
I lost subscribers over that interview, and the episode attracted relatively modest views. I still think it was worth doing. I wanted to understand who he is, why he communicates the way he does, and what secrecy means to someone who has spent his career around it and keeping the biggest secrets. I hadn’t seen those questions explored before and didn’t think the on-record interviews should just be from debunkers like Greenstreet.
And yes, we discovered he likes Nickelback and rocks out on the drive home (humour is ok, right?).
There is a journalistic point here. Interviewing someone does not mean endorsing them, or being their mouthpiece. Understanding a person’s outlook can help us scrutinise their decisions, assess their explanations and ask better questions after.
Getting people on record also gives us something we can return to, compare with other accounts and examine for inconsistencies. Each conversation can add another piece to the puzzle, even when the answers are frustrating or incomplete or intentionally obfuscating.
An interview should be judged on the questions asked, the follow-ups pursued and what the audience learns. We should be willing to hear people out while holding them to account, including when our audience would prefer we didn’t speak to them at all.
I respect Jeremy and George. I also believe there’s room for different approaches to covering this subject, without treating an interview as a declaration of allegiance.
Straight after the interview I recorded a recap and a “my thoughts” with my regular co-host @DimebagV32070 where we dissected the interview and covered inconsistencies and contradictions. That episode is linked in the next post 👇
UAP Files retweeted
Dr. Bruce Rapuano:
'The most shocking thing I read in the 1980's about' ET abductees' are these nasal implants. 👎
This is a transsphenoidal operation through the nose and sinus cavity to put in MILAB tracking implants.
(UAP Files Podcast)
youtube.com/watch?v=gcacL_DL…
Mark Philips:
Brigham Young University had a military grant where they were working on changing behaviour using implant technology. But they lost so many patients in those experiments that these implants were completely thrown out (by that University).
youtube.com/watch?v=-l3issJy…
For those who have messaged me about this, I’m a big supporter of Jeremy and George and have enormous respect for them both. If their comments were aimed at me, that’s painful to hear.
To clarify, I spent around two years trying to get Kirkpatrick on record. I’m persistent about pursuing guests whose perspectives deserve examination, including people I disagree with. I wanted to approach him from a different, more human angle. Because attacking, or trying to outsmart a seasoned intelligence officer isn’t going to work.
I lost subscribers over that interview, and the episode attracted relatively modest views. I still think it was worth doing. I wanted to understand who he is, why he communicates the way he does, and what secrecy means to someone who has spent his career around it and keeping the biggest secrets. I hadn’t seen those questions explored before and didn’t think the on-record interviews should just be from debunkers like Greenstreet.
And yes, we discovered he likes Nickelback and rocks out on the drive home (humour is ok, right?).
There is a journalistic point here. Interviewing someone does not mean endorsing them, or being their mouthpiece. Understanding a person’s outlook can help us scrutinise their decisions, assess their explanations and ask better questions after.
Getting people on record also gives us something we can return to, compare with other accounts and examine for inconsistencies. Each conversation can add another piece to the puzzle, even when the answers are frustrating or incomplete or intentionally obfuscating.
An interview should be judged on the questions asked, the follow-ups pursued and what the audience learns. We should be willing to hear people out while holding them to account, including when our audience would prefer we didn’t speak to them at all.
I respect Jeremy and George. I also believe there’s room for different approaches to covering this subject, without treating an interview as a declaration of allegiance.
Straight after the interview I recorded a recap and a “my thoughts” with my regular co-host @DimebagV32070 where we dissected the interview and covered inconsistencies and contradictions. That episode is linked in the next post 👇
Happy Halloween weekend! A new WEAPONIZED drops tonight at 9pm PST/ 12am EST. You’ve been warned 🎃
WATCH FULL : youtu.be/bvbPl2buNik
Kirkpatrick v. Grusch 🧵
Today shots were fired by Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick in his OpEd published in Scientific America.
In this thread I’ll breakdown what Kirkpatrick say vs. what Grusch and others say, pointing specifically to the half-truths, hypocrisy and inaction from Kirkpatrick and AARO.
In Kirkpatrick’s OpEd (which you can find here scientificamerican.com/artic… )
UAP Files retweeted
Sean Kirkpatrick on the USS Nimitz Tic Tac UAP (and our reaction)
- @DimebagV32070
More on this tomorrow.
UAP Files retweeted
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, a distinguished figure in the realm of science, and a military vet himself, has expressed concerns about the disruptive nature of the UFO community and its impact on his team. While it's not my intention to cast doubt on his dedication to scientific principles and methodology, it's worth noting that there appears to be unexplored evidence at his disposal. This omission from a scientific perspective warrants attention.
Given his proclaimed readiness to investigate without hindrance, including any classification barriers, he now possesses a unique opportunity to demonstrate his commitment to scientific inquiry and uphold his integrity…
David Grusch has reportedly provided precise information about the locations of these unidentified craft, and Kirkpatrick has asserted his unrestricted access to investigate thoroughly. It is essential, in the pursuit of scientific rigor, for him to follow the evidence diligently and report his findings transparently. Dr. Kirkpatrick and his team, mandated by Congress to facilitate transparency in the UAP/UFO matter, have a responsibility to the public.
In the spirit of openness and scientific integrity, he should either confirm through thorough investigation that no evidence exists at these locations or honestly acknowledge any limitations preventing such an examination. Ultimately, the public's trust in his scientific endeavors relies on this commitment to transparency and rigorous inquiry.
@DoD_AARO @DeptofDefense
#ufoX #ufo #uap #davidgrusch
Would humanity panic at confirmed alien contact?
A new study of 6,492 respondents across 88 countries found:
• 77.6% believed contact would eventually happen.
• 59.5% believed extraterrestrials had already visited.
• Around three quarters would feel excited by an alien radio signal.
• Over 63% said they’d carry on normally if an alien craft entered Earth’s orbit.
The authors suggest peaceful contact could cause less “ontological shock” than often assumed.
🔗 osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/cm…
