Christopher Law retweeted
Did Hakeem Jeffries ever reveal specifics of his secret meeting with Jared Kushner hashing out a plan for “affordability”? What’s the latest on that mysterious Grand Bargain
Christopher Law retweeted
Now that the GOP literally has to start over, I wonder if social conservatives will try to establish a role again.
Maybe they’d have done better if the party weren’t associated with gambling apps, a President fixated on male bodies, big donors with multiple divorces etc.
Christopher Law retweeted
アメリカ民主的社会主義者(DSA)が、中間選挙で躍進勝利! 心から祝意を送ります。
「US戦争マシンを終わらせる」ことを綱領に明記し、外国からの米軍基地の縮小撤去を求める勢力。沖縄の米軍基地を調査し、辺野古新基地建設反対の立場で示している。
その綱領の冒頭には、「資本主義のない未来で、仕事を休む1日を想像してみてください」という大胆かつ新鮮な呼びかけ。
どういう議論を経て作られたのか、
アメリカの激動の幕開けか。日本でも「こんな政治にもう我慢ならない」という怒りの世論を起こしていきたい。
Christopher Law retweeted
This outperformance talking point ignores the avalanche of bigotry that Abdul had to run against, not to mention the constant efforts by leading figures in his own party (including this person) to ratfuck his campaign. Anyway, my condolences on his victory.
Replying to @O__V__P
I am glad Abdul won but Talarico and cooper outperformed him in more conservative states. And Abdul won in part because Slotkin, Whitmer and kind of the normies - Obama - campaigned for him. These are facts. This was a normie election. But I am very very glad he won
Christopher Law retweeted
This is what all the State Legislatures are looking like.
Dems now have the power to pass the National Voter Compact to effectively abolish the Electoral College.
lets put JD Vance in jail
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Christopher Law retweeted
why is the texas senator more progressive than most blue dogs in purple house districts? talarico should now the baseline for the party. god is nonbinary baby! everyone get more socialist now!!!!!!
Christopher Law retweeted
This contentious interchange between the NY Times and @GinaHinojosaTX was truly amazing. Hinojosa offered one of the best explanations of populism I've ever seen. Her comments were a total rejection of Corporate Dems' neoliberal formula. Her Texas victory is a game changer.
Christopher Law retweeted
lol it’s hard to think it anyone less well suited to a position of leadership in this moment



























