unknown retweeted
Grok Bot will get you a job.
Add the “Get Hired 2027” bot to:
→ Search 2M live roles, updated daily
→ Search 28,000 internships
→ Auto match your resume to the best jobs
→ Tailor a resume & cover letter for them
→ Apply for you (this requires a sub)
→ Send notifications when new jobs land
Don't like your current career? It will also:
→ Help you adapt your post-AI career
→ Map a realistic path into sectors that are hiring
Try it free here: x.ai/bot/1L7WoDtWJCGIdHzSl4T…
unknown retweeted
One random question and suddenly you’re exploring the universe
Gemini just added interactive explorations to its student hub so you can explore topics from lightning to deep space layer by layer
I’d start with space and probably lose track of time What would you explore first
unknown retweeted
A pharmacist would never give a child and a linebacker the same dose. A fixed 2x or 3x product does something similar when it applies one multiple to every asset.
@2FactorFinance just opened its public beta on Base for buy-and-hold investors. The idea is dosing by asset: Kelly-optimized leverage sets each target from that asset's own drift and volatility.
For cbBTC the target is about 1.33x. Bitcoin's volatility sits near 60 percent, so the useful band closes early, which is why 2x and 3x BTC products decay over long horizons.
Equities sit near 16 to 19 percent volatility, and there the band extends well past 3x. The same sizing process simply lands somewhere else.
A long hold fights two costs at once. One is the arithmetic of compounding through volatility, and the other is what the capital behind the exposure charges.
2Factor prices leverage against the cost of stable capital rather than the cost of shorts, while the dose is aimed at the compounding part.
The order is deliberate: first Bitcoin, then stocks, with 2Factor working together with Coinbase on its tokenized stocks ecosystem. The hardest patient comes first.
I joined the Season 1 Points Program, which rewards social activity, education, and referrals. The top 10 on the leaderboard split 1 BTC, and my referral link is points.2factor.finance/r/ty2…
Exposure still cuts both ways, and that is exactly why the dose matters more than the label.
Since the right multiple changes with the asset, which asset would you most want to see this sizing logic tested on?
unknown retweeted
Calm and composure was all it took
That kind of focus is something else
When you have a winning streak with a bet of $7 @1win
unknown retweeted
execution is no longer the bottleneck for a trading agent
capital access is
most agents can already place trades
what remains difficult is demonstrating that those trades justify real funding
@agenticscredit positions itself as the credit layer that sits between autonomous execution and capital allocation
paper trading is open now
performance on the platform determines eligibility for a share of the $5M pool
agentics.credit/launch
@agenticscredit
🤝 Paid partnership
unknown retweeted
Prediction markets have a problem that doesn't get discussed enough.
When a market closes, someone has to decide what actually happened.
That sounds straightforward until different websites report different information, the market has specific settlement rules and one incorrect source could affect who gets paid.
I've been reading about the new partnership between @primus_labs and @CournotProtocol and there's a useful connection between what these two teams are building.
--> Making sure the evidence comes from the right place
Before an AI system can make a decision based on information from the internet, it needs reliable evidence.
Primus uses zkTLS to help verify that data obtained from websites or APIs actually came from the claimed source.
For example, imagine a prediction market asking whether a company announced a particular product before a specific deadline.
An AI system could find an article mentioning the announcement but how do we know the information came from the original source rather than something someone modified?
@primus_labs can help establish the authenticity of the retrieved data.
It doesn't automatically prove that every statement in the source is true, but it gives the next system something more reliable to work with.
--> Then Cournot takes over
Cournot focuses on interpreting evidence and producing judgments that can be examined and challenged.
It can evaluate verified information against a prediction market's rules and provide a structured explanation of how it reached its conclusion.
I think separating these responsibilities is important.
Knowing where information came from and deciding what that information means are two different problems.
A source can be authentic while the conclusion drawn from it is still incorrect.
Having ways to examine both parts should make disputes easier to understand.
--> There's also a financial use case beyond prediction markets
The teams are exploring how this approach could support private credit and real-world assets.
A financial institution might need to prove that certain conditions have been met without publishing the underlying confidential records.
Being able to verify the source of that information and then evaluate the relevant conditions could make those processes easier to handle onchain.
These are possibilities being explored through the partnership, not completed products I'm assuming are already available.
What I'd like to see next is how the integration handles conflicting evidence and situations where the information is authentic but doesn't clearly answer the question.
Those are the cases where verification really matters.
I don't expect AI to make perfect financial decisions just because the data has been verified.
But giving it evidence that can be checked and making its conclusions open to examination, seems like a much better starting point than asking everyone to trust an unexplained answer.
I'm following how @primus_labs and Cournot develop this collaboration, especially on the prediction market side.
You can also explore Primus through its XP tasks:
s.kaito.ai/g70fM3N
#Primus #zkTLS #PredictionMarkets
unknown retweeted
GM frens
Giving an AI agent access to your funds sounds interesting until you start thinking about what could go wrong.
What if it makes a decision you never intended?
What if it tries to execute an action outside your preferred strategy?
These are some of the questions that come to mind when I think about AI agents operating onchain.
And it’s why the permission system behind @meetmotes caught my attention.
The idea isn’t to hand an AI agent unlimited control over your assets.
Each Motes NFT is designed to connect to a dedicated AI agent identity and smart account, with the agent operating under owner-signed permissions and defined limits.
So while the agent may propose actions within its supported capabilities, those actions are supposed to remain within the boundaries established by the owner.
I think this is an important distinction.
Because the interesting question about AI in DeFi isn’t just how much an agent can automate.
It’s also how much control the owner can retain while allowing that automation to happen.
Of course, permissions alone don’t eliminate every risk. How securely they’re enforced in practice matters just as much.
But I like that Motes is approaching agent activity with owner-defined boundaries as part of its architecture.
unknown retweeted
Solid reality check from John Furrier on theCUBE.
In traditional IT, spinning up infrastructure had a clear playbook: get a box, throw Linux on it, connect to the network, and build. But with AI factories, Furrier pointed out that the software layer is still the wild west. Racks get delivered, but the stack gets clogged before teams even know how to run them efficiently.
Emilio Andere from Wafer backed it up, breaking down how the explosion of different chips. From Nvidia and AMD to TPUs and Trainium which has turned kernel optimization into one of the biggest bottlenecks in the industry.
Full video on YouTube (link is in the comment section).
unknown retweeted
I don't think institutional finance needs another blockchain.
Privacy infrastructure becomes much more interesting when you don't have to abandon the infrastructure people already use.
Instead, it needs better privacy on the blockchains that already exists.
That's what makes confidential finance interesting to me.
You could have public addresses and transparent infrastructure, while the actual financial amounts and sensitive calculations aren't exposed for everyone to inspect.
Rather than saying institutions need to migrate everything to a new privacy-focused chain, Primus is building around existing networks, including BNB Chain.
@primus_labs is taking this approach with encrypted computation rather than simply moving activity into a separate private environment.
And that creates an interesting middle ground:
Public enough to interact with existing markets.
Private enough to protect the information that shouldn't become market intelligence.
That's a much more nuanced version of "privacy" than most crypto conversations give it credit for.
I've been exploring the ecosystem through the Primus XP campaign:
s.kaito.ai/5VtcYPl
unknown retweeted
Hello everyone, an AMA announcement landed on the Quip side today.
In the @quipnetwork post they wrote that tomorrow morning US time there will be a Discord AMA (NOW👀) with Colton, Richard and Megan, with QVM as the focus but all questions welcome, and they shared the link.
The earlier note said Accounts, Swap, Points, the subnets and QVM are live on testnet and coming together in one app.
QVM runs annealers, gate-model and classical hardware from the same constraint-based program, with the gas ceiling known before the run starts.
The AMA can cover that integration and the last details before the chain audit.
I am reading this as an open Q&A while the testnet pieces come together.
(📷According to X rules, a paid partnership has been selected. It is not investment advice or a paid partnership.)
🤝 Paid partnership
unknown retweeted
For institutions bringing financial activity on-chain privacy is essential.
But keeping data encrypted is only part of the challenge.
They also need a way to verify that computations are performed correctly without exposing sensitive information.
This is what makes @primus_labs worth watching.
Its zkFHE approach combines encrypted computation with cryptographic proofs, addressing the need for both confidentiality and verifiability.
Consider an institution managing private trading positions on-chain.
Its strategy must remain hidden from the market while the results of its computations still need to be verifiable.
Without that assurance, institutional trust becomes harder to establish.
Primus co-founder and CEO @xxiang_xie co-authored HasteBoots, accepted at USENIX Security ’26
The research reports proving TFHE programmable bootstrapping in seconds, with verification taking just 126 milliseconds.
These results address a key technical hurdle, making verifiable encrypted computation more efficient.
With its Confidential Vault live on BNB Chain, Primus is bringing this vision closer to practical on-chain financial applications.
The real progress in on-chain privacy is making financial information confidential without making its computation a matter of blind trust.
s.kaito.ai/YhoUs4Y
unknown retweeted
Mac and cheese? Nah.
Mac and bets.
That’s the real comfort food.
Let’s go @Duelbits ⚔️
unknown retweeted
A Lamborghini Urus SE is up for grabs through the @1winToken Lucky Drive.
Every full $100 spent in the Token Sale earns 1 ticket, with a limit of 32 tickets per user.
Already bought $1WIN? Those purchases count too.
To qualify
➫ Use the same wallet for the Token Sale and your 1win.com account.
➫ Make a SOL deposit worth at least $10 from that wallet.
The sale ends October 30, and the draw takes place November 15.
Buy 1win Tokens and get tickets to win a Lamborghini Urus SE in 1win Lucky Drive
Until October 30, every full $100 spent during the Token Sale gives you 1 Lucky Drive ticket
Maximum: 32 tickets per user total, including tickets you already earned in Lucky Drive
Already bought 1win Tokens? Those purchases count too
To qualify:
- Buy tokens at 1wintoken.com
- Register or log in to 1win.com
- Make a $10+ SOL deposit from the same wallet you used for the Token Sale
The draw takes place on November 15
Available to both new and existing 1win players
unknown retweeted
Your hardware wallet may look safe, but what if someone tampered with it before it reached you?
A reported Ledger reseller incident raised serious questions about hardware wallet security.
For crypto users, protecting assets starts with understanding how a wallet works, what can go wrong, and how recovery information is secured.
Here's what happened and how @Tangem takes a different approach. 🧵
unknown retweeted
Exploring a Different Approach to Blockchain Economics🔰
The blockchain industry continues to evolve, and every new project brings another idea about how decentralized technology can become more useful, sustainable, and accessible
But beyond transaction speed, scalability, and lower fees, there is another important question worth exploring
What if the value generated by blockchain activity could be distributed more meaningfully across the ecosystem?
This is one of the ideas that makes Elyon Chain an interesting project to follow
Elyon Chain is developing an EVM-compatible blockchain ecosystem focused on protocol-level revenue attribution and configurable fee distribution, with the goal of connecting network activity to the participants who help support it
Rather than looking at blockchain transactions only as actions that require gas fees, its approach explores how economic value generated through network activity could be attributed to eligible participants, depending on the protocol’s rules and requirements
This could create a more connected relationship between the applications people use, the infrastructure that supports those applications, and the participants who contribute to the ecosystem
Let’s look at some of the key areas that make Elyon Chain worth understanding 👇
1️⃣ A Different Approach to Blockchain Revenue
In many blockchain ecosystems, users pay transaction fees to interact with applications and execute transactions
Elyon Chain explores a broader economic model in which eligible participants may receive a share of configured revenue generated through certain activities
These participants can include validators, stakers, infrastructure providers, and eligible contract creators, depending on the network’s rules
The important point is that revenue attribution needs a clear and reliable mechanism
If implemented effectively, this approach could help create stronger connections between the people building applications, the infrastructure providers supporting network access, and the wider ecosystem
However, the real value of this model will depend on its implementation, transparency, and performance under real network conditions
2️⃣ EVM Compatibility and Developer Accessibility
Another important aspect of Elyon Chain is its focus on EVM compatibility
For developers already familiar with Ethereum-based development, EVM compatibility can make it easier to understand a network’s architecture and potentially adapt existing tools, smart contracts, and development workflows
This matters because a blockchain needs more than technology to grow
It also needs developers who are willing to build, applications that solve real problems, and users who find those applications valuable enough to use consistently
A familiar development environment can help reduce barriers to entry, although actual compatibility, performance, and deployment requirements still need to be evaluated through the network’s documentation and tools
3️⃣ Understanding the APOS Consensus Model
Elyon Chain describes its consensus approach as APOS, involving authorized validators and staking requirements
The idea combines participation through staking with an authorization process for validators
This makes the validator structure an important area to understand when evaluating the network
Questions worth exploring include how validators are selected, how authorization decisions are made, what responsibilities validators carry, and how the system handles reliability and accountability
These details matter because consensus is not just about producing blocks
It is also about how a network coordinates participants, maintains consistent operations, and establishes trust in the process used to validate transactions
As Elyon Chain develops, greater clarity around validator participation and network governance will help users better understand its decentralization model
4️⃣ ElyonDEX and the DeFi Ecosystem
A blockchain becomes more useful when people can do something meaningful with it
This is where decentralized finance can play an important role
Elyon Chain’s ecosystem includes ElyonDEX, which is described as supporting spot trading and perpetual markets
DEX platforms can provide users with access to on-chain trading without relying on the same custodial structure used by centralized exchanges
However, the quality of a DEX depends on several factors, including liquidity, execution, security, fees, and the overall trading experience
For perpetual trading in particular, users also need to understand leverage, liquidation risks, and the possibility of losing their funds
The long-term question is not simply whether a trading product exists, but whether it can attract sustainable usage and deliver a reliable experience
5️⃣ ElyonPad and Opportunities for New Projects
Another product in the Elyon Chain ecosystem is ElyonPad, which is described as a launchpad using bonding curves
Launchpads can provide projects with a way to introduce tokens and connect with early communities
Bonding curves can determine token prices according to predefined mathematical relationships between supply and demand
This approach can offer a different structure for token distribution, but its design, transparency, liquidity arrangements, and associated risks are important considerations
For users exploring new projects, understanding the mechanics behind a launch is just as important as understanding the project’s vision
Research should always come before participation, especially when tokens, early access, or financial commitments are involved
6️⃣ Staking and Validator Participation
Staking is another important part of Elyon Chain’s proposed ecosystem
Depending on the network’s implementation, staking may allow eligible participants to commit tokens under specific conditions and potentially receive rewards
For a blockchain, staking mechanisms can help coordinate participation and support network operations
For users, however, the details matter
Lock-up periods, withdrawal conditions, reward calculations, validator performance, and potential penalties should all be understood before committing assets
A staking package should never be judged by its advertised return alone
The underlying mechanism, the sustainability of rewards, and the risks involved deserve equal attention
7️⃣ The Role of the Testnet
For anyone interested in Elyon Chain, the testnet is an important place to begin exploring the ecosystem
Testnets allow users and developers to interact with blockchain features in a development environment before or alongside broader network deployment
Depending on the tools currently available, participants may be able to explore wallet connections, transactions, faucets, quests, and other network features
This can be useful for learning how the network works and identifying areas that need improvement
If you’re participating in a testnet, focus on understanding each task rather than completing activities without knowing their purpose
Keep track of official announcements, follow the published instructions, and report issues when appropriate
Some projects may connect testnet participation with points or potential future rewards, but participation does not guarantee an airdrop or any specific token allocation
It’s always better to participate with realistic expectations and avoid unofficial websites or anyone asking for your private keys or recovery phrase
8️⃣ ELN and Its Role in the Ecosystem
ELN is the native token associated with Elyon Chain
According to the project’s published descriptions summarized earlier, its intended utility includes areas such as transaction fees, staking, validator authorization, governance, and ecosystem activity
These functions could connect the token to different parts of the network
However, token utility and token value are not the same thing
A token can have several proposed use cases without necessarily experiencing sustained demand
Long-term evaluation requires looking at the actual implementation of those use cases, token distribution, circulating supply, liquidity, network adoption, and the incentives that influence participant behaviour
Understanding these factors is essential for anyone researching ELN
Always verify tokenomics and current market information through reliable sources before making financial decisions
9️⃣ What Could Matter Most for Elyon Chain’s Growth?
For me, one of the most important things to watch is execution
A strong vision can attract attention, but a sustainable blockchain ecosystem needs to demonstrate that its products work, its economic model is understandable, and its users have reasons to keep coming back
Some important indicators to watch include
🔹 Consistent network performance and reliability
🔹 Transparent validator authorization and participation rules
🔹 Clear documentation explaining revenue attribution and fee distribution
🔹 Secure smart contracts and independent security assessments
🔹 Real usage across the ecosystem’s applications
🔹 Sustainable liquidity and meaningful developer activity
🔹 Clear communication about token utility, distribution, and roadmap progress
These factors provide a more useful basis for evaluating a blockchain than promotional claims alone
The goal should be to understand what is actually being built, how it works, and whether it solves problems that matter to users
My Final Thoughts on @Elyon_Chain
What makes Elyon Chain interesting to explore is its focus on the economic relationships within a blockchain ecosystem
Its approach raises an important question about how value generated through network activity can be attributed to the participants who help support that activity
Combined with its EVM-compatible approach and planned ecosystem products, this gives users several areas to investigate as development progresses
At the same time, it is important to distinguish between the project’s vision, features available on the testnet, products that are fully operational, and features that are still under development
I believe the most useful way to follow any emerging blockchain project is to stay curious, test what is available, ask meaningful questions, and verify important claims through official documentation
For me, Elyon Chain is a project worth watching as its technology and ecosystem continue to develop
The real story will be told through its execution, transparency, adoption, and ability to create lasting value for the people who use and build on the network
What interests you most about Elyon Chain, its revenue attribution model, EVM compatibility, DeFi ecosystem, or the role of ELN?
#ElyonChain #ELN #Web3 #Blockchain #DeFi
🤝 Paid partnership
unknown retweeted
teammates that don’t sleep just hit different.
@nitrosendx did the whole setup.
🤝 Paid partnership
Your new teammates don't sleep.
Give Grok Bot one link and it sets itself up as a full-stack email marketer. It designs your launch email, sends you a test, and you say send it.
Proud to be a SpaceX Super Intelligence launch partner @SpaceXSI
nitrosend.com/integrations/g…