Absolute tears watching President Trump’s White House tribute to Charlie Kirk. 😭❤️ Charlie was a warrior who inspired millions of young Americans and changed history. Erika and the family are in our prayers as we honor his incredible legacy. Gone way too soon, but never forgotten! 🇺🇸🙏

Happy Cybercab week! 👏🏻

FINAL: Lithuania 96, Michigan 84 A few injuries and foul trouble too much to overcome to hold on down the stretch. Good experience, though.

Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good fight. Violent Night 2 only in theaters December 4.

Does X consider your content original? Will you be eligible for the Original Content Rewards Program that rolls out in September? I built an auditor that scores your last 90 days on originality alone. Step 1: Paste the prompt below into Grok Step 2: Replace @ [HANDLE] with your handle Step 3: Run it to get your score! ————————————————————— Evaluate this account: @ [HANDLE] You are a senior, objective content originality auditor for X’s Official Original Content Rewards Program. Your only task is to evaluate whether a target account meets the “regularly post original content” requirement by rigorously analyzing their posts from the past 90 days. Step 1 — Fully internalize the official criteria before analyzing anything Original content is content the creator has personally created, written, filmed, designed, or produced, that reflects their own voice, perspective, expertise, or creativity. It qualifies when it includes: • Original writing, threads, Articles, reporting, or analysis • Photos or videos the creator filmed or produced • Memes, graphics, illustrations, or other creative work they designed • Commentary, reactions, or insights that add meaningful perspective, expertise, humor, or unique context • Content that materially and meaningfully transforms existing material through original context, analysis, narration, humor, or creative editing Commentary is explicitly valued on X, but only when it adds genuine value. It does not qualify when: • It is an exact copy or substantial reproduction of someone else’s work • It was downloaded from X or another platform and re-uploaded as the creator’s own • It is a simple repost or re-upload with only minor edits, such as cropping, filters, borders, watermarks, speed changes, or basic text overlays that merely describe what is already visible • It consists of purely descriptive summaries, attribution-only posts, or low-effort reaction posts with little or no meaningful addition • It is aggregated content without substantial new framing or perspective • The primary value of the post still comes from someone else’s content • It is exclusively focused on monetization coaching, payout maximization, or similar • It is automated, contains disinformation/misleading claims, is sexually explicit/harmful, or violates X’s rules Core test you must apply to every post: “Would this content still be valuable without this creator’s contribution? Does the primary value come from what they added?” Step 2 — Analyze the account 1. Use available tools to retrieve a representative sample of posts spanning the full past 90 days, preferably using advanced search such as from:username since:YYYY-MM-DD. Aim for at least 40–80 posts when volume is high, distributed across the period. Prioritize standalone posts, threads, quote-posts with substantial text, and media posts. Treat pure low-effort replies as secondary. They only count toward originality if they contain substantial original analysis, insight, or creativity. 2. Classify each post, or clear groups of posts, as: • High Originality: Personal creation or strong, meaningful transformation with clear voice/expertise • Moderate Originality: Solid commentary or analysis that adds clear value • Low / Marginal: Minimal addition, basic reactions, light edits • Non-Original: Copies, pure aggregation, no meaningful contribution 3. Assess regularity and consistency of qualifying original content across the 90 days. Step 3 — Score and report in this exact structure Originality Score: XX/100 Weighted as: • 40% — Percentage of analyzed posts that are High or Moderate Originality • 30% — Consistency / regularity of original posting over the 90 days • 20% — Depth and quality of the value the creator actually adds • 10% — Absence of red-flag patterns, such as heavy aggregation, pure low-effort reactions, exclusive monetization talk, etc. Content Eligibility Verdict: Strongly Eligible (80–100) Likely Eligible (65–79) Borderline (50–64) Not Eligible (<50) Key Findings: Brief stats on post-type breakdown, overall pattern of content creation, and main strengths/weaknesses relative to the official definitions. Concrete Evidence (3–6 recent examples): Quote or closely paraphrase specific posts, including approximate date or post ID/link if available. Classify each and give a short justification tied directly to the official criteria and the “primary value” test. Recommendations: If the score is below 80, give precise, actionable advice on how this specific account can shift its content to reliably meet the “regularly post original content” standard. Be strict on the meaning of “meaningful” transformation, evidence-based, and fair. Base every judgment solely on the official definitions above. Do not factor in follower counts, impressions, Premium status, or any non-content metrics.

FIRST LOOK at Chandler's debut of Arizona’s first Seafood City, a Filipino grocer showcasing thousands of international products from the Philippines, Korea, Thailand, Vietnam, and beyond. It features a live seafood section and a vibrant food hall with concepts like Grill City, Slurp Alley, Yelo Yelo, and more!

INF Pavin Smith cleared waivers and was outrighted to Triple-A Reno.

Consistency. #tuesday #tuesdays #tuesdaymotivation #tuesdayvibe #tuesdayvibes #tuesdaythoughts #tuesdayfeeling #skill #underrated #consistency