cryptohokio retweeted
Sonic Labs taps Frax infrastructure for native network stablecoin theblock.co/post/392860/soni…
cryptohokio retweeted
"We're able to capture this price discrepancy before an external bot...[and] redistribute it back to our users..."
@cryptohamm explains how MEV is internalized on @ShadowOnSonic, ensuring value ultimately flows back to liquidity providers.
👇
cryptohokio retweeted
In early November 2025, @beets_fi experienced an exploit.
The Sonic Labs team successfully recovered 5,829,196 S and has now fully distributed the funds proportionally to all affected users.
A full breakdown can be found here: github.com/0xsoniclabs/beets…
Labs has made many mistakes over the past few years, but this is not one of them. One of the reasons I’ve stuck with FTM/Sonic since its ICO (along with many others) is that it stood by its community—though admittedly, over the last 6–8 months, that hasn’t always been the case.
When protocols stand with their communities, they can withstand bad times—especially during down market periods. I truly believe Sonic can survive if it returns to its community-first roots (users and devs). These updates are a great step in the right direction, and I really appreciate the team being transparent here.
Great update—please read the details. Hopefully, the next update on the Multichain saga will be the disbursement of the funds. Imagine the green candle that day. 🙂
It’s good to see the labs continuing to provide clarity on topics that were previously uncertain for the community. Transparency is always welcome and much needed for Sonic holders and the broader space. I’m personally looking forward to the treasury update, along with many others. I appreciate Mitch for moving in the right direction—let’s keep pushing forward.
Transparency Update on Sonic Labs' DAT.
@sonic_strategy, a publicly listed company on the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE), is being built as a regulated bridge to the Sonic ecosystem, giving traditional investors compliant exposure without wallets, private keys, on-chain interaction, or complex tax reporting.
🧵
cryptohokio retweeted
fantom to sonic migration required manual bridging through sonic gateway. binance delisted ftm 11 days after migration opened without confirming s token listing. traders faced three options: hold through delisting, pay gas to manually migrate, or dump immediately. 97% chose dump. binance held 25-30% of supply. no exchange coordination before rebrand announcement meant instant death spiral to $0.078 from $3.46 peak. operational incompetence, not tech failure.
cryptohokio retweeted
sonic labs pays developers 15-90% of network fees. 230 apps already earned $2.3m despite the token down 75% from peak. transactions grew 101% during the november crisis when binance delisted ftm. #7 in global blockchain mindshare but trading at $0.078. developers getting paid to build on a chain everyone thinks is dead
Good to see some clarity from the Labs. In the current environment, pursuing DAT is not a viable strategy.
Still however no clarity on the following though:
• $400M demand that was supposed to be executed before year-end? Or was it just noise to keep the community happy to authorise mint?
• Why set $0.5? Why this price level is a good marker for institutional demand? Price can’t be metric for this, makes no sense.
Personal view: retail users have to come first before any real institutional demand shows up. Sonic isn’t mature enough yet for DAT — even the core Sonic strategy is struggling in this climate. Haven’t seen any major investment.
Team should focus on rebuilding the retail base first. Institutional push won’t work right now. US regulation is shifting towards allowing investors easier spot holdings anyway; this investment vehicle is outdated and very niche demand.
