Ikepo retweeted
I can do a 10 part deep dive series on this run way. Everybody is saying Schiaparelli was on the mood board and that’s true but these are actually George hobieka’s nachos.
They are clever enough to go across seasons tho. We need to do better.
middle aged women swear they are so good at hiding passive aggression. and unfortunately for them they always catch me on a bad day
Ikepo retweeted
Once again imprecise language is how most of the world communicates. Let’s please give people some grace.
so cnc
Freeuse is a form of sexual play that is done by two people(or more).
One person gives full sexual consent at any time of any day(at least until they call it off) for their partner(s) to engage with them sexually without asking, or letting them know. It’s not CNC but it can tie into somnophilia, a sleep sex fetish.
So example.
Cooking in the kitchen. Partner comes right behind you and bends you over without a word. You can’t complain. That’s freeuse.
Ikepo retweeted
If I say my class is a zoo and you respond by saying the students are not animals.
You’re clearly an idiot. And there’s nothing else to say.
Esq, distinguishing figurative intent from literal, is simple. And please, drop your abstract examples of metaphor; the case at hand involves two real, verifiable conditions.
If a teacher says 'my class is a zoo,' and a staff says 'no, students are not animals,' the teacher won’t produce animal charts to prove her point, she just laughs and says 'it’s just a figure of speech.'
But when Mum Zee said 'pregnancy is not a death sentence' and people kept giving cases of maternal mortality to prove her wrong. You didn’t take that as a sign that the exchange wasn’t about a metaphor but a literal assertion of fact??.
When a dispute is fought using factual evidence, it is a literal debate over actual outcomes, not a literary exercise. You don’t use factual evidence to argue “the class is a zoo”, nor “life is a journey” nau😂.
It was AFTER sufficient medical opinion saturated the air on the subject that they tried taking the “literary” license to evade the critic of the travesty.