Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham) header
Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham) profile picture

‘Freak of all trades’ | Building The Final Factory | prev @Stanford @EPFL

Palo Alto, CA
Joined July 2025
Photo by Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham)Photo by Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham)Photo by Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham)Photo by Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham)Photo by Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham)Photo by Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham)Photo by Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham)Photo by Alexandre Carlhammar (@acarlham)
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
Replying to @emm0sh
Yes, the only way this is solved is by looping in the data from deployed assembly line.
1
3
191
We just took #1 on CADGenBench, the leading benchmark for parts engineering. huggingface.co/spaces/Huggin… We developed a SOTA CAD generation harness through a novel predictor-corrector architecture.
11
16
5
145
31,921
The model proposes the part. A deterministic geometry kernel then verifies the B-rep against dimensional and topological constraints that two independent agents extract from the drawing. We also reinforced the system on large libraries of real manufacturing and assembly-line data that we collected. More on it soon.
1
2
14
1,134
My kind of people
1
18
784
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
Anthropic Launches Claude for Manufacturing
70
75
34
1,793
207,529
Low-volume, high-mix manufacturing presents 3 fundamental challenges for automation: - Design: Products aren’t designed for automated assembly. - Deployment: Automated assembly lines are bespoke to individual products, with little skill transfer to new products. - Flexibility: Adapting lines to changes in product design, supply variance, etc. is incredibly difficult. We’re fixing this. More on it soon.
A top-level @anduriltech exec shared at dinner tonight that they use little to no automation in their manufacturing facilities because “automation today is incapable of adapting to low-volume and high complexity production lines” There’s still such a gap between the automation dream and what is technically possible today.
7
2
1
97
381,028
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
Don't get lost in the sauce. Focus on what you can control: 1. The folks in your corner. 2. Your personal relationships 3. Executing your purpose / mission. Let's rip it. Time to build.
7
3
55
1,841
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
Factories of the future will not only be factories As the performance of design automation tools increases, manufacturers will start moving more upstream. Design, simulation and testing will all get compacted into one comp. The manufacturer will design the parts The manufacturer will simulate the part The manufacturer will manufacture the part The manufacturer will test the part Not every manufacturer will be able to profit from this consolidation though.
1
3
1
22
1,749
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
"getting it manufactured still required several rounds of review and iteration" yes, welcome to the real world. we could have solved rsi and it won't matter. the only thing that solves this will be factories.
Replying to @OpenAI
Two OpenAI team members worked with GPT-6 Astra to design a prototype device for talking to Codex in under a week, as a side project. Astra designed the enclosure, circuit board, interface, and software. Getting it manufactured still required several rounds of review and iteration.
15
7
224
10,864
Imagine the magic you could create if you also had manufacturing signals in the loop…👀
1
4
628
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
You cannot scale manufacturing without systems and scaleable processes. If there's a problem, you have to attack it right away with a solution that is easily repeatable across hundreds of new hires. Very hard to do. But if you do it, you will win.
13
17
5
270
9,332
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
Today, we are introducing Fern: our first model that supports up to 10M tokens in context window!🌿 You could put an entire repository (or repositories!) in the context, continue to work on problems for days without hitting compaction limits or use it to consolidate other agents’ works. 
 As always, we have a lot more work to do but wanted to give you the update. Excited hear how you would use a 10M token context window.
Introducing Fern, Mirendil’s first model: pretrained from scratch, with up to 10M tokens of context! That’s ~0.5M lines of code (roughly Megatron-LM scale) or days of an agent’s work, all in context at once. Its first version, Fern 0.1, had a short round of post-training 🚢
11
13
1
173
8,357
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
9
527
22
3,415
49,890
From thinking of a product, captured through BCI, to generatively designed products (CAD, PCB) and co-designed assembly lines, all within a shared agentic engineering and manufacturing harness (FEA, CFD, DFM, …). Bidirectional signals across the entire system, continuously co-optimizing product and factory for cost, throughput and volume. Driving the distance between thought and physical reality to zero. Soon, this won’t be science fiction.
2
7
5,352
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
Hey anduril
We made this omnidirectional "swerve" robot that's about 2.5 inches thick. It's holonomic, meaning it can move in any direction, spin in any direction, simultaneously. There is a quick swap turret with slip ring that gives it even more agility. planning on an especially fun attachment soon, but you can add cameras, lidar, robotic arms, lasers, to name a few. Files are free on my ko-fi. Mechanical BOM is just $110 Even with electronics it's well below $200. For comparison, most robotics competitions use swerve modules (this one has four such modules), and each individual module costs about $500-$1000. Part of the reason i hate competition robotics Swerve is in no way new but what about a thin slab one? Wondering if there are any actual use cases of this thing. Built with @JamesMakes29, Thank you @Willqyu at The Standard Manufacturing Company for helping support Additionally, thank you LDO motors, SendCutSend, PCBWay.
35
44
11
1,121
36,877
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
There is a missing link here. Modern manufacturing is built on programmable, generalisable machines. CNC mills, lathes, lasers, and more. One machine can make many parts. 1/5
the evolution of production is pretty clear: solve design/quoting and have it connected to a factory, immediate margin visibility, fabrication strategies and sequencing to reinforce zero rework/oneshotting every job. extremely scalable, multiples on these will skyrocket.
7
7
80
118,496
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
the reality is (a) true reindustrialization requires you to completely rebuild production methods from scratch with new tech, (b) part (a) takes a shitload of r&d, (c) only once you've proven a better method should you scale it, (d) these companies are far more valuable than PE multiples, (e) taking over someone's machines for revenue is fine but isn't really solving anything
Pre-seed valuations in reindustrialization are climbing, even before prototypes or production. At these valuations, why not take a PE approach after the raise? Acquire machine shops from retiring owners. Get revenue, skilled labor, equipment, and production capacity on day one. Build your new products on the night shift while expanding capacity. When equipment lead times are a major bottleneck, buying existing capacity could be a massive advantage. I think we’re about to see a new monster emerge. A hybrid of venture capital and private equity built for American reindustrialization.
17
15
2
208
8,954
Was a pleasure presenting at CAD+AI. Future of genCAD is closed-loop product gen with manufacturing signals so the parts are actually DFM. More on it soon.
1
1
14
1,378
Alexandre Carlhammar retweeted
it's gonna be pretty interesting once people decompile every single piece of CAD/CAM and simulation software
179
329
70
3,746
138,576
This 👇
if you wanna make a billion dollars you need to set up last mile manufacturing for vibe engineered products
1
5
398
The unit economics for this are hard to scale, though. It should be combined with active probing to figure out which products work and reconfigure the factory on the go.
1
237