Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes) profile picture

SEO full-time since 2019. Get sales calls from Google, ChatGPT & Reddit 👉 https://nitter.cf/t.co/8fWebjdVkM

England, United Kingdom
Joined January 2020
Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)Photo by Adam Crookes SEO (@adcrookes)
SEO Roast for SaaS Website 🔥 - 6 action items in 60 seconds. - I always start with low-hanging fruit. - I've recorded SEO roasts since 2019. - My full private recordings are ~15 mins.
3
3
14
5,258
Do self-promotional listicles earn brand mentions in Google's AI Overviews? I tested 89 B2B “best X services” queries and found: 38% of searches cited a self-promotional listicle. 47% of cited listicles ranked their own brand first. 35% received a brand mention in Google’s AI Overviews. In many of the listicles I read through, I saw things like: Co-authors with clear identities and credentials. First-hand proof of testing products/services with original data. Outbound links to authoritative, primary, or peer-reviewed sources. These are pretty standard E-E-A-T signals. If you’re not really being that helpful and it’s a clear self-promotion play, Google’s algorithm doesn't have much incentive to cite your listicle.
9
5
4,094
Higgsfield reached $1B ARR in 18 months with a 150-person content team driving every launch and announcement.
Higgsfield have scaled to $1BN in ARR in 18 months; that is faster than Cursor. But did you know they have over 150 people in content production alone? For every product release, funding announcement, you name it, they have built a content machine that is unmatched. The next generation of companies will have content baked into their DNA.
7
793
Passion returning $2 billion on $18 million is absolutely crazy
Nubank rumoured to acquire Monzo for ~$13b. But who gets the 💰? My usual breakdown below 👇 Investors are likely to share a huge $9.3b of profits combined, on $1.9b invested. This represents a 5.8x blended, across 11 priced rounds. 🤑 The Founders & team will share about ~$2.0b. This is a super win for a company that had to take a down round mid-2020. My takeaways below: 1) Passion Capital's absolute home run 👑 @eileentso and Passion led each of Monzo's first three rounds. They also kept following-on in almost every round after that. The Seed alone will return nearly 200x! Across the three seed rounds they led, that's ~$1.6b of proceeds on ~$18m invested. Legendary. 2) Two huge absolute $ winners: Goodwater and Thrive 🏆 Goodwater led the Series C in Nov-17, at a $330m post. It will return over 20x the money. That round will generate the most absolute $ of all rounds at ~$2.0b. 📈 Thrive led the Jul-17 Series B round at $100m post money valuation, and is now looking at a cool~50x on its investment. Two amazing good calls within a few months of each other. 3) The crowd did great 🙌 Monzo raised three crowdfunding rounds, including the famous "£1m on Crowdcube in 96 seconds" in 2016. Those customers-turned-shareholders are sitting on ~35-80x of profits! Probably the second best-performing retail investment in UK tech history, after Revolut's own crowdcube campaign (where investors are now sitting on 1,000x+ paper gains). 4) Buying the dip paid off 📈 The Jun-20 down round (Novator, Nikesh Arora) came in at a ~$1.7b post money valuation. Interestingly, this is below the 2019 price. Back then, everyone thought Monzo might not make it. That round will returns ~5.9x and about $1.6b. 5) The latest growth rounds: good, not great 😐 The Series H (ADQ, Tencent, Coatue) and Series I (CapitalG, GV, Hedosophia) make ~2.5x each. For the Series H specifically, after almost five years: respectable, not spectacular. 6) Team & Founders 🧑‍🤝‍🧑🫂 Firstly: mega congrats to @tomblomfield, TS Anil and the whole team. This would be an incredibly outcome and it is definitely one to be celebrated. The team here will do very well, despite Monzo raising eleven rounds and diluting meaningfully. I estimate that Founders & ESOP will get about 15% of the outcome, or ~$2.0bn.
1
2
855
Is this the next AngelList? Indie Hackers?
Excited to introduce @Cosign: the curated professional network for the startup community: cosign.co Our goal is to create the following: - A comprehensive startup directory of investors, companies, and operators, including what they worked on and who they worked on it with. - Cosign graph: Who shaped your career? Who were you actually in the trenches with? Who would work with you again? Who thinks you’re someone to watch? - Durable reputation: Great endorsements happen every day on X and disappear into the feed. Cosign attaches those signals permanently to people and companies. - Discovery: Who are the best fintech angels? Which AI companies should I watch? Who are the best designers? - Intent network: Privately signal “I’d invest in them,” “I’d hire them,” “I’d work with them,” or eventually even “I’d acquire this company.” Match people when interest exists on both sides. Imagine if Wikipedia, LinkedIn, and OG AngelList had a baby. Though Cosign is a community, not a business. In order to join, you need to be cosigned. Or you can apply directly. David Booth and I started this idea 7 years ago but didn’t have the firepower to make it work. Now we do. No one has really touched LinkedIn in 20 years. Excited to take a swing. cosign.co
4
904
Adam Crookes SEO retweeted
SEO Roast for SaaS Website 🔥 - 6 action items in 60 seconds. - I always start with low-hanging fruit. - I've recorded SEO roasts since 2019. - My full private recordings are ~15 mins.
3
3
14
5,258
I've recorded SEO roast videos since 2019. Here's one I recently made for a SaaS founder. I always like to start with the low-hanging fruit. My full private recordings are ~15 mins.
1
2
11
1,283
Clip from SEO Roast for SaaS Website 🔥 I'd rather use direct quotes than paraphrase. I want links to verifiable sources that back up claims made in my blog articles.
1
117
Clip from SEO Roast for SaaS Website 🔥 When creating pricing tables for comparison articles, I always let readers know when the pricing information was last updated. This helps Google understand that the information is current and relevant.
153
Google testing new labelling experiment for search ads
Every day, we’re testing new ways to improve the Search ads experience — and many of you are quick to spot these experiments in the wild! I wanted to pull back the curtain and share a bit of context on one we’re starting this week. We’ll be running a small experiment with adding a "Strongest match" or "Strong match" label to certain Search ads. The goal is simple: to help people instantly identify the most relevant information for their query, and help advertisers connect more effectively with high-intent audiences. We work hard to ensure all the ads people see are relevant to what they’re looking for (that’s what makes them effective, after all) and this experiment uses existing ad quality and relevance signals to badge Search ads that are highly relevant. Right now, this is just an initial experiment rolling out to a small percentage of users in the US to help us assess its value. We’re always tweaking and testing things, so while I can't promise a preview for every new UI experiment, I thought it’d be fun to share the thinking behind this one before you start seeing it. Let me know what you think if you spot it out there!
1
6
809
“fibermaxxing” getting an est. 3,000 searches monthly
We’re breaking down — in detail — what people are searching for most right now, all based on U.S. @GoogleTrends data. Here’s what to know, courtesy of our new Summergeist trends report: 📈 “fibermaxxing” searches increased by +115% in the past 90 days, with searches for “dietary fiber” hitting an all-time high in 2026 🍷 “chilled red” recently hit an all-time Search high 👖“jorts,” “bermuda shorts” and “capri pants” are all back — with capri pants reaching an all-time high in 2026
2
2
682
I'm done with the "but my AI articles are actually really good" defense. If they were good, you'd put your name on them. You'd share these articles on LinkedIn and send them to prospects. You don't. Literally tells me everything I need to know. I read the first 3 sentences of every AI-generated article and bounce. Yep, so does everyone else. Last month, I audited a SaaS client publishing 8 AI articles a week. Average bounce rate: 91%. Time on page: 14 seconds. Demo bookings from organic blog traffic in Q1: zero. They were "ranking" for 400 keywords and converting NONE of them. I told them to cut output to 1 human-written article a week. I then gave clear instructions: 1. Stop writing for keywords. 2. Start writing for search intent. 3. Be opinionated. Have a POV! 4. Say something you shouldn't. 5. Interview experts + use quotes. 6. Take photos of written topic notes. 7. Include named authors! 8. Sprinkle in case studies. Whether they actually cut output and go all-in on human-written content is up to them. I left the ball in their court. But I know which chart I'd rather be staring at in 6 months. The one with less traffic and more pipeline.
2
5
586
This is what happens when you pump out low-value, AI-generated content. Google obviously has ZERO incentive to reward AI-generated blog articles. 10 articles saying the same thing make Google's search experience less useful.
One of the casualties of the Jan 20 unconfirmed algorithm update Google launched that hit a bunch of sites with spammy AI content This one is the subfolder of a major brand everyone has heard of & where the site was using AI to scale content -800K in monthly organic traffic YOY
1
3
560
How to fix SEO titles: 1. Read the top 10 titles 2. Spot the words everyone repeats 3. Pull in a hard-won opinion 4. Add proof you've lived this (not Googled it) 5. Show the reader a real person wrote it 6. Make a claim only an expert would risk 7. Publish, index, measure CTR
1
1
6
430
Yes, this website has lost traffic to AI Overviews. It's mostly just replaced the glossary pages. The "What is X" content. Those glossary pages give a short answer that Google used to send (a lot of) people to. Now AI serves up that short answer on Google. I think that part of their traffic will probably stay low. The rest of their site is much harder for AI to copy! Google still has every incentive to rank much of the site's "How-To" content, which is written from their personal experiences living and working in Germany. Some of it isn't and could be replaced by an AI. Those "how-to" guides need heavy rewrites by a human. The site's interactive tools (Berlin rent prices map, noise pollution map) are built on proprietary data and are still extremely difficult to replicate. I would spend less time on the glossary and accept that those page views may not come back. I would build more tools, because people come back to them, share them and link to them! The guides and the tools are the strongest part of their site.
AI is killing All About Berlin. When you Google something, you used to get a link to my website, but now you get an AI-generated answer trained on my work. This has a devastating impact on traffic.
2
442
Honest question: what's wrong with this? I want search to build these dashboards. Think about the opportunity here: who provides the data, APIs, and content feeding these mini-apps? Forward-thinking SEOs and brands.
For ongoing tasks, like planning a wedding or managing a move, Search can code entire custom experiences with Google @Antigravity. Think: mini apps, dashboards or trackers you can come back to again and again. #GoogleIO
1
1
5
2,063
I'm done with the "but my AI articles are actually really good" defense. If they were good, you'd put your name on them. You'd share these articles on LinkedIn and send them to prospects. You don't. That tells me everything I need to know. I read the first 3 sentences of every AI-generated article and bounce. So does everyone else. Last month, I audited a SaaS client publishing 8 AI articles a week. Average bounce rate: 91%. Time on page: 14 seconds. Demo bookings from organic blog traffic in Q1: zero. They were "ranking" for 400 keywords and converting none of them. I told them to cut output to 1 human-written article a week. I then gave clear instructions: 1. Stop writing for keywords. 2. Start writing for search intent. 3. Be opinionated. Have a POV! 4. Say something you shouldn't. 5. Interview experts + use quotes. 6. Take photos of written topic notes. 7. Include named authors! 8. Sprinkle in case studies. Whether they actually cut output and go all-in on human-written content is up to them. But I know which chart I'd rather be staring at in 6 months. The one with less traffic and more pipeline.
2
7
667
Get A 15-Minute Video Roast Of Your Website SEO I'll send you a private, 15-minute video in 48 hours. Actionable advice specifically for your website content. Submit your website 👉 adam-crookes.com
196