weird || shit posting || Rohit Charan || SRT Chiru || occassional trolling || Music 🎶 || offensive - all in the given order
Joined September 2019
- Tweets232K
- Following2K
- Followers6.8K
- Likes425K
Rest in peace Sir Stewart
In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to:
Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Fund
alzresearch.org/giving/
Alzheimer’s Foundation of America Caregiver Resources
alzfdn.org/donate/
Photo Credit: Tommy Garcia
the dudeness retweeted
In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to:
Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Fund
alzresearch.org/giving/
Alzheimer’s Foundation of America Caregiver Resources
alzfdn.org/donate/
Photo Credit: Tommy Garcia
the dudeness retweeted
Backbenchers laughing at someone who scored 96 out of 100 while they themselves scored zero.
the dudeness retweeted
Bored, Let’s try this
You can just say "Dhruv Rathee is a Fraud'' and get 3k likes immediately.
the dudeness retweeted
To gain attention,.... Ok
M. K. Gand
Indira Gand
Sonia Gand
Rahul Gand
Priyanka Gand
Rehan Gand
Miraya Gand
&
Supriya Urinate
BJP buffoons fall prey so easily
In communication, deliberate misspelling is a strategy to gain attention.
It’s called Typo Marketing.
Thank you for amplifying @RahulGandhi ji’s tweet on Tata by desperately pointing out Sitaraman misspelt.
Hahhahaha!
the dudeness retweeted
Good strategy Supriya ji.
Your boss is trending 👍
BJP buffoons fall prey so easily
In communication, deliberate misspelling is a strategy to gain attention.
It’s called Typo Marketing.
Thank you for amplifying @RahulGandhi ji’s tweet on Tata by desperately pointing out Sitaraman misspelt.
Hahhahaha!
the dudeness retweeted
Dear Mr. Gand,
We totally understand you.
Dear Mrs. Sitarama,
1.Which "legal and commercial matter" required Tata Trusts and Tata Sons to be hosted at Amit Shah's residence?
2.When is crony number 1 going to appear in the game and which pieces of Tata is he going to get?
Finally, all India's businesses except 3-4 of your cronies, already hate all of you and don't need any incitement.
the dudeness retweeted
It's not a coincidence, Namit Malhotra deliberatly cast every single anti-hindu in his movie just to humiliate hindus.
I'm not gonna watch this movie even for free.
the dudeness retweeted
Bound scripts in bollywood be like :
#JanhviKapoor On #PEDDI Controversy:
‘IN THE SOUTH, THERE’S VERY RARELY A BOUND SCRIPT... AND VERY RARELY IN THOSE SCRIPTS YOU SEE WHERE THE CAMERA ANGLES ARE...
BUT HAVING SAID THAT... I ALSO NEED TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR MY HALF OF IT’
“The reason I was so apprehensive to talk about it was that many people worked hard on that film, and I really didn’t know what to say or if there was anything really to even say because it’s important that I take ownership from my half of…whatever that fiasco was because it weighs heavily on my conscience the sort of negative impact and a narrative like that can have on our society, specific to my gender. I think that shame I will always carry with me. Could have I done more? Could have I been more vigilant? Could have I made a bigger scene? A hundred percent, yes. Was it problematic? Was it extreme objectification? Did it even propagate sexual assault narratively? Yes.
The only thing that I can do is to ensure that it doesn’t happen again. I went through the beats of really beating myself up of ‘I should have been more vigilant. I should have made a bigger scene.’ Again, I don’t like saying this because it sounds like I am shifting blame but you know how it’s like, ‘Yes, whatever the director says, you have to be professional, you have to listen to the director.’ So, I was really navigating how to make things less problematic as best I thought, as and when information was becoming available to me, because in the South, there’s very rarely a bound script, and very rarely in those scripts you see, where the camera angles are but having said that I also need to take responsibility for my half of it. I do come from a place of privilege, I should have taken advantage of that because I am going to get the sh*t for being privilege anyway. So, I might as well may have leveraged it.
I really get so conscious when I speak about this because I don’t want to sound like that I am trying to be the victim here. It was a violating experience in a way. The good thing that came out of all this, is that maybe tomorrow someone else will think twice before they present a lead actress this way.”
© Koffee with Karan - Jio Hotstar
the dudeness retweeted
ఇండియన్ సినిమా హిస్టరీ లో ఆన్ స్క్రీన్ మెగాస్టార్ ట్యాగ్ ఫస్ట్ టైమ్ యూజ్ చేసిన హీరో బాస్ @KChiruTweets గారు కి మాత్రమే 🔥🔥🔥
(ఆ తర్వాతే మలయాళంలో మమ్ముట్టి సార్ కంటిన్యూ చేసారు)
ఆ.పూ.. కి తెలీని నీలాంటి ఎర్రిపూ.. నోరు ఉంది కదా అని నోటికి వచ్చిన సొళ్ళు వాగేసుకొచ్చు రా కొ.. 🗣️🗣️🗣️
T360, Venkyreviews, Akashavani
Not just these. There are tons more instances where these bottom feeders’ judgments utterly failed. This guy and Barbell are both extremely poor at understanding films.
On top of that, he has a documented public history of allegedly posting reviews without even watching the films.
Always negative Barbell thrives on negativity, which does more harm than good to the film industry.
Ironically, some audiences psychologically assume that low ratings automatically mean genuine reviews. 😂
❌ No reviewer can make or break or influence a film (including us).
What actually matters?
Though termed as reviews are individual opinions, Whose early judgments consistently match the eventual market verdict most of the time, and how well they identify what works and doesn’t work in an average film. That’s what makes a credible reviewer.
These always-nitpicking, low-rating guys largely cater to people who don’t even watch films in theaters. That audience finds their negativity relatable.
Even for films like Ranabaali, dealing with the 1878 famine and British atrocities, these guys expect entertainment and a fast-paced narrative. What a WTH moment! 😂
And about their reach…
Some audiences mistake reach for authenticity.
X’s & YT recommendation algorithm is open-source, not guesswork. It amplify individuals not websites on their platforms.. but reach has nothing to do with the quality of their judgment.
Consistently giving low ratings to attract eyeballs can be another engagement tactic. Nothing inherently wrong with that, as long as audiences can see through it.
Negativity isn’t honesty. Its proof of poor judgment.
the dudeness retweeted
"I wish people worshipped nature"
agni, vayu, arka, varuna, indra?
