alex (@astahmer_dev) header
alex (@astahmer_dev) profile picture

@panda__css & OSS, frenchy freelancer https://nitter.cf/t.co/QSSMKiB9tG

Montpellier
Joined November 2020
Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)Photo by alex (@astahmer_dev)
Finally ! Months of work with the team to make this and I'm really proud of what we achieved 🙏 I hope you'll all enjoy using it as much as we do 🐼
🚀 Introducing Panda CSS The modern CSS-in-JS styling engine! Say goodbye to runtime CSS-in-JS 🎨💪✨ 🔸Works with Server Components 🔸Recipes, Variants, and Patterns 🔸Design Tokens Support Works in Next.js, Vue, Qwik, Solid, Astro, and more. panda-css.com
6
8
1
73
28,745
alex retweeted
Software is having its Industrial Revolution and it’s changing what matters in software frameworks. Today’s frameworks were designed for the crafty carpenter, tomorrow’s are designed for mass manufacturing processes where rigor > conciseness. Take foldkit vs react/solid, for example. You can argue that foldkit is more verbose or complicated for some use cases compared to the traditional alternatives, but everything doable in react/solid is also doable in foldkit. Everything doable in foldkit is not (or at least not easily or consistently) doable in react/solid because they lack the rigor of command+event state machines with story & scene testing. Getting that back isn’t easy and is a substantial loss for agentic coding. Before AI, there was the valid argument of picking what humans like best. Humans kinda suck at programming because we are constrained by our skills, taste and (lack of) discipline, so frameworks that worked in this era catered to the lowest common denominator of mass market human developers. While I agree that react/solid are powerful in the hands of humans, that simply doesn’t matter anymore. What’s best for humans does not necessarily translate to what’s best for agents. Some tasks may indeed be “a bit harder” with foldkit in human terms, but AI is capable of solving all of them in a few minutes, so who cares. Instead of bike-shedding philosophy and taste, just choose the more rigorous (and scalable) option. It costs you nothing and gains you everything. Effect is another example of this. With AI, now everyone of all skill levels can use advanced programming techniques that are objectively safer and more scalable, but were out of reach for many human programmers. Or didn’t appeal to the stubborn tastes of a particular person. With humans now out of the way of technology adoption - I think it’s obvious that the following techniques are going to become way more commonplace: 1. State Machines 2. Functional programming 3. Declarative infrastructure 4. Test Driven Development 5. Domain Driven Design 6. Actor Systems 7. Rigorous API schemas 8. Type Safety and Formal Verification 9. Disciplined Operations (monitoring, on-call) Alchemy is designed to bring these techniques together into a seamless experience for building and deploying applications of massive scale. It is the “rails” and “parts” of the ai software assembly line.
28
43
16
684
51,103
been doing this for a few months now and can confirm it works reliably! tho for me it started as a way to see if each harness correctly picked the AGENTS.md / skills
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
1
107
17,789
208 tokens/s + 99% cache rate on dsh with opus 5.5 medium!
2
2
260
this is nice; not sure why other harness dont have it (at least for their stuff)
153
Content mappers in TS 7.1 are an absolute game changer It’s plugins for TypeScript: a way to dynamically compute a static type signature for external file types (.vue, .md, etc) and integrate them directly into tsc compilation
TypeScript 7.1 Beta is now available! Now with a preview API, content mapper support, new features, and some great optimizations. Give it a try and give us some feedback! devblogs.microsoft.com/types…
20
69
9
1,087
46,484
Introducing tsrs: a Rust port of the TypeScript compiler 🦀 We are not forking TypeScript! ◆ In close collaborating with the TypeScript team ◆ Up to 8x faster than TS 7.0 & ~70% less memory ◆ Runs in WASM, so it works in your browser & on Workers ◆ Soon part of the Oxc toolchain npx tsrs blog.cloudflare.com/typescri…
146
542
223
5,083
662,742
experimenting with a tabbed sidebar on deepseek harness, i quickly went to spend most of my time in the "Done" tab and mostly ignore the working stuff now I guess @theo was right
2
11
1,211
you can do so much more with dsh plugins
After every T3 Code Nightly update, I run my t3code-customize ritual. The composer shows my 5h and weekly usage, context and tok/s.
1
2
381
that looks pretty good! & that also reminds me that i should really release/communicate more of my stuff
Introducing Tamagui 3. Now the fastest and highest coverage Tailwind style library there is, free or paid. Tamagui is now 100% open source, I’ve made Takeout and Bento OSS as well. A rewritten compiler in rust now makes native even faster, plus a new C++ native runtime avoids re-rendering. Flat style props, React Strict DOM, and a web-alignment push make Tamagui easier, lighter, and more familiar than ever. tamagui.dev/blog/version-thr…
1
1
13
1,170
t3code, with orchestrator v2 finally merged, is like if codex had opencodex built-in which is awesome & should be your main harness if you want a batteries-included one with 0 effort but if you want to customize it and make it your own then bb is an excellent alternative
1
5
488
dsh seems promising but it still looks early and the bb DX is soooo much better for now; tho that can be fixed so i guess t3code wins short/mid-term but if it doesnt get a plugin system in the future then i'd bet on bb/dsh/opencode v2 (havent tried that one yet!) long-term
2
164
people should really stop using TUIs as harnesses; it makes no sense the DX is horrible you can't even see what you paste; trying to read content in there is a nightmare.. why are you inflicting that yourself that said pi extensibility is really awesome
3
12
781
Effect v4 is here. One ecosystem. Zero dependencies. The next chapter of Effect and the foundation for building reliable software and AI agents in TypeScript.
81
321
125
2,313
383,733
tldr on deepswe it looks like gpt 6.1 sol low/medium = same (if not better with medium) pricing/efficiency as luna max?
2
6
422
have tried it for a bunch of hours; it's definitely not as cheap as i thought gpt 6.1 sol low eats the 20$ sub like 10% of the 5h session every 5min, luna max usually reaches that in ~30mins-1h it's much faster than luna max tho, i guess slow mode exists and is called luna max
1
142
nobody talking about the effect+alchemy+cloudflare combo to literally build f'n anything why not?
36
20
5
487
69,626
and thats exactly what we need! faster/cheaper stuff; not smarter
🚨 BREAKING: GPT-6 Sol confirmed WORSE than 5.6 Sol on DeepSWE, computer use and research debugging, and no better at cyber it's cheaper and more efficient, but not a smarter model
2
15
786
alex retweeted
I am on the search for work trials! I have compiled some projects covering tools, libraries, graphics, Rust and JavaScript. If you have opportunities or leads, please get in contact! kaleidawave-public-pages.val…
4
4
15
1,927
I think it's great that the tw ecosystem can finally benefit from something like this! that being said that looks like TS with extra steps
2
8
1,358
i may be addicted to cheap models
3
11
3,233