ashvinn (@ashvinn) header
ashvinn (@ashvinn) profile picture

Shipped 100+ products From Microsoft & Dell to startups Product | UX | Workflows | Layouts | Usability | Arch | GTM | CI/CD (harness) | Full-Stack | Cloud

Seattle, WA & Charleston, SC
Joined April 2008
Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)Photo by ashvinn (@ashvinn)
SDLC for the AI-Native world
4
1
2
258
What’s up with Googl ? Of course search queries will drop with AI, how do you monetize the generated content better? I use it for recommendations and that should be monetized on your end.
18
A problem in the perspectives.
WAIT… I can’t believe Sam Altman really said this out loud about local AI: “A lot of people want local inference. And they assume that the problem is solved now because we are going to have open source models. And so we're not going to need all the stuff in the data center. But from a global allocation perspective, actually, it's quite terrible to have everybody have a bunch of the world's limited supply of DRAM sitting in their own computer. And, being used 5% of the time.” this is such a bizarre thing to say in the open. I don’t get why people buying hardware for their own use is framed as a competition with data centers spending billions to buy hardware at scale. if anyone should be complaining about how the world’s memory is allocated, it must be the average consumers facing the skyrocketing hardware prices. it just doesn’t make any sense.
18
💡 @karpathy calls AI knowledge setup "a hacky collection of scripts." 🛠️ If it's that hard for him, where does that leave the rest of us? 🤷 What can we do about our knowledge? 💼 👇🧵 nitter.cf/karpathy/status/203980…
LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
2
16
I needed a LLM to help me vote… one missing voters pamphlet cryptic language and so many unopposed candidates? Really? Washington state Director of elections is also unopposed. So the voters don’t really have a choice.. No wonder the participation is low.
10
🎓 Berkeley math professor: students get the answers from AI 🤖, he can't tell who did the work. 🤷 No grades for homework. 📝 As a parent, would you support that? 👨‍👩‍👧 👇🧵
3
1
47
yep more professors think Grades dont do justice to the students
2
🧠 ChatGPT is keeping your memories. 🤖 In one study, 96% were saved without the user asking. 😳 What do you think about outsourcing your memories? 🤔 👇🧵
2
16
Just had conversation today. Most folks in the frontier labs want to keep advancing their model memory. Rely on the model, build your handicap. Dont you want an alternative?
3
Is it progress or a new mode of operation: I can remember commit ids on my GitHub for conversations with Agents and AI tools. Saves me a lot of time and effort. #geekout
20
Not all tokens are the same in value…
Dario Amodei: some tokens Claude produces are worth a few cents, others could be worth tens of millions of dollars. His examples: 1. Telling someone to restart their Mac: the model has said it 10 million times, worth a dollar or less 2. Telling a pharma company to move an aromatic ring to the other end of a molecule: potentially tens of millions 3. Expect pay-for-results pricing, or labor-like pricing by the hour 4. It's a new industry, so many models will be tried Today pricing is simpler: per the S-1, usage-based pricing was 80% of H1 2026 revenue and subscriptions 20%. Full breakdown here: theaiopportunities.com/p/ant…
1
34