adam retweeted
I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.
I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.
Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.
However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.
When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.
The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.
Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?
I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.
The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.
Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.
“I think she’s going to find that you can’t sit on the fence... The real win is when ordinary people can say these things.”
@DerryBanShee speaks to @joshxhowie about Emma Watson’s comments about JK Rowling.
📺 youtu.be/r2OGEITYe2Y
adam retweeted
Digital ID for every adult is not progress. It is the end of a free society dressed up as convenience.
I am a cyber security specialist. This is my take.
They are selling it as a fix for illegal migration. That is bollocks.
We spend hundreds of billions a year on cyber security and yet the volume of breaches is breaking records. The threat is growing faster than the spend.
Digital ID will not stop boats. It will not stop trafficking gangs. It will not fix a broken border.
Criminals will work around it.
Honest citizens will pay the price.
It builds giant data banks that track where you go, what you buy, what you read and who you speak to.
It links your identity to every checkpoint in daily life.
One breach and your life is exposed.
Look at Jaguar Land Rover and the airports in recent weeks. Now imagine that at national scale on an ID system tied to everything you need to live your daily life.
Here is the risk that ministers will not admit.
Ransomware seeded through a supplier or an insider:
It lies quiet for months.
It rolls through the backups.
On trigger day the register and the recovery sets are both encrypted.
Payments fail. Health and benefits stall. Borders slow. Citizens are frozen out until a ransom is paid or the state rebuilds from scratch.
Centralise identity and you centralise failure.
Do not fall for the pitch.
Function creep is certain.
It starts as login.
It becomes access to money, travel, speech and public services.
It turns rights into permissions controlled by the state and its contractors.
It creates a single point of failure for criminals, insiders and hostile states to target.
It will punish the elderly, the poor and anyone who is not always online.
It will centralise risk and outsource blame.
It will not stop fraud.
It will not stop illegal migration.
It will build the machinery for a social credit system by stealth.
If ministers cared about the border, they would enforce current laws, resource patrols and processing, close loopholes and remove those with no right to stay.
You do not need a national ID to do any of that.
We scrapped ID cards in 2010 for a reason.
Britain does not need a central register to prove age or status.
Yes to privacy first proofs. No to a database state.
adam retweeted
If you went along with the covid bollocks, you now have a chance to redeem yourself by saying NO to digital ID.
adam retweeted
Anyone supporting digital ID is retarded, will benefit financially from it or is just a cunt. Whatever, they can all fuck off.
adam retweeted
So let me get this straight. In 2020, a black man dies under a cop’s knee, racial motives unconfirmed, media explodes, riots nationwide, cities burn.
A few days ago, a young white girl is killed, the killer mumbles “got the white girl”, and we get MSM silence. No headlines, no outrage, just Twitter anons discussing it.
What kind of sinister double standard is this???? What’s happening??
adam retweeted
Every single person in the whole world should be as angry as @joerogan is right now, everyone.
adam retweeted
Really incredible how every politician and political commentator arguing about the factors contributing to Britain's financial woes, points to absolutely everything EXCEPT the fact that the entire economy was shut down for two years while billions were wasted on testing, furlough and poisonous injections.
adam retweeted
Violent criminals being released early from prison to make space for people that write hurty words on social media! Are you all enjoying Starmergeddon yet 🤷♂️
adam retweeted
Piers Morgan:- “Would you like to take this opportunity to tell the rioters to stop rioting?”
adam retweeted
I voted Reform.
I keep seeing posts “EVERYONE WHO VOTED REFORM IS RACIST.”
I’m Polish, well, technically more Greek/Albanian than Polish. But I was born and raised in Poland.
I legally immigrated to the UK 13 years ago. I’ve always worked, sometimes multiple jobs at once. I’ve paid hundreds of thousands in taxes. I integrated into their society, learned the language, and ultimately gained British citizenship.
Over a year ago the government shut the four-star spa hotel, in the small village where I live to allocate it to “asylum seekers”. Ultimately many people lost their jobs.
I can’t go to the gym in the hotel anymore because it’s shut. My daughter can’t have swimming lessons there because the swimming pool is closed.
So-called asylum seekers don’t integrate into British culture or society. They don’t speak English. They occupy the parks and playgrounds. They are mostly young and fit men, women and children are the minority. Those young men stare at my body when walking past me. I don’t feel safe letting my daughter bike to school by herself anymore.
I don’t want my taxes to go towards illegal immigrants. I’d rather our roads be fixed, schools and hospitals have better funding. I’d rather the government look after their people first. That should be the priority of each and every government WORLDWIDE. If that makes me racist, so be it.
I don’t agree with the WEF. Whoever openly opposes their globalist agenda in my books, is a hero we need right now. If that makes me racist, so be it.
I don’t agree with gender ideology being taught at school. Children are impressionable, and their young minds can be easily manipulated, confused and swayed. There’s nothing sexual about school children, and sexual ideologies should be kept out of primary schools. If that makes me racist, so be it.
I don’t agree with the anti-meat, anti-dairy, anti-farming agendas. We need our farmers. If that makes me racist, so be it.
I don’t agree with de-banking, lockdowns, cancel culture and a cashless society. There’s a thin line between excessive government control and the erosion of our freedoms. If that makes me racist, so be it.
I wanted a pro-business and pro-entrepreneurship government. They create jobs and fuel our economy. If that makes me racist, so be it.
adam retweeted
NOW INCOMING:
UBI
DIGITAL ID
DIGITAL CURRENCY
CLIMATE LOCKDOWNS
BIRD FLU PLANDEMIC
GREEN AGENDA TRAVEL CREDITS
15 MINUTE CITIES
NET ZERO OVERDRIVE
GARDEN TAX
AGENDA 2030
BUT YOU WEREN’T PAYING ATTENTION
adam retweeted
'Look up, see for yourselves and demand the government give us back our clear skies.'
Big Shout out to GP Taylor for doing some actual journalism.
Full story in The Yorkshire Post:
According to the Met Office, from October 2022 to March 2024, the highest amount of rain has fallen in any 18-month period in England in recorded history. The soil is waterlogged, and crops are likely to fail.
Yet, all around the world, governments and billionaires are playing God and messing with the weather. Saudi Arabia and the UAE are both systematically seeding the sky to bring rain on the desert to maintain a supply of fresh water.
The preliminary studies of rainfall resulting from Saudi cloud seeding indicate precipitation of 3.5 billion cubic metres of water have fallen to create new water sources, increase green space and intensify vegetation to mitigate desertification and drought.
The cloud seeding has been so successful that the Saudi National Centre of Meteorology issued a red warning (the highest on a four-tier scale) for heavy rainfall and strong winds on April 6. This is following the desert state flooding in January.
These weather experiments have been taking place throughout the world, often funded by billionaires wanting to fight global warming. This is not a conspiracy theory. Reputable news outlets have recently covered the story of weather modification.
Bill Gates is backing high-altitude experiments of solar geoengineering, which mimics the effects of a giant volcanic eruption. Thousands of planes would fly at high altitudes, spraying millions of tons of particles around the planet to create a massive chemical cloud that would cool the surface. Some experts have warned that playing God with the weather could cause mass flooding in some areas and drought in others.
In 1952, Britain suffered a disaster following cloud seeding. One of the worst flash floods ever to have occurred in Britain swept through the Devon village of Lynmouth. Thirty-five people died as a torrent of 90m tons of water and thousands of tons of rock poured off saturated Exmoor and into the village destroying homes, bridges, shops, and hotels.
According to the BBC, new evidence from previously classified government files suggests that a team of scientists working with the RAF were experimenting with artificial rainmaking in southern Britain in the same week. Operation Cumulus was suspended immediately after the disaster.
Yet, despite the government denying that geoengineering is taking place in the skies above our heads, many people are now believing otherwise.
As an avid sky watcher, I have noticed that since 2015 (never saw this before then) there are a growing number of jet contrails, especially when there is a cloudless sky. I have watched and photographed the same large jet going backwards and forwards along the coast at Filey. It did this for nearly an hour before it switched off its contrail and flew south.
The clear sky is left with a patchwork of contrails that don’t disappear and cause a phenomenon called contrail cirrus. Within the hour, the clouds thicken blocking out the sun. Often this leads to rain.
I have seen this happen many times, but whenever I speak to someone in authority about this, I am met with a brick wall of denial and silence, even though there are aeronautical companies in this country who advertise this service. There is a growing library of evidence from whistle-blowers involved in these operations and the internet is full of videos taken inside the planes showing the equipment used.
Around the world, the concept of cloud engineering is being discussed. Although controversial, some think that trying to mimic the impacts of a volcano eruption is a viable way to control global warming. This proposed type of climate geoengineering is called stratospheric aerosol injection. According to CBS News, it could lower the temperature by one degree. Tennessee lawmakers have recently voted to ban geoengineering. The Mexican government that it would “prohibit and, where appropriate, stop experimentation practices with solar geoengineering”.
What nobody knows is what does this do to our weather in Yorkshire? It is all very well and good to attempt to cool the world, but at what cost to our farmers and growers? The change in the weather is not down to global warming but more like global interference.
As a retired police officer, I believe the available evidence that the weather is being tampered with is overwhelming and added to the government's denials is very worrying.
It is time that billionaires and governments stopped playing with the weather before we are hit with years of deluge and then drought. Look up, see for yourselves and demand the government give us back our clear skies.
Full article is in the thread.
Top man. Well done mate.
Please repost.
