Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands) profile picture
Colorado, USA
Joined April 2014
Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)Photo by Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 (@atethousands)
People seem confused about why Tesla is getting so much backlash over its new "flying Roadster." For those of us who were once genuinely enthusiastic about Tesla, this isn't about hating innovation. It's about a long history of broken promises, misleading expectations, and increasingly absurd marketing. Tesla unveiled the second-generation Roadster in 2017, took customer deposits, and promised deliveries in 2020. Six years past that deadline, it still hasn't delivered the car. Instead, it's demonstrating an even more outrageous version with features that will likely never make it into production. The original 2nd gen Roadster would still be an amazing car today. Why not just deliver what was promised? Then there's Full Self-Driving. Tesla marketed the idea that Model 3 owners could turn their cars into income-generating robotaxis. That never materialized. Even if the technology eventually gets there, the opportunity has already passed for many early buyers. Timing matters. Delivering something a decade late isn't fulfilling the promise you sold to customers. And then there's Solar Roof. Unveiled in 2016 as a revolutionary approach to residential solar, it struggled with costs, installation challenges, and adoption far below expectations. After nearly a decade, Tesla discontinued it entirely in August 2026. Another grand vision abandoned, leaving existing customers with a discontinued product to maintain. Then came the Cybertruck, marketed as a nearly indestructible, revolutionary truck. Instead, we got a vehicle with questionable build quality, numerous recalls, expensive repairs, disappointing results in several real-world off-road tests, and specifications that fell short of the original promises. It literally looks like a dumpster, but aesthetics aside, the collapsing demand speaks volumes about the reality of what Tesla delivered. Another heavily hyped product that fell dramatically short of expectations. This is how consumer trust erodes. Not through one disappointment, but through years of accumulating them. And this is part of the reason why many people who were once enthusiastic about Tesla have become critical and cynical about it. But there's something even more fundamental here: Tesla has completely departed from the grounded, practical vision that made so many of us enthusiastic about the company in the first place. Electric cars were ambitious, but the idea was grounded in reality. People could charge at home, infrastructure could gradually expand, technology could improve, and millions of ordinary people could eventually benefit. There was a realistic path toward mass adoption. What the hell does a flying Roadster powered by compressed-air thrusters have to do with any of that? It's an expensive, impractical engineering stunt with enormous packaging, safety, and regulatory challenges, and no credible near-term path toward mass-market usefulness. Modern electric cars already achieve ridiculous acceleration without this nonsense. What practical problem does it solve? Who actually needs it? When will ordinary consumers benefit? And watching Tesla fans compare this experimental prototype in a Roadster-shaped shell to actual production vehicles people can buy today is ridiculous. What's especially infuriating is the cult-like mentality surrounding all of this. You can't point out the history of failed promises, question the practicality, or demand realistic timelines without being accused of being a "hater" or having "Elon derangement syndrome." Tesla deserves recognition for helping make electric cars a reality, but that success doesn't give it a blank check to keep marketing increasingly fantastical promises while failing to deliver on previous commitments. This isn't hatred. It's disappointment from people who once believed in the company, watched it accomplish extraordinary things, and have since watched it increasingly substitute practical innovation with spectacle and promises. Elon fanboys are also ignoring a bigger pattern that goes beyond Tesla. What made many of us enthusiastic about Elon and Tesla and in the first place was a grounded vision of technological progress that could genuinely improve millions of lives. Electric cars were ambitious, but practical, achievable, and useful to ordinary people. Now we're supposed to get excited about flying cars with compressed-air thrusters that have no credible path to mass adoption and solve no meaningful problem for the average consumer. It's the same kind of thinking behind marketing the colonization of Mars as some urgent necessity for humanity's survival. There's nothing wrong with space exploration, but Earth isn't about to become uninhabitable because of the Sun. We're talking about geological timescales, while humanity faces enormous problems RIGHT NOW: poverty, hunger, access to education, corruption, abuse of power, wars, and a lack of government accountability. We have plenty of very real problems to solve before worrying about humanity's survival on another planet. And then there's DOGE. I was genuinely excited about the original idea of making government more efficient, reducing waste, and increasing accountability. Instead, we got questionable savings figures, inexperienced people making sweeping decisions, serious concerns over access to sensitive personal information, and an initiative that ultimately fizzled out without delivering its grand promises. Another enormous narrative that fell apart when confronted with reality. That's what makes all of this so frustrating. It's not that we stopped believing in technological progress. It's that we've watched someone who once pursued grounded, transformative ideas increasingly embrace fantastical promises, political spectacle, and questionable narratives disconnected from practical reality. And somehow, pointing out this history of disappointment gets you labeled a "hater" or accused of having "Elon derangement syndrome." The problem isn't dreaming big. It's repeatedly selling people those dreams, failing to deliver, and then expecting everyone to applaud the next, even more ridiculous promise without asking what happened to the last one. The world doesn't need more spectacular promises. It needs practical solutions to real problems, honest expectations, and accountability for what was promised. That's what made Tesla exciting in the first place, and that's what so many of us feel has been betrayed.
279
789
172
4,279
300,540
Trump is going to announce the Canadian national anthem can’t be played in the US isn’t he?
4
63
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
10,573
16,327
11,363
87,601
77,054,019
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
20,434
166,865
39,459
799,711
175,539,510
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
A popular Flat Earth debunker, MC Toon, compiled a list he calls Toon’s Laws of Flerf - observations about Flat Earthers that have an irritating habit of proving themselves accurate over and over again. Watching that happen inspired me to compile a similar set for another community that seems to operate by many of the same rules. So, I present: ALEX’S LAWS OF ANTI-VAX 1. Anti-vaxxer citations contradict the anti-vaxxer’s claim once you actually read them. No exceptions. A headline, screenshot, abstract, or cherry-picked sentence gets posted as proof. Then you open the study and discover that the paper either doesn’t support the claim, directly contradicts it, or contains limitations that completely change what the anti-vaxxer said it showed. 2. Anti-vaxxer predictions never fail. When they don’t happen, the deadline simply moves. No exceptions. Everyone vaccinated was going to die in six months. Then a year. Then two years. Then five. When the predicted catastrophe fails to arrive, the prediction is rarely acknowledged as wrong. A new date, new mechanism, or new disaster simply replaces it. 3. Anti-vaxxers are hyper-skeptics when evaluating vaccine evidence and hyper-gullible when evaluating anti-vaccine evidence. No exceptions. A large controlled study involving hundreds of thousands of people will be dissected for every conceivable limitation. But a doctor on a podcast, an anonymous screenshot, a VAERS entry, a Substack article, or somebody saying “my cousin got sick after the shot” can be accepted almost instantly. 4. One dissenting MD is a brave truth-teller. Ten thousand agreeing PhDs are bought and paid for. No exceptions. Agreement among thousands of researchers across universities, countries, specialties, governments, and independent institutions is dismissed as corruption. Find one credentialed person who agrees with the conspiracy, however, and suddenly credentials become extremely important. 5. No amount of evidence is enough to establish vaccine safety, but any anecdote, screenshot, VAERS report, Substack, or meme is enough to declare vaccines dangerous. No exceptions. Millions of doses, randomized trials, surveillance systems, epidemiological studies, and years of follow-up can always be dismissed as insufficient, compromised, or part of the conspiracy. But one story that begins with “I know someone who…” can apparently settle the question. Alex’s Laws of Anti-Vax I suspect I’ll be collecting supporting examples for quite some time.
16
47
5
222
3,212
My conspiracy theory: Larkin and Hughes hatched a plan at the Olympics. Larkin demands a trade, helps force Yzerman out, then tells Detroit’s new GM: want me to stay? Go get Quinn. New GM has cap space, no attachment to Stevie’s prospects, and every incentive to swing big.
3
301
But Trump told us someone cut a 350 yard gash in the liner
The Justice Department is admitting that a $14 million renovation on the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC, was flawed, and is dropping the criminal case against a former Olympian that accused him of damaging the pool, according to a new court filing. cnn.it/4hHsa15
2
128
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
The Justice Department is admitting that a $14 million renovation on the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC, was flawed, and is dropping the criminal case against a former Olympian that accused him of damaging the pool, according to a new court filing. cnn.it/4hHsa15
1,918
5,812
1,324
26,170
2,499,132
Very cool!
This is pure cosmic poetry in motion 🌌 The Hirajoshi Wave — a polyrhythmic pendulum where each sphere swings at the exact frequency of the notes in the C Hirajoshi pentatonic scale (C, D, Eb, G, Ab). Watch the chaos of the rainbow trails… then the perfect realignment. Music is math you can see and feel. Ancient Japanese scale meets pure physics. The universe doesn’t just make music — it is music.
2
67
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Canada’s boreal forest — the source of much of the wildfire smoke drifting into the U.S. — isn’t like our managed forests in the lower 48. It’s the largest intact forest ecosystem on Earth: roughly 1.3 billion acres (about 78 times larger than Alaska’s Tongass, our biggest national forest, and 7 times larger than all 154 U.S. National Forests combined). It stretches in an almost continuous belt from the Yukon to Newfoundland. Why can’t they just do controlled burns like we do here? Because most of it is remote, roadless wilderness. • Less than 9% of Canada’s population lives in the boreal region. • Less than 1% of the forest itself is developed. • Vast areas have no roads and are only accessible by aircraft or winter roads. You can’t send crews in to do prescribed burns across a billion+ acres of inaccessible terrain the way we can in populated areas near roads and communities in the U.S. Wildfire has been nature’s primary management tool in these ecosystems for thousands of years. Smoke reaching the Northeast isn’t new either. It happened in 1950, 1988, 1995, 2002, 2017, 2021, 2023, 2025, and now 2026. Weather (especially upper-level wind patterns) determines where the smoke goes, not just where the fires are burning. Blaming Canada’s government for “not controlling” these fires is political theater. The scale and inaccessibility make large-scale suppression or prevention across that wilderness fundamentally different — and in many places, practically impossible — from managing forests near U.S. population centers. Nature runs that forest. Politicians don’t. Let’s stop pretending otherwise.
376
1,624
135
5,760
271,288
Another chemmie couldn’t handle a comparison and resorts to blocking. Why are they so scared of a simple discussion?
1
6
70
Another sad chemmie that can’t handle a discussion. They have no answer or proof and so resort to name calling and blocking. Same story different chemmie
3
48
Another fragile chemmie that can’t handle questions and resorts to insults and blocking.
2
28
This platform is the biggest threat to humanity that we have ever faced If MSM was a threat to the people, then X is a million times worse. The more extreme the view, the more clicks it gets. The further people entrench themselves in Us vs. Them narrative.
1
38
Same story different chemmy. They make wild claims then can’t show a shred of evidence or engage in any sort of discourse. They resort to name calling and blocking.
3
11
208
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @chatswithem
The entire chemtrail theory can be summarized as: ‘I saw something in the sky and then guessed the rest.’ 🤦🏻🦄
1
13
123
Rudolf the Red 🇺🇸 retweeted
The new conspiracy is that tick-borne illnesses are actually "planted" by "them" in nature. That's dumb. We've found Rickettsia and Borrelia-like bacteria in fossilized ticks from 100 million years ago. Don't be an idiot... science.oregonstate.edu/IMPA…
19
38
2
137
2,691
I’m onboard Let’s vote on issues, not personalities. The people in charge shouldn’t be celebrities soaking up media attention. Let voters decide the destination, let elected officials handle the implementation Less party worship. More accountability. More issue-based democracy.
Fuck the Republican party. And fuck the Democrat party. Burn the whole motherfucker to the ground.
1
51