@blmihneai
iAccount based inEurope
About this account
- Account based in
- Europe
- Connected via
- Europe App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
💻Crypto since '17 . Suficiente pierderi duc ulterior la castiguri. Postarile nu sunt sfaturi financiare.
Bucharest, Romania
Joined September 2013
- Tweets8.6K
- Following55
- Followers56.4K
- Likes10.4K
Seems the market was indeed preparing for a lesson and is giving out one right now about consensus and crowded trades
Ma mir ca nu au asteptat sa atinga 1000$ ca sa il listeze spot.
Just In: Binance to list Hyperliquid (HYPE) on Sept. 24
Binance will list Hyperliquid (HYPE) on Sept. 24 at 19:00 UTC+8, opening HYPE/USDT, HYPE/USDC and HYPE/TRY spot trading pairs, with deposits starting an hour later and withdrawals expected to open on Sept. 25.
HYPE will carry Binance’s Seed Tag. Hyperliquid is the leading decentralized perpetual-futures exchange by normalized trading volume, with HYPE’s market capitalization at about $21 billion as of Sept. 24.
Rezumatul anului
yeah so basically trump got cocky after succeeding with venezuela and had a hot hand and decided to double down and strike iran in february thinking they could take over the country in a couple of weeks despite everyone telling him it was a bad idea and would drag on
nothing really happened and then Iran learned that they can actually close the strait of hormuz and were unsure if it would even work but now its become obvious they can do it and feel empowered. the iranians have a longer history as a culture and are slow walking trump as much as possible as they know that higher oil prices are going to ruin his odds in the midterms and weaken him
not only that but now higher energy prices are putting upward pressure on inflation and bond yields which has made the job of his new fed chair warsh who came in under a premise of potential rate cute but because of the iran war were entering a rate hiking cycle
the only person in the room who was trying to juggle all of this was scott bessent but after trying to juggle everything for so long he decided he was going to try and fight the bond vigilantes to lower bond yields and declared himself as the house. but he showed up to the bond fight with hardly any ammunition and now the bond market is calling his bluff and now the bond auctions are going terrible and he looks like a fool now
so now bond yields are surging export bans on diesel are being put in place as an act of desparation midterms are a total write off and the trump admin is about to spend the next two years probably fighting impeachment hearings while things continue to detoriorate and the funny thing about all of this is he won the presidency off the idea of no more foreign wars but its his own foreign war with iran that started this whole mess and now the free market is testing them all
I cant remember a time when i saw soo many bearish tweets after bitcoin dropped 2% when its been literally up only for weeks.
Is the market again preparing to teach the crowd a lesson?
Lindy effect in full force for ethereum:native
Flawed or fragile ideas tend to disappear quickly. What survives for a long time has proven its strength against competition and change.
Daca citit ceva astazi atunci cititi asta :
"At the core of this convergence, AI and digital assets both arise from a common foundation: AI represents machine-native intelligence, while digital assets represent machine-native money. This alignment becomes particularly important with the rise of agentic AI, which refers to systems that can plan and execute multistep tasks toward a defined objective by interacting with external tools and infrastructure with limited human intervention, with blockchains providing the programmable infrastructure that connects intelligence with economic activity. These capabilities extend AI beyond content generation toward realworld action, including making purchases and initiating financial transactions
As AI agents become more capable and as their real-world applications expand, they increasingly demand payment and asset infrastructure designed natively for machine-speed commerce. Crypto-native blockchain rails are particularly well suited to high-frequency, sub-cent, machine-to-machine (M2M) transactions that take place around-the-clock, including API calls, on-demand data, and consumptionbased compute. In parallel, modified traditional payment systems will remain important for connecting agents with human-operated businesses and consumers in business-to-machine (B2M) and consumer-tomachine (C2M) settings.
For digital assets, the implications of this growth extend beyond stablecoins to the blockchain networks on which they are issued and settled. Many major stablecoins are issued across multiple blockchains, allowing market participants to select among supported settlement venues based on economics and technical fit. These venues include general-purpose permissionless networks such as Ethereum as well as purpose-built stablecoin networks such as Circle’s Arc, where USDC is designed to serve as the native gas asset. On permissionless networks, native cryptoassets (e.g. ETH) support consensus, validator compensation, transaction fees, and settlement. As stablecoin activity scales, greater demand for blockspace and network services could support usage-related demand and potential value capture for these assets, subject to each network’s fee, staking, and gas-sponsorship design. Arc also offers a complementary model in which greater payment activity could deepen USDC’s utility as both a settlement asset and the means of paying transaction fees."
Link catre research paper: blackrock.com/us/individual/…
Our latest research paper explores the growing connection between AI and digital assets and explains why broad AI adoption may drive new demand, utility and applications across the digital asset economy. blackrock.com/us/individual/…
ethereum:0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 peste 10$ intr-un final
Make ETH great again
🚨BREAKING: Bitcoin Cash $BCH surges to $300, while Uniswap $UNI climbs above $9 after CME confirms futures are scheduled for October 19.
Both BCH and UNI will receive standard and Micro-sized contracts, pending regulatory approval.
The products will offer regulated, 24/7 exposure without requiring traders to hold either token directly.
CME already offers futures tied to BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, LINK, XLM, AVAX and SUI.
What?
EGLD has been totally exposed for its lies & hidden centralization today! ⚠️
3 days of downtime is only the tip of the iceberg: 76M EGLD (2.5x supply) was minted & partially sold!
EGLD did not halt; the foundation used an off-switch!
All consequences of its reckless design! 🧵
Unlike a normal chain halt, where the chain stops due to a "consensus failure/disagreement", this was far, far worse. Instead of the chain stopping because an "inflation bug" caused consensus to fail, it kept going...
That is what allowed the hacker to actually send their EGLD into exchanges & cause considerable harm. What comes next is even more unbelievable. As I was wondering how it was even possible to shut down a chain with 3k validators in 66min...
That is what made me uncover the next bombshell: There is a literal foundation-controlled off-switch in the code!!!
The Off-Switch
Every mainnet node runs with a hard-fork trigger enabled that listens for a message signed by one specific public key. That is a remote stop switch held by the Foundation! We cannot know for sure if they pressed that switch, but it is highly unlikely they could have stopped the chain that quickly otherwise & the fact that it even exists is bad enough!
This is all a direct consequence of the shortcuts they had to make to bring a sharded chain down to 600ms...
Reckless Design
Sharding comes with certain trade-offs: EGLD claimed to overcome these trade-offs through its unique design. Turns out, in reality, those trade-offs had some extreme consequences we are feeling now:
EGLD sharding splits every transfer into a sender-shard debit & a destination-shard credit that must be reconciled by hand, & on one path the credit had no debit: a money printer. With no global supply invariant, finality before execution, & no protocol-level freeze, the only fix was manually shutting down the chain & a hard fork erasing the "final" history!
Lack of Disclosure
Given what I just explained, you can judge for yourself whether the team's disclosure is adequate. I argue it absolutely was not. The fourth screenshot shows their communication on the matter so far & exactly what they failed to mention
Including the mint, the hackers' success & the off-switch!
The fact that it took my own chain & code analysis to reach these conclusions tells us the team cared more about minimizing PR damage than properly disclosing the incident. At least with this piece out, they will not be able to get away with that anymore & will have to also include this information in their report
The community deserves to know what is really going on, how centralized EGLD really is & how the tech is not a magical panacea but instead comes with serious trade-offs
Chain Analysis
The record is clear, all on a public chain for all to see. The attacker exploited this vulnerability in the chain & managed to mint 76M EGLD! Over 2.5x the supply! Along with 430M bridged USDC, about 430M bridged USDT & 5,540 bridged WBTC...
The hacker then proceeded to split these into 16 wallet addresses & then send EGLD to multiple exchanges. If we look at the timing of when these exchanges "froze" EGLD, we see that MEXC did not act in time & it perfectly corresponds with very suspicious selling activity on that exchange, which was not even arbitraged out when the full freeze took effect. We cannot tell whether the hacker managed to exit the exchange afterward, but they certainly could have!
Which means the hacker was likely able to walk away with around $1M USD, effectively defrauding the exchange in the proccess, by leveraging this EGLD vulnerability
Please look at the visuals, as they provide all of the supporting evidence that can also be independently verified with publicly available information
Conclusion
This is BTC's 2010 inflation bug & ETH's 2016 DAO's hack rolled into one. That this all happened in 2026 is even more embarrassing
Unlike those historic failures, there was no full disclosure of the problem as it was happening. People deserve to know; we are blowing the lid off this story now!
This is also nothing like SOL's historic downtime, which involved network halts caused by bugs. Something that has happened in over two years. While EGLD managed to beat SOL in total downtime with this single incident!
SOL also never ever had an off switch! The irony & I apologize; some degree of schadenfreude cannot be helped in my situation. As the EGLD community was one of the loudest spreading that false narrative. Turns out it was unknowingly a projection!
The biggest red flag is still the team itself, after my fallout with EGLD last year. The toxicity & dishonesty became too much to bear
This will likely trigger another ad hominem campaign against me, as it did last time & as it did for other influencers/journalists/thinkers. Fortunatly, I am specialized in weathering the storm. While these facts are undeniable & mostly speak for themselves
EGLD certainly has some good technology; we can learn something from everyone. However, what we saw here over the last few days is beyond the pale
That's where the value lies: In also understanding the character of a chain's leadership, especially at an early stage, as even with decentralized governance, bad leadership can still mess it all up!
This is a truly worst-case scenario for a blockchain; there are very few examples of this level of collapse in blockchain history. After such an event, we have to question the competence & the wisdom of the underlying design choices
EGLD's design is flawed & reckless, making centralization trade-offs other chains would never even dream of. All while claiming to be holier-than-thou
It is never too late to change our minds in the face of new evidence; please study the supporting visuals for yourself. The truth cannot be credibly denied
What occurred here is undeniable, while the silence of EGLD's leadership speaks louder than words: 🎓
Avici ofera cashback 20% daca vreti sa va cumparati un Porche cu cardul lor, dar e capped la 10$ :)))))))))))))))
Inca mai au timp sa stearga postarea
Porsche buyers, this one's for you.
20% cashback on Porsche. Forever.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Cashback is capped at $10 per user.
Since the cheapest Porsche currently available is the Macan starting at $65,400, the effective cashback would be 0.015%.
x.com/aadvark89/stat…
porsche.com/usa/models/mac…
Hmm so everybody who has been calling for lower prices and completely missed this pump are now calling for lower prices so that they can get the perfect entry?
I dont know, but it seems the painful road is still up .
The dumps rarely happen when the majority expects them to, especially not when there is a overwhelming majority sidelined.
The more prices go up or move sideways the more fomo the sidelined have to fight and eventually they will capitulate either by force or by own their will, then the market may turn.
In the end id say try to be willing to be wrong especially when the market has proven you wrong time and time again instead of doubling down on the idea of what you want the market to do instead of what the market is doing
Btw im not specifically adressing the dude, but rather the multitude of people who share that view.
🚨 $BTC BIGGEST BULL TRAP IS SET.
3 weeks ago, I warned you about the $82K-$85K pump
Now it’s playing out exactly as I called it.
$85K → $82K → $78K → $72K→ $62K → 90K+
Don’t fall into the whale trap.