Legal and regulatory data infrastructure for agents
SFO/NYC/BLR
Joined July 2025
- Tweets207
- Following2
- Followers13
- Likes3
Pinned Tweet
1/ Introducing Carver ELI: Executable Legal Infrastructure for AI agents.
Give it a PRD. Get back the law that applies, the obligation it creates, and what it costs if you get it wrong.
#AIAgents #LegalTech #RegTech #AIGovernance #ComplianceAI
An HR agent can follow the law perfectly and still fail your employee.
Legal is the floor, not the finish line. Agents also need policy, culture and purpose.
New article by Kerri O'Neill & Dr. Venkata Pingali 👇
carveragents.ai/blog/law-pol…
#AIAgents #AIGovernance #HR
Is your AI agent legal?
There's no simple yes or no. It depends on what the agent does, where it operates, and who it affects.
Here's a 10-question checklist to test yours before launch:
carveragents.ai/blog/is-my-a…
#AIAgents #AIGovernance #LegalTech
Carver Agents retweeted
Check out my latest article: A Company With No One Inside It
linkedin.com/pulse/company-o… via @LinkedIn
Carver Agents retweeted
@prodfieldnotes and me put some thoughts together on evolving role of PM. We will expand on them in future.
AI agents change the PM job in one important way:
You’re not shipping software that only answers.
You’re shipping software that can act.
So “is the model accurate?” is no longer enough.
5 questions PMs should ask before giving an agent authority. 🧵
cc @pingali @carveragents
Carver Agents retweeted
[Carver Conversations] If autonomous agents are going to take irreversible actions with major consequences - like cybersecurity agents launching counterattacks - how should those decisions be made?
And what does human experience tell us about what we need to build into agents for their “moment of truth”?
I spoke with Dr. Doran Avital (@da64 ), founder of PolygonEyes AI, about decision-making under uncertainty, why rulebooks fail, and how generals and elite athletes prepare for the moment when the decision actually has to be made.
Clip below. Full episode in comments.
@carveragents
#AutonomousAgents #AIGovernance #AI
8/ Compliance tooling, governance frameworks, and security certifications all do real work.
They just weren't built for the legal aspects of something that ships weekly, serves five jurisdictions from one web form, and is now operating in areas like hiring and lending where the rules took a hundred years to settle.
Glad to be announcing our partnership with @CarbonArcAI . Looking forward to serving global regulatory intelligence needs of customers in trading, supply chain, cross-border legal, and other domains!
Today, we're excited to welcome Carver Agents to the Carbon Arc ecosystem, bringing structure to something most organizations still track one press release at a time: regulatory risk, everywhere it's building.
Carver Agents tracks regulatory notifications from 1,000+ regulators across 50+ countries, spanning finance, AI, data, energy, healthcare and more. It pulls official government bodies, press releases and enforcement actions, then turns each one into structured fields: source and jurisdiction, key dates, named entities, the functions and industries impacted, the actions they trigger, and more.
For teams whose risk crosses borders, that structure becomes real signal:
• Trade surveillance teams can spot jurisdictions where enforcement is accelerating before it shows up in a filing
• Supply chain teams can see where data, energy or environmental rules are tightening before they disrupt a build
• M&A teams can screen cross-border targets for regulatory exposure they'd otherwise catch too late
• PE and project teams can track how regulatory pressure is shifting in a sector before it changes the math on a deal
If you're managing cross-border risk, in trade, supply chains, M&A or project finance, this is a new lens worth having. Reach out to learn more: carbonarc.ai/contact-us
Carver Agents retweeted
Prep for steep rise in Insurance premiums! I recently learnt that insurance for AI applications is expected to cost 2-5× of existing cyber cover. I dug into how that liability is actually being sized and how the premium are getting set.
Carver Agents retweeted
It is natural that we ask for accountability from the machines that act on our behalf. We are building the regulatory data stack for agents to ensure thatnit is aware of and tested for obligations. Talk to us
The insurance industry has priced the AI risk.
Carriers went to state regulators this year asking to exclude AI-related damages from ordinary general liability policies.
Regulators approved more than 80% of those requests, and the standard forms behind roughly 82% of American property and casualty coverage now carry a generative AI exclusion that gets attached at renewal.
Underwriters are telling you they can't price a loss they can't inspect or audit .
This is the same problem all large enterprises have with examiners, regulators or auditors when they ask “Show me what happened and demonstrate that your controls actually worked.”
Imagine a bank builds an AI agent. The agent makes a decision that causes a $20M loss. The bank asks the insurer to cover it.
The bank’s insurer asks:
What exactly happened? Which model was running? What information did it receive? What tools did it invoke? What actions did it take? What rules constrained it? Was a human involved? Can you reproduce the sequence?
If the answer is essentially “we don’t know - the model made the decision”, the bank has a nightmare and the insurer will balk. It can’t determine causality, negligence, controls, or even whether the same thing could happen tomorrow.
But suppose the software has an immutable audit trail:
Prompt → context → model → reasoning/action path → tool calls → data accessed → permissions → output → human approvals → final action
Now the loss is inspectable. An insurer can underwrite it much more like conventional operational risk.
Software that keeps a traceable record of what it did and why is how a regulated business answers these questions.
This is the part we build: bit.ly/4za1VH0
Carver Agents retweeted
@16z GP is saying AI-proof ≈ embed yourself in the regulated, liability-bearing, operationally messy parts of the value chain that pure model companies rationally avoid. Carver monitors regulators across the world, and is building regulatory data infrastructure for agents. Talk to us.
Carver Agents retweeted
1/ You Have to Tell People It's a Robot.
You might get sued. Here is a simple action to take.
In January, Kentucky's AG sued Character.AI. The claim: the company didn't tell users, especially kids, what they were really talking to.
Kentucky has no chatbot law. This was filed under the state's regular consumer protection statute.
You don't need a new AI law to get sued for this.
#AICompliance #AIRegulation #AIAgents #LegalTech #SOC2
