Pinned Tweet
Replying to @apellis @michael_nielsen
I also have a hypothesis about the relationship between aphantasia and working in higher dimensions:
In HS, I initially found planar and 3D geometry challenging because I couldn't picture anything. Then I quickly figured out how to get the right answers without visualization
I've seen several people (some I follow and regard highly) say they'd like "AI slop" labeled for convenience; or they feel they must be "on the lookout" for it.
this puzzles me. if AI content is so bad, then surely labeling isn't necessary. and some presumably find value in it.
It feels like every time I open ChatGPT, whether on desktop or mobile, some mischievous elf has changed the UI and capriciously added and removed features at random.
Alex Ellis retweeted
A Patrick Stewart anecdote I’ve always loved: Gene Roddenberry, the creator of Star Trek, was once asked about the decision to cast Patrick Stewart as Captain Jean-Luc Picard.
The reporter said, “Surely by the 24th century, they would have found a cure for male pattern baldness.” To which Gene Roddenberry replied, “No, by the 24th century, no one will care.”
If P = NP but all the things we thought were not P just have huge constants, then the only reasonable conclusion is that we are in a simulation and these constants were chosen to be inaccessible to denizens of the simulation
I love when a film or TV show deploys a piece of music SO WELL that, for me, it becomes the canonical setting and meaning-cluster for that piece of music. this phenomenon deserves its own term. maybe a long German word.
I don't think it was intentional, but this had what looked like a sly half reference to one of my favorite niche roadside attractions












