CoffeeSoul विप्रः

Mr Modi, stop lying to this nation. You became PM because of foreign help. You remain PM because of foreign help. Your financial system is fully controlled and supported by foreigners. Foreign social media fully backs you. I challenge you to an open debate about this. Any stage, any time. Come if you have the guts. You won't dare, because you are terrified of what I know about you. मोदी जी, इस देश से झूठ बोलना बंद कीजिए। आप विदेशी मदद से प्रधानमंत्री बने। और विदेशी मदद से ही प्रधानमंत्री बने हुए हैं। आपकी आर्थिक व्यवस्था पूरी तरह विदेशियों के नियंत्रण में और समर्थन से है। विदेशी सोशल मीडिया पूरी तरह आपके साथ खड़ा है। मैं आपको इस मुद्दे पर खुली बहस की चुनौती देता हूं। कोई भी मंच, किसी भी समय। हिम्मत है तो आइए। आप नहीं आएंगे, क्योंकि जो मैं आपके बारे में जानता हूं आप उससे डरते हैं।

BJP buffoons fall prey so easily In communication, deliberate misspelling is a strategy to gain attention. It’s called Typo Marketing. Thank you for amplifying @RahulGandhi ji’s tweet on Tata by desperately pointing out Sitaraman misspelt. Hahhahaha!

IIRC, not a single state has added massive numbers of electors in the rolls after the SIR. Where have those marked permanently shifted, gone? Is India’s population lesser than what we think it is? The math is not mathing.

“Ah Sharjeel Imam is a dangerous radical!” *looks inside* >it’s calling for decentralising power to the provinces, proportional representation for minority voices to be heard, extensive discussion of electoral politics in Bihar, the AIMIM making false equivalences etc.

Read the full Sharjeel Imam interview. There's a fair amount of his critiques that I partially agree with and has been a critique by other scholars and researchers. I disagree with a lot of his ideas of how to fix it, but treating it as "omg he's dangerous" is absurd

Criticising Sharjeel is easier than constructively engaging with his ideas and thoughts. In the end, the Constitution is not some infallible document, but you are not ready to have that conversation.

Mr Gupta like many others needs to understand the vantage point Sharjeel coming from. And need to ask themselves why this discomfort with Sharjeel's politics. I'd like to remind them of a few things: 1. Sharjeel is not just a political activist but also a researcher and student of History. And as a scholar and intellectual he is well within his rights to give a different interpretation of history. A critique of the constitution is well within the rights of all citizens of this country. 2. Sharjeel @_imaams interpretation is coming from being a member of a minority community and he articulates the lived reality of generations of Muslims in our country. We probably need to ask ourselves if the reason it makes us so uncomfortable is because there is truth in his ideas? Why can't people treat Muslim rights as a universal, human rights issue? Why is Sharjeel being hounded as an Islamist when he is talking about human values but in the context of a certain community? The concept of a standpoint theorization should not be such a surprise to anybody who understands critical thinking. #SharjeelImam

India’s per capita GDP estimated below Bangladesh in 2026: IMF [One of the most urgent short term goals for Indian economic planners should be to make sure Indians become richer than Bangladeshis. A more long term and much tougher plan should be to make East India's GDP/capita same as Bangladesh's.] scroll.in/latest/1096462/ind…