Juanma (@Ubeda_JM) header
Juanma (@Ubeda_JM) profile picture

En recuerdo de las víctimas del odio y de la intransigencia que pagaron con su vida la defensa de la legitimidad Democrática Republicana y de la libertad.

Andalucía
Joined May 2011
Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)Photo by Juanma (@Ubeda_JM)
"Todo el mundo que quiera votar a @IreneMontero o que quiera votar a @@gabrielrufian va a tener disponible una papeleta el domingo electoral para poder hacerlo, en todas las circunscripciones de España. Y eso lo cambia todo" lean👇 Revulsivo diario-red.com/articulo/edit…
50
117
8
271
13,631
880
1,398
61
3,083
117,033
Vamos a dar otro empujoncito a @PODEMOS para conseguir el objetivo y afrontar la campaña sin tener que depender de los bancos Ya se han conseguido 486.367 . Adelante que #SiSePuede Este es el enlace: participa.podemos.info/es/mi…
4
219
262
1,741
Ah, ¿que @FatymaCaballero es la mujer de @iescolar , el amigo de Errejón, el que blanquea la mesa del burdo #ferrerasgate? No lo sabía, pero eso explica muchas cosas. Vaya, vaya con el matrimonio. Pues eso, es muy burdo pero van con ello.
1
29
55
363
En días tan terribles como este,en que los medios pasan de lo superficial y lacrimógeno a lo morboso y cargado de bulos, cuánta necesidad tenemos de gente como @SanchezCedillo que apuntan y aciertan con el verdadero fondo del problema. Demasiada basura informativa, hazte eco.
3
132
186
1,896
Estaría bien que en lugar de leer a negacionistas como Marcos Llorente, se preste atención a lo que cuenta aquí @SanchezCedillo y que es la clave de lo sucedido en el accidente ferroviario: Los procesos de privatización y desmantelamiento de la red ferroviaria
58
1,270
36
2,089
72,192
Replying to @carlaizarbe
Bloquear, no. Ignorar, sí. 👇🏼
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
1
1
18
Replying to @__Gonzalos__
Bloquear, no ( es contraproducente) Ignorar, sí. Hagamos caso al que sabe 👇🏼
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
1
2
17
Replying to @Yo_Soy_Asin
Bloquear, no (es contraproducente). Ignorar, sí. Hagamos caso al que sabe 👇🏼
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
1
4
22
Replying to @ytuquesabes_
Lo estamos haciendo mal. Bloquear, no ( es contraproducente). Ignorar, sí. Hagamos caso al que sabe 👇🏼
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
2
5
16
Replying to @CKinterito
Bloquear, no. Ignorar, sí. Según André Janones 👇🏼
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
1
2
11
Replying to @lutherkingon
Dice André Janones que bloquear es contraproducente. Hay que ignorar 👇🏼
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
2
2
19
Está entrevista de 2024 👇🏼de Pablo Iglesias a Jean-Luc Mélenchon 👇🏼
"Somos los hijos de América Latina y de Podemos" Jean-Luc Mélenchon sobre la Francia Insumisa Entrevista en Canal Red: youtu.be/aA6TDIT3JsA
3
2
62
Replying to @danielgalvalizi
@danielgalvalizi Bloquear, no ( es contraproducente). Ignorar, sí.
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
2
2
27
El Fraude Amplio se autopide una auditoría 😂 y encima no respeta ni un día de luto. Cómo pollo sin cabeza.
1
1
41
🇨🇺 Cuba es una Gaza lenta y silenciosa, pero como aún no ven las bombas caer sobre los niños, casi nadie levanta la voz. Sin embargo, ya están muriendo niños todos los días por culpa del Estado gen•cida de EEUU.
94
3,070
32
8,312
66,576
👇🏻
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
1
19
47
836
Juanma retweeted
NO INTERACTUAR CON CUENTAS FASCISTAS, NO BLOQUEAR, SOLO INGORAR !! Dejen pasar los comentarios sin parar a leerlos ni contestar, así el algoritmo entiende que no es relevante.
1
6
8
142
Replying to @tritrir13
Eu nunca ensinei a bloquear ! A questão é ignorar ! Bloquear prejudica a estratégia na verdade
243
3,402
263
15,146
242,250
Atención a esto. Según @AndreJanonesMG NO debemos bloquear, simplemente ignorar.
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said! I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS! Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account. However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it! THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
18
256
3
455
5,278
Por lo que sea, La Revuelta bate récords de audiencia con Gabriel Rufián e Irene Montero. A ver si nos están ocultando las encuestas fetén, para desmotivarnos... Sería rarísimo, ¿verdad?
#Audiencias 📈| @La1_tve es la cadena MÁS VISTA vista del martes con un 14,6% de cuota y @LaRevuelta_TVE LIDERA la jornada con la visita de Rufián y Montero. 🥁 El espacio de Broncano alcanza 2.654.000 espectadores de media y un 21,7% de cuota. 🥁 Es la SEGUNDA mejor cuota y el TERCER programa más visto de su historia. 🥁 Más de 4,8 millones de espectadores conectaron en algún momento con #LaRevuelta. 🥁 LIDERA en todos los grupos de 13 a 74 años: jóvenes de 13 a 24 años (32,4%), 25 a 44 años (33,7%), de 45 a 64 años (22,2%) y de 65 a 74 años (21,6%). #ImparablesRTVE #LÍDER rtve.es/v/17286287
46
600
4
1,202
9,834