SGM (@_sgm600) header
SGM (@_sgm600) profile picture

🇦🇺 Sacred sites, rituals, people. "the bright milling snow, which throngs the air today— / It is a way of leaving, so as to stay."

Sydney, Australia
Joined January 2025
Photo by SGM (@_sgm600)Photo by SGM (@_sgm600)Photo by SGM (@_sgm600)Photo by SGM (@_sgm600)Photo by SGM (@_sgm600)Photo by SGM (@_sgm600)
Can you still find a view like this in Sydney? Very idyllic.
North Sydney Harbour, 1908 By James R. Jackson 🇦🇺
5
3
99
1,869
So you’re saying that the presence of foreigners in one’s country skews the political landscape against the interests of the native majority? Fancy that.
1
2
1
15
572
Thank you Pauline Hanson for not only delivering humour but also hard hitting facts during these cartoons. No wonder the media class hate them.
134
525
26
2,955
41,490
Great article on a nations identity. Nations will not fight for abstract values. Men fight for their families, their kin and the continuity of their own people.
Why should British men be expected to fight for a country whose political leadership appears embarrassed by and increasingly hostile to their national identity? For decades, Britons concerned about immigration, demographic transformation, cultural displacement, and the erosion of their national inheritance have been branded racists, far-right extremists, and even Nazis by the political establishment. They have been told to celebrate diversity, while their own desire for cultural continuity has been met with accusation and condemnation. They have been told that Britain belongs to the world, that their homeland is everyone’s homeland, and that their national identity is available to anyone who wishes to claim it. When the British people seek to preserve their own distinct identity, culture, and inheritance for future generations, their efforts are increasingly treated not merely as objectionable, but potentially criminal. And now, after decades of promoting a conception of Britain in which national identity is increasingly detached from ancestry, history, and inherited culture, the establishment wants its sons to prepare for war. caldronpool.com/p/britain-wa…
2
13
233
The “right wing” of Australia and the west try to always be so morally upright, so rule and law abiding, and so noble, yet they are playing against cheating opposition. They don’t afford us the same noble decency, sportsmanship or respect. The table is tilted. The game is rigged. The dice is loaded. Get with the programme you old conservatives and realise the left has won for the past 80 years and has destroyed everything. You have conserved and protected nothing about our past, our heritage or our culture.
“If Flávio Bolsonaro truly believes in the rule of law, he should return to Brazil and submit himself to a thorough investigation into whatever unspecified allegations the authorities may choose to pursue.”
9
8
1
133
1,384
Former Church of St Simon and St Jude, Surry Hills, just before demolition in 1928; and the same view today, now Harmony Park. There’s a plaque and photo where the church once stood.
1
3
12
352
The Anglo-Celtic nations of the world still boast a great deal of latent power. Now is the time to use it 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇨🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧
46
249
15
1,462
20,873
Farage: "If those Restore supporters online see that we are the only vehicle, genuinely on the centre-right, that can beat the Labour Party and come back to us, then our polling will start to look very different, very quickly." Here's what Farage doesn't understand. We are not a "centre-right" party. Our voters are not "centre-right." The country was governed by the "centre-right" for 14 years, and they brought us to the brink of destruction. The "centre-right" are, in many ways, the greatest traitors of all. The Left are at least honest about their intentions towards us; the "centre-right" dress it up in a pinstripe suit and posh accent. But their ideology will still see us reduced to a hated and marginalised minority in our own homeland. You are not going to win our voters over by appealing to the "centre-right." We are radicals. We don't care what the "centre" thinks of us. In fact, we despise them. If Farage is serious about this, perhaps he should reconsider the offer we made him in August.
394
1,240
91
9,131
162,414
"Now, many will agree that there is something very wrong with the current state of our nation. An increasing number of Australians believe the country is on the wrong track, and they will even admit that this is largely due to the government’s immigration policies. They’ll acknowledge multiculturalism has divided our communities into nations within nations, that diversity has undermined national unity, and that the Australia we all know and love is at risk of being lost for good. But when it comes to offering a solution to that very visible problem, all we are given are meaningless platitudes and a lot of talk about some vague and arbitrary concept of “Aussie values.” Today we have just about everyone on the right of Labor talking tough about immigration reforms, but whenever they’re asked what they mean and what it will look like, it always comes back to a “values” test. Now, aside from the fact that no one is really able to define what these “Aussie values” are, or where these “values” originate, what we are effectively being told through their imagined “solution” is that the Anglo-Celtic people of Australia are inconsequential. We are being told that the descendants of Australia’s founding stock are unnecessary—that it doesn’t matter who inherits the house, provided they like Rugby, barbecues, and waving the Aussie flag. That is to say, we’re being told that Anglo-Celtic Australians are interchangeable. In other words, what they are saying is that if every Anglo-Celtic Australian were to be replaced by foreigners, the nation itself would remain the same, provided the new imports subscribed to 'Aussie values.' Of course, this is an absurd assertion, and its implications are untenable. Follow it to its logical conclusion, and you arrive at a definition of 'Australian' in which foreigners living in foreign nations can be considered more Australian than the descendants of Australia’s first settlers. Why? Because being Australian is no longer a matter of ancestry, heritage, or belonging, but of subscribing to whatever vague collection of 'Aussie values' happens to be fashionable at the time." Read more: A People and a Faith: Why Western Civilisation Needs Both - Evelyn Rae at BACPAC 2026 @Brit_Aus_Com caldronpool.com/p/a-people-a…
6
10
1
34
1,570
Bentley Estate. Chudleigh, Tasmania 🇦🇺
3
13
2
222
3,763
The first official visit of the new US Ambassador to Australia was to the Australian War Memorial. Inside Amb. Brat is photographed praying. Our ties are not blood itself, but joint sacrifice of it in our evergreen mission to hold this continent against Asian imperialism.
It's official: Ambassador Brat presented his credentials to Governor-General, Her Excellency Sam Mostyn AC in a ceremony on Tuesday, before getting straight to work advancing President Trump's priorities, which include deepening the U.S.-Australia Alliance. His first official visit was to the Australian War Memorial (AWM), where he and his wife Laura laid a wreath. AWM Director Matt Anderson gave profoundly moving testimony about the sacrifice made by Australian service members. For more than a century, our nations have stood together in times of conflict and peace. In the evening, Ambassador Brat hosted a reception for the finalists of the 2026 AmCham Alliance Awards, recognizing the emerging industry leaders and innovators helping to strengthen our alliance. “Our two nations are investing in each other more than ever before, and our economic ties have never been stronger,” Ambassador Brat said.
16
14
246
5,180
BACPAC 2026: A People and a Faith, Why Western Civilisation Needs Both - Evelyn Rae, Commentator at @CaldronPool.
5
19
2
113
2,767
These carved stones are kept inside St Mary's Church in Acton, Cheshire 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Dating from around 1080–1100, they are over 900 years old and feature Christian figures, birds and intricate interlaced patterns. Some were discovered during restoration work in the 1890s, having been built into the church walls centuries earlier 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
13
75
5
399
4,380
SGM retweeted
'[Shakespeare] certainly read the Bible, in the Genevan version of 1560, from an early age. He certainly read, all his life, everything he could get his hands on. He played games, fished, hunted, observed rural life as it has rarely been observed by anyone else.' From John Berryman's Shakespeare lectures
21
3
157
4,927