Elections are a contract between people and their government. The contract is that the people will abide by laws made by the government as long as the government is comprised of representatives from the people. Election fraud violates the contract. Corrupted election infrastructure, regardless of outcome, also violates the contract. Using corrupted infrastructure over the objections of the people is a violation of the contract. No contract is valid if one or both parties does not agree to the terms or is coerced into signing. Certifying elections governed in a manner that is rejected by a majority of the people, or even a significant minority, violates the concept of consensual agreement. Electronic voting is a mechanism that cannot ever be transparent enough for people to give informed consent to its use. On that basis alone, the practice should be banned immediately worldwide. In addition, any country that uses electronic voting should be shunned by the international community, banned from the UN, all trading deals halted, etc. The Brazilian election results yesterday warrant immediate isolation of the country, and the full extirpation of the communist tumor that has grown within it.

Oct 27, 2026 · 5:29 PM UTC

5
41
2
136
1,324
RelevantRecentLikes
By the same token every blue state election should be considered fraud.
12
63
"by consent of the governed". implicitly relies on the court of public opinion and that relies on faith in free and fair elections. a governance that ignores the verification of voters has usurped it's own authority. It has thrown out the receipts of their own jurisdiction.
3
To be a little more exact, it is better to say that fraud vitiates the contract.
9
This is what I have been saying for years. Consent of the Governed is revoked inherently by the act of fraudulent and or unconstitutional elections. Breach of contract fits as well.
5
When you import Hatians & Somalians, elections are now simply a tribal power grab.
1
8