Just made pasta and got pure Habernaro peppers in my eyes... Yikes that was painful!
Wash your hands after you cut up peppers!
1
5
270
Not mine but I know the seller is legit. Look at the discription comment 🚗nagora.shop/listing/82e67d8c…
7
383
I, too, have decided to pretend to stop enriching uranium in exchange for $300 billion.
Please pay in nano.
Thanks.
nano_13d65anhkipaip7rw4kd4m9i79wudabfhs3qj3ixf1h5j4r4u4xs7hbrwgp7
1
1
150
Nano has a durable competitive advantage.
Vote with your wallet, spend and demand nano for payments.
8
171
Nano is highly decentralised, with more than a hundred nodes around the world, totally independent and all focused on one thing - facilitating p2p cash with no middle men taking a cut (or printing new coins😉).
unavailable
6
154
A lot of people lost their nano on Bitgrail, and were unsuccessful claiming compensation. If they could get something back that would be the best possible outcome.
BG Services S.r.l., through its liquidator Francesco Firano, announces that a feasibility study is underway to allow eligible users to withdraw remaining cryptocurrencies, including 4.2M $XNO, subject to legal review and the company’s liquidation status.
1
7
711
Another project claiming to have Zero inflation....
It's a false claim, it still has emissions.
Nano is still the only coin that does not rely on any emissions to function.
NEAR halted all token emissions on february 23. zero inflation. fee switch now generates $34m annualized revenue, 96% from intents doing $2.1b monthly volume. fully unlocked supply, no remaining VC or team vesting. market cap sitting at $1.78b down 76% from highs. both bitwise and grayscale filed for spot NEAR ETFs. the protocol went from bleeding tokens to breakeven-to-deflationary in under 6 months and the market is still pricing it like a dead L1. daily fees went from $1 to $80,000 in a year. 78% of intents volume is stablecoins. that's not speculative flow, that's real economic activity across 35 chains. deploying more capital
1
12
266
Many enthusiasts don't understand the difference between coping general data, and copying money. Communicating a text message works fine with layers, money is different, every time you use a substitute layer instead of the real thing you add attack surface, and other added costs.
Replying to @alexjohnward
I love how you’re saying this by using a protocol that’s built on layers, some of which were made in the 1960s
Your networking protocol knowledge seems like it’s dog shit. I’m gonna have to mute you now because you’ve proven to be a non-value add
119









