Oaker retweeted
I love BRC-100 and the new BSV stack. I've shipped several live products on it, real users, real sats, every day. The primitives are the best in crypto.
But the complexity isn't encapsulated yet. Reorgs, mempool rules, what a tx status means, a wallet's coins drifting from the chain, and limits we're putting on users that they never see until something breaks. Every app dev meets all of it in production, alone.
That's not a knock on the builders. They fix what you bring them,... fast. The hard part is that nobody has tried to put their hands around the whole thing yet. There's no way to reproduce every edge case fast and cheaply, so each one gets found in production, once per team.
Other chains closed this gap with worse primitives and more hands. We can close it with better primitives and fewer, if the machine gets written down once so humans and agents can build on it and test against it.
I'm going to do that. All of it if I have to.
Interested in how?
Interested in ways you can help?
Interested in increasing the productivity and efficiency of your team by 100x?
Don't reply. Call me.
No excuses. BRC-100 should be the best in the world.
The Wallet Situation in $BSV Is Catastrophic
The wallet situation in $BSV is catastrophic.
I enjoy software testing. I understand the average Bob and Alice, and I can talk to devs and grasp most of what they’re telling me.
I walk in public every day, watch how people behave, and analyze it.
The problem in $BSV is not only funding to maintain and develop the good stuff. It’s not only the constant sabotage we feel.
The big problem is that we have so many tech-driven people – geeks, nerds – who cannot speak the language of a normal person. They don’t understand how a 72-year-old grandma thinks, or a 55-year-old father of five working in a factory, or a 17-year-old kid getting bullied at school.
A non-techie speaks differently than you, thinks differently than you. Your software should speak to them the same way it speaks to a dev.
I have recovered funds for many of you from lost or unsupported wallets. I have tested several wallets for UI and UX. I test how simple it is to download, install, upgrade, and use them. And I have to say: we are not there. Not even close to a global adoption scenario. And adoption will come.
I know there will be solutions, but @RodSirloin’s question is not only legit. It is necessary.
The $BSV community is not the average Joe. If you want to onboard people to blockchain, you do not get them to understand private keys, UTXOs, legacy addresses, and all that stuff overnight. But adoption will happen faster than that. You need software that runs on intuition and simplicity, without requiring an advanced technical background. Many of you never think about that at all in your tech bubble, in my opinion.
The wallet I recommend to everyone I onboard is @handcashapp.
Because it is the only $BSV wallet that uses UI and UX in the best way for people who use daily apps like Spotify, online banking, WhatsApp, and more.
You want a BSV wallet app where you build apps? Fine.
You want high advanced air-gap security, 3-of-5 private key split-signing vault Electrum? Totally cool.
You want seed backups, non-custodial security features? I get you. But you are 0.01%, and you don’t even realize it.
The world outside of blockchain is different from us, different from TypeScript, Python, vibe coding, etc.
The majority of people give up 30–60 seconds after something in your app doesn’t work. And they have every right to do so. Time is precious.
And you know what? It is not the customer’s responsibility to make it work. It is your responsibility as developers to meet people where they are, not where your supercomputer brains think is smart, or where they “might” be.
Reality is a highly complex concept. It is necessary to zoom out to a meta perspective and feel people’s skills, behavior, and daily challenges before you build something that overwhelms them.
I tested:
SimplyCash
RockWallet
Handcash
FireSats
DotWallet
ElectrumSV / SVP
Exodus
Guarda
Centbee
Atomic Wallet
Yours Wallet
Coinomi
Ledger
…and more.
I already said I recovered funds for many users here in private calls, made tutorials for some, and know the problems.
Most of the problems – 96% – cannot even be solved by the users themselves. That alone tells you all you need to know.
A BRC-100 upgrade that makes your seed invalid because you need an additional database?
A fee bug that doesn’t let you send funds out of the wallet?
A Silicon vs. Intel chipset missed communication not supported in your version? Mac, Linux, Windows compatibilities?
It doesn’t matter. The only thing that matters is: it needs to be easy, it needs to be fast, and it needs to be intuitive.
I feel like I’ve migrated more wallets than most of you even downloaded.
Cloud-based, Desktop, Mobile, hardware wallet, paper wallet – I don’t care.
There are tons of people with different needs, but we are talking about the 98% now, and they all need the same thing:
Software that runs instantly, without extra steps
Software that gives them an existential behavior experience, something they know intuitively
Where they don’t have to do a master’s degree before downloading
Next time you start an app, a project, or anything you want to build, ask not only – I recommend asking not only:
“How can I get this to work?”
Ask:
“How would Veronica, who has never used a blockchain before in her life, use this, get along, and feel during this process?”
And I know that is not an easy process. All I do is making awareness.
UI and UX are more important than many of you think when it comes to using a software. Because it triggers the base psychologial patterns of a human being. Global adoption is tied to that more then to tech itself.
Oaker retweeted
WHAT HAPPENED TO BSV?
Most people know the first half of the answer.
Far fewer have looked at the second.
In 2024, the High Court rejected Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto. The ruling landed on a network already carrying years of conflict, reputational damage and steep price decline.
That is part of the record. This is not an attempt to minimize or relitigate it.
But a judgment about one person was never a judgment on everything other people would build.
Look at just the past two weeks:
A small robot accepted 100 satoshis per command, verified each payment itself in 81 milliseconds, then moved. Every direction had its own on-chain transaction. The entire night of testing cost about three cents. It was built in one evening on BRC-105.
HandCash publicly asked whether it should release a BRC-100 wallet, then previewed an open-source, peer-to-peer, BRC-compliant self-hosted wallet. Wallet interoperability is moving from a specification toward competing implementations.
BSV Browser v1.5.6 reached Android, putting user-held keys, identity and micropayments inside an open-source, vendor-neutral browser. Independently, another developer built a BRC-100 wallet dashboard with per-application spending budgets.
A public risk review of BRC-100 prompted a detailed technical exchange. An overstated claim was acknowledged and corrected, the guidance was revised, and the remaining risks stayed open for debate.
That last example matters as much as the products do. Healthy engineering is not the absence of criticism. It is criticism producing better specifications, clearer responsibilities and stronger implementations.
None of this proves BSV has “won.”
It does not erase past mistakes, guarantee adoption or exempt anyone’s work from hard questions.
It proves something narrower—and more useful:
The correct tense is not “died.”
BSV today is a live builder experiment around a specific thesis: keep the base protocol stable enough to reduce repeated political fights, publish open standards above it, encourage independent implementations, and judge the result by reliability, developer experience, adoption and user value.
That is not a claim to moral superiority. It is a design choice. It should be evaluated by what it produces.
Adam is right about one narrow point: consensus determines what a network accepts.
But that is different from permission to experiment. Different groups can test different ideas. Developers, users, miners and markets ultimately decide what earns a future.
So, what happened to BSV?
A public identity story collapsed.
Price and reputation took heavy damage.
The builders kept going.
And lately, their work has become much harder to dismiss without first looking at it.
You do not have to approve of BSV. You do not have to agree with its design choices.
Just update the record.
Remember when Bitcoin did not need permission?
The builders remember.
Recent work and primary sources:
Court judgment:
judiciary.uk/judgments/copa-…
BRC-105 robotic-car demonstration:
nitter.cf/71Nous/status/20815053…
HandCash and BRC-100:
nitter.cf/handcashapp/status/208…
nitter.cf/handcashapp/status/208…
BSV Browser release:
nitter.cf/deggen/status/20840846…
Independent BRC-100 wallet dashboard:
nitter.cf/hbgnostic/status/20850…
Public risk review and revised guidance:
nitter.cf/BitcoinSvGuide/status/…
Open application stack:
github.com/bsv-blockchain/ts…
Oaker retweeted
I can't imagine either Epstein or any of his friends or clients would ever want BSV. BSV doesn’t allow you to make things vanish. You can’t “accidentally” lose client lists, you can’t pretend transactions never happened, and you can’t route things through ephemeral shadows and call it privacy. BSV keeps a record. Permanently. Indelibly. If a single entry surfaces, the entire network of transactions can be traced. That’s what terrifies them. With BTC and Lightning, the whole idea is plausible deniability. Vanish when convenient. Hide behind layers. But BSV? It doesn’t let you run. You can obscure the view for a moment, but the trail’s always there, waiting. That’s why they don’t want it. That’s why they attack it. Because BSV ends the era of silence bought with dirty money.
Oaker retweeted
some bsv-mcp updates:
- No longer requires a private key to use it (just wont load tools that need a key unless you provide one)
- new MCP prompts and resource templates
- some new env options
- better docs
- changelog available as an mcp resource
github.com/b-open-io/bsv-mcp
Oaker retweeted
It may not matter if Craig Wright created Bitcoin. The real question is whether the nearly 4,000 patents he controls or has pending will force computer programmers around the world to stop using open-source software as they now do—or pay up. trib.al/BTTAUED
Oaker retweeted
nostr并不比电子邮件协议先进,我不知道为什么那么多人为之兴奋。因为无门槛?nostr这种无门槛社交网络最终会因为垃圾消息沦为无人打扫的公共厕所。电子邮件协议是因为低频才得意存续,而高频场景中采用clients+relays方案会使整个网络不堪重负,大量重复消息造成更多浪费,却换不来任何价值。
Oaker retweeted
Retweet if you think Craig Wright is Satoshi and the creator of #Bitcoin and BSV is Bitcoin
youtu.be/3MJSEGnpgB8
#CSWisSatoshi
Oaker retweeted
To celebrate BSV's ATH, I will be selecting a random individual that retweets and follows to be the recipient of 1 BSV in 24 hours.
#BitcoinSV The original Protocol back in action.
Instant payments, scalable infrastructure.
NOTE: Throw away accounts will be ignored.
Oaker retweeted
Get paid to share! This is my “year in review” with the creators and guests of CoinGeek Conversations.
1: Click the article and read/watch: tpow.app/3c805777
2: Retweet this.
3: Drop your HandCash handle in the comments.
4: Get paid.
Oaker retweeted
**GIVE-AWAY**
Drop your HandCash handle, retweet this tweet and make sure you’re following me.
Gonna send out another bunch of weekend #bitcoin #PewPew.
But I also want you to read this article, so we all know what we’re up against: tpow.app/25c89533
Oaker retweeted
I am very very happy to see criminals attacking Craig going to jail - BitMEX founders indicted on criminal charges, sued by US regulator - CoinGeek coingeek.com/bitmex-founders…
Oaker retweeted
Alright! Just finished the #BSVHackathon pitch at #CGLive!
To celebrate, Kyrt sends everyone who retweets this an automated micropayment of 150.000 satoshis!
Don't forget to add your paymail or $handle to your bio.
Oaker retweeted
Dear @YoursOrg - please add open graph and twitter cards meta tags so the links show up with a preview. I think it will drastically improve click through rates to each article!
Oaker retweeted
.@Bitcoin's account has been restricted, likely due to anti-BCH trolls triggering an automated response. Please RT this to bring to @TwitterSupport's attention.
Oaker retweeted
Replying to @lunardragon420
Amir bitcoin and even #bitcoincash are making a real difference now. @paxful @anthemhayek and l @ProfFaustus have all donated to @zamzamwaterorg and real change is happening lambos and schools in africa being built
Oaker retweeted
#CoinEx Countdown Lucky Draw Begins NOW!
Retweet to share FREE #BCH
1k RT = 1 FREE LTC for 10
3k RT = 1 FREE DASH for 10
5k RT = 1 FREE BCH for 100
We will announce the winners when the site is online!
For more update, please subscribe via Email here: coinex.com/
Oaker retweeted
這47張照片紀錄下昨天日本大地震的殺傷力。#prayforjapan http://fb.me/NExDmP7e





























