Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted
Replying to @DaniSocial22 @RWApodcast
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted

Nassim Nicholas Taleb@nntalebOct 10
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Kasparov is the best evidence that one can be both retarded and Chess grandmaster.
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted
Imagine that. Starting a war with Iran and sending 2,000lb bombs to destroy Gaza doesn’t win you the Nobel Peace Prize.
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted

WHG baddie@isa2001mOct 9
Brazil
BrazilConnected via Netherlands App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
1782: thirteen year old midshipman in the British Royal Navy
2026 twitter tards: “I’m protecting my dynasty by homeschooling my kids and not giving them a phone until they’re 18”
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted
Photo shows the aircraft destroyed by Ansarallah ballistic missile attacks on King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Meanwhile, Lufthansa and Air India have suspended flights to the Saudi Capital until further notice.
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted

AMK Mapping 🇳🇿@AMK_Mapping_Oct 8
New Zealand
New ZealandConnected via New Zealand App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
A Russian KAB glide-bomb strike on Kramatorsk, Donetsk Oblast, killed at least 33 civilians and injured 18 others. Two minibuses nearby were caught in the blast wave.
Some people burned to death trapped inside the buses, while others were simply blown apart into pieces. Body parts and charred corpses are currently scattered all across the street. I will not be sharing those photos or videos here for obvious reasons.
Separate shelling on the nearby village of Bilenke killed another 3 civilians. Public transport in both Slovyansk and Kramatorsk has since been halted.
Kramatorsk and Slovyansk should have had mandatory evacuation orders issued for civilians months ago, and yet somehow city authorities haven’t even shut down public transport yet.
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted
Actually, aggregate GDP in PPP terms is also irrelevant. If you want to be serious, you should use several other datapoints: for example, GDP per capita, territorial size, energy consumption, industrial indicators, and population.
According to basic economic theory, the only economic concepts that matter are related to individual preferences and, thus, GDP per capita in PPP terms is a good summary statistic of the size of a typical person's budget set, and therefore are a good indicator of the general level of prosperity in a society.
In these terms, Russian GDP per capita is about 50-55% of the US's, while the UK's GDP per capita is about 70-75%. Thus, it is true that the UK is a bit richer society than the Russian with a 40% larger GDP per capita. This difference is amplified if you consider that the Russians work more hours, thus the gap in output per hour worked is a bit larger than the gap in GDP per capita, with British output per hour worked being perhaps 60-70% higher.
However, the Russian economy is based on material industries while the British is a services economy: Russian industrial value added is 30% of GDP while the British is 16.5%. In addition, as Russia is 2.4 times larger in demographic size and 70 times larger in geographical size, it is a much larger industrial and natural resource power than Britain today.
Some comparative industrial indicators illustrate the substantial differences in material resource output between the two economies:
Oil production (thousand barrels per day 2025)
Russia - 10,027
Britain - 565
Steel production (million tonnes per year 2023)
Russia - 76.0
Britain - 5.6
Cement production (million tonnes per year 2023)
Russia - 57.0
Britain - 7.9
Co2 emissions (million tonnes per year 2023)
Russia - 2,069.50
Britain - 302.10
Coal output (million tonnes per year 2024)
Russia - 476.2
Britain - 2.6
Motor vehicles (units 2021, before the Ukraine war caused manufacturing reallocations in Russia)
Russia - 1,566,317
Britain - 932,488
Electricity generation (TWh):
Russia - 1,192.8
Britain - 292.3
Thus, it is quite obvious that as a nation, Russia has enormous advantages in terms of material resource supply over Britain. Considering the discrepancy in demographic size and natural resource endowments, this helps to explains why Russia is considered a great power while Britain is regarded as a middle power.
By the way, if you look at such statistics up to around 1930, when Britain was still considered a great power, it had a substantial lead over Russia in nearly all of these indicators.
Bruno Maçães@MacaesBrunoOct 4Portugal
PortugalConnected via United Kingdom App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Actually Tucker Carlson was right, sorry to say. For war all that matters is PPP and in PPP Russia does have a much larger economy than the UK. PPP in general is all that matters for geopolitical analysis. Dollar terms relevant for trade and finance (so Russia is quite poor as a consumer society)
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted

ol’ stocky ⛳️@oldstockyOct 5
North America
North AmericaConnected via North America App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
When the email says “any update on this?” and the update is I forgot it existed
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted
This is quickly becoming one of my fav memes.
MenchOsint@MenchOsintOct 3Europe!
EuropeConnected via Europe App StoreLocation may be affected by a proxy or VPN.Account-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
🛰 📍Fuel Storage tanks at Riyadh's Aramco refinery facility have been burning continuously from early morning into this evening.
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted

Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrandOct 4
Southeast Asia!
Southeast AsiaConnected via Southeast Asia Android AppLocation may be affected by a proxy or VPN.Account-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
I was having dinner last night with a friend working in the chicken industry and I learned something that blew my mind.
Where do chicken farmers get their chickens? Most of us would say "from their existing chickens obviously, they breed and lay eggs."
That's what I thought too, but turns out I was dead wrong.
The reality is that the immense majority of meat chicken farmers in the world get their chickens from one of 2 companies: Cobb-Vantress, owned by Tyson Foods, or Aviagen, controlled by Germany's EW Group (the Wesjohann family).
They have a concept specific to the industry called grandparent stock: what you buy from these 2 companies is - essentially - a bunch of chickens with planned obsolescence.
The way it works is that each company keeps "pure" bloodlines on its own farms. Let's label them A, B, C and D. Those are the crown jewels - these companies' IP - and they never leave the building.
What they sell you are the "grandparents": chicks from those four lines, but each line in only one sex. You get A roosters but no A hens, B hens but no B roosters, C roosters but no C hens, D hens but no D roosters. Which means you can never breed more A, B, C or D birds yourself.
What you can do is cross them. A roosters with B hens give you the fathers, C roosters with D hens give you the mothers - these are the "parents". The parents then give you the chickens that actually end up on our plates, slaughtered at around 6 weeks.
And that's the end of the road. If you tried breeding those chickens, their chicks would be a complete genetic lottery: still chickens, sure, but without the genetic properties that make them commercially viable. They'd grow slower and less evenly, you'd have to sell them for way more than your competitors, and your business would be dead.
So you have to go back to Cobb or Aviagen for new grandparents. Forever.
Why buy grandparents at all, and raise 2 generations just to sell the third? The answer is scale. If you buy say 100 grandparents, each of them gives you around 50 parents, and each parent hen then gives you around 150 chicks: from those 100 grandparents, you have yourself some 600,000 chickens whose meat you can sell.
It makes no sense for these 2 companies to sell the final chickens directly. They'd have to hatch tens of billions of chicks a year and ship them all over the world. Much easier to simply sell the grandparents and let farmers do the multiplying and pay for the farms, the feed and the labor.
And, you knew this was coming, there is also a China angle here: as you can imagine, China isn't too pleased to be dependent on foreign companies for such a basic food item as chicken.
So China did what China does best: long-term planning. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs launched a plan for "national broiler genetic improvement" (2021-2035), which aims for domestically bred breeds to make up at least 60% of the domestic market by 2035 (globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1…).
And, of course, they're ahead of the plan. As of 2025, homegrown breeds held more than 30% of the market: halfway to the 2035 goal in just four years (agripost.cn/2026/08/17/china…).
Can you escape all this as a consumer? Sure, you can buy organic or Label Rouge chicken, from slower-growing breeds raised for at least 81 days instead of 6 weeks, for two to three times the price.
Except, plot twist: the genetics behind most of those slow-growing birds come from a French company called Hubbard... which has belonged to Aviagen since 2018 (euromeatnews.com/aviagen-ann…)😅
And even if you could truly escape, you wouldn't want everyone to: we'd need vast new swathes of farmland, both for the chickens and their feed. Ironically, advocating for organic free-range chicken for everyone is one of the worst positions one can take for the planet's resources.
If you want to minimize your environmental footprint, the counterintuitive answer is to buy the cheapest supermarket chicken - or eat less meat, of course.
As my friend was saying last night, you may not like the way this industry works but, at the end of the day, it's what puts affordable protein on the plates of billions of people, using proportionally fewer resources than any other way of raising chicken.
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted
Racehorse wins debut — sparks backlash over name: ‘AUSTRIAN PAINTER’
Owner argued name had nothing to do with Hitler and honored Gustav Klimt
But when it was revealed he previously submitted ‘MY STRUGGLE’ and ‘BRAUNAU STAR,’ Jockey Club became doubtful
He is now ‘MERRYLEGS’
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted

☀️AliquisNovus☀️@PalmyrParSep 28
Europe
EuropeConnected via North America App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
“Euuuuuh housband, you make une salarie normale in Paris and can easily afford le conditionner automatique, mais you arbitrarily chôse not to buy eet, zo nous will suffer la heatwavè for pas réal raison”
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted
Can't get over the fact that Germans use "Biodeutsche" for "ethnic Germans".
Vilhelm Berg ☕🐓 retweeted
Imagine living in a place that was eternal summer
Nicholas Fabiano, MD@NTFabianoSep 26Canada
CanadaConnected via Canada App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Brain connectivity is highest in the fall and lowest in the summer
































