You’re not very good at English are you?
The bit you made up is where you said I thought it was about hurt feelings. Only you mentioned it being about hurt feelings. Have a look through the thread. You really did make it up!
It isn’t hurt feelings. You’ve made that bit up.
It’s fear of immediate and unlawful violence.
You’re not very good with the English language are you?
Learn about uk law before making yourself look like an idiot again.
I haven’t mentioned punching even once.
You’ve brought that in because you don’t understand the definition of s39 assault.
Putting a person in fear of immediate unlawful violence.
You’re thinking of ‘battery.’
Mainly because you’re a bit dim.
I taught the definitions of law and the application of it for a long time.
You’re projecting with the parroting bit. You know very little about law.
How did he get convicted if it wasn’t an assault?
You’re thinking of ‘battery.’
Mainly because you’re stupid?
You can’t even spell it properly you dumb fucker.
Assaults have several levels of seriousness.
Section 39 is also known as common assault. It’s very much an assault.
How can a person be convicted of something you claim isn’t real?
Role of police is irrelevant. Stay on topic.
S39 and s47 are both assaults.
Only a fucking idiot would try to deny that they’re not assaults.
You’re an idiot aren’t you?
You’re lying when you say he didn’t assault a female.
If he didn’t, why did he get convicted of assaulting the female?
Replying to @btbsoco @liamtuffs1
The grift is now Christian cosplay.
Does your god allow lying?
He’s said he did it for the experience, not for religious purposes.
He’s cosplaying for the grift.
Real Christian’s should be angry at his actions.

