How Trump Is Reacting to the Midterm Results
By @maggieNYT
nytimes.com/video/us/politic… via @NYTimes
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
Front page headlines this morning in The @nytimes and The @washingtonpost
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
Now that @AbdulElSayed has been elected to the U.S. Senate, let's flash back to 2007, when Bill Clinton praised Abdul El-Sayed for his University of Michigan speech.
"I don't want to embarrass your senior speaker. But I wish every person in the world who believes that we are fated to have a clash of civilizations and cannot reach across the religious divides could've heard you speak today. I just wish every person in the world could've heard you speak today."
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
1997 hat Bob Dylan noch den Cowboy-Hut abgenommen, als er Papst Johannes Paul II. begegnete - gestern bei Leo XIV. blieb die Kapuze auf. Anmerkungen zur Audienz via @BR24 br.de/nachrichten/kultur/his…
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
‼️
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
I know a lot of folks are talking about the election results, but this tweet, from a sitting @VP, is stunning. The decision to go to war is the most solemn responsibility that a President and Vice President have as leaders.
So for you to reduce it to a simple political calculation while we still have 50,000 troops in the Middle East, is one of the most crass, cynical things I've seen. You and President Trump got us into this war, without a clear objective and without regard for the will of the American people. It's cost us American lives and billions of dollars of American treasure, with no end in sight.
Last night, the American people delivered a crystal-clear message about the mismanagement of this war, and what it has done to our pocketbooks. Whether you supported the war or simply failed to stop it, your job is not to try and cover yourself, but to get us out of it.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
DONALD TRUMP’S REPUDIATION, AMERICA’S REVENGE
»Even J. D. Vance admits that the righteous blue wave in the midterms wasn’t a result of Republicans failing to show up—it’s that they showed up for the Democrats.«
By Susan B. Glasser @sbg1
newyorker.com/news/letter-fr…
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
„Man muss nur so unbeschadet wie möglich das Leben überstehen. Und das größte Glück: mit sinnenhafter Freude ohne Furcht vor irgendetwas durchkommen.“ Janosch
Alfons Schweiggert war sein Freund. Mit dieser Erinnerung erweist er ihm die letzte Ehre:
dralexandrahildebrandt.blogs…
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
Replying to @jana_hensel
Das Spektrum der US-Demokraten reicht von Linkspartei bis CDU. Oder mit anderen Worten: James Talarico würde eher nicht mit Elif Eralp koalieren.
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
Jon Ossoff’s decisive victory in Georgia propels him into the top ranks of the Democratic Party and any discussions of the 2028 presidential contest—but to become a major national figure, he’ll have to define himself more clearly, @GrahamDavidA argues. theatln.tc/lkxTiXq0
🎨: The Atlantic. Source: Elijah Nouvelage / Bloomberg / Getty.
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
Ich fände es übrigens wirklich klug, und auch angenehm, wenn alle hier endlich aufhören würden, diese needy Unsinns-Posts von Pöbelbürgern zu reposten.
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
Replying to @Nate_Cohn
nytimes.com/interactive/2026…
Gift article
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
Jon Ossoff sounding more and more like a Democrat nominee in waiting…
Anna *Wo führt das hin?* retweeted
Breaking news: Democrat Abdul El-Sayed has been elected to the Senate in Michigan, defeating Republican Mike Rogers, according to the Associated Press ft.trib.al/8iwvk2Q
»The Republican Party has only the President and his policies to blame for its historic losses in the 2026 midterms.«
A Blue Wave Just Crashed on Trump newyorker.com/news/the-polit…

























