populist libertarian retweeted
Replying to @mcsquared34
Americans have agency. The government doesn’t need to control healthcare, it needs to create rules that allow competition.
Governors in 34 states do not allow competition. Want to build a hospital? You have to ask the legislature in Minnesota. It has to pass by 85%. Minnesota has less hospital beds than it did in 1981.
Attorneys General are responsible for regulating non profits. Non profit health systems place patients in the highest acuity settings to drive the highest payments.
There is no need for government to be in healthcare. They need to be the referee and then get out of the way.
We know the leverage to pull to create an equitable and lower priced system, we are forbidden.
populist libertarian retweeted
This is deceptively simple framing.
But think about what he’s really saying.
Instead of giving you the option of paying for the private insurance of your choice, the government will take your money and give you government healthcare, which they insist will be just as good as your private care.
Except it won’t. They will launder that money to political allies and give you far worse services than you previously had.
Imagine if someone said you wouldn’t need to pay for food anymore. The government will just increase your taxes equivalent to what you pay for food.
But then you have to get your food from a government grocery store and abide by government rules on quantity and quality of that food.
You are no longer allowed to just take your money to your favored grocery store and get the food you want.
Sure, you’re spending approximately the same amount, but you have to wait in huge lines and the quality is trash.
Nobody would take that deal. We know it ends in disaster.
So why would we take that deal for healthcare?
He gets it
You chose 1973 as your baseline. Let me tell you what happened in 1973.
The dollar fully floated after Nixon severed gold. The first Pell Grants were awarded. The HMO Act was signed. Your chart does not start before the crisis, Bernie. It starts at the scene of the crime.
Healthcare up 35x because Medicare, CON laws, and the AMA cartel run medicine.
Homes up 13x because zoning makes building illegal and the Fed prints.
Rent up 15x because price controls and zoning strangle supply.
Tuition up 23x because federal loans gave colleges a blank check.
General prices rose 7x in that span. Everything government controls rose 13x to 35x. Everything it leaves alone got cheaper.
You are not the prosecutor of this case. You are the defendant.
populist libertarian retweeted
I never really hear anyone talking about how the dollar being the world reserve currency necessarily means that domestic manufacturing will decline over time, so I'll explain it here:
Imagine gold was still the money used all over the world for international trade and that every gold mine in the entire world was located in Australia:
• Australia would have far more gold per capita than any other country, meaning local prices for goods and services would be higher than everywhere else b/c there would just be more gold to go around.
• Thus, other countries would be generally working with lower prices in gold, meaning goods manufactured in that country would demand a lower gold price.
• Due to this discrepancy, any goods produced as efficiently in other countries would still be cheaper for Australians to import than to produce domestically.
• Over time, any manufacturing would gradually phase out in Australia as what remains profitable there--aside from gold mining--is services, since those generally cannot be imported.
• In turn, Australia's primary export would be gold since it would be desired for all international trade.
This is what has hollowed out manufacturing in the US. Ever since the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944, the dollar has been the world's reserve currency. It is the primary currency of international trade and thus the most widely-accepted currency in the world. As manufacturing capabilities have increased across the world, we increasingly trade green paper for goods. We get those goods on the cheap because dollars are harder to come by abroad than domestically.
You can also see this effect at a smaller scale in places like the UAE where they are able to import vast sums of wealth per capita into the desert because they have enormous oil reserves, and oil is as close to being money as any commodity gets these days. They don't have to create their own wealth domestically because the can export oil for dollars and then use those dollars on imports. Dubai does have some manufacturing, but that's not what built one of the most impressive city skylines in the world in the middle of the desert.
It ultimately comes down to supply & demand, which applies to money the same way it applies to everything else. We have a higher supply of dollars because they are created here, and so it is cheaper to buy goods from locations where the supply of dollars is lower.
Tariffs aren't the solution because free trade isn't the problem.
This is why the federal minimum wage should be abolished.
Leave it up to the States and localities.
Replying to @mcuban @NashSpaceBroker
populist libertarian retweeted
first they came for the billionaires
but i said nothing, for i was not a billionaire
then they came for the centimillionaires
A referendum for a new development model
To clarify its own stance and unite its ranks, the left must propose a referendum to adopt a national solidarity tax targeting billionaires and centimillionaires
thomaspiketty.wordpress.com/…
populist libertarian retweeted
This is why economics is so important. There are actually definitions for these various goods.
National defense and public safety are public goods.
They are non rivalrous. My enjoying the public safety that comes with a strong police and military presence does not diminish anyone else from enjoying it.
They are non excludable. It’s impossible to prevent me from enjoying the public safety that comes with that strong police and military. Once those services are provided, everyone receives them if they pay or if they don’t.
Healthcare does not meet these definitions. A visit to the doctor is both rivalrous and excludable. If the doctor is seeing me, he can’t simultaneously be seeing you. It’s rivalrous. Your consumption of medical resources leaves fewer resources for others. It’s also excludable. Try walking in to a doctors office without an appointment. You won’t get seen.
When something rivalrous and excludable, it’s a private good. It’s most efficiently provided in a private market.
Of course there’s more nuance, such as emergency care and providing a safety net to the poor, but those are the edge cases. Most healthcare is a private good and should be treated as such.
populist libertarian retweeted
The United States Government is a full on grift machine.
Washington has already confiscated trillions from taxpayers.
Then it borrowed trillions more against their children.
Now the national debt is approaching $40 trillion.
Healthcare is still unaffordable.
College is still overpriced.
Housing is still out of reach.
The schools are still failing.
All of these problems are due to government interference.
And the people who produced this disaster now want Elon Musk’s wealth because they swear this next pile of money will finally be spent wisely.
Bullshit.
They already took the money.
They already spent the money.
They already failed.
Stealing another trillion from a man who built companies, factories, satellites, cars, and jobs will not make government competent.
It will only transfer wealth from the people who create it to the people who incinerate it.
Brad, a 5% tax on Elon's trillion net worth would literally pay for free college and trade school for every American.
And with the market's growth, he still would be worth over a trillion dollars!
You don't think that's worth it?
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
5% of $1.2T is $60b. 8m students in BA/BS programs on average pay over $20k/yr, or ~$160b/yr for BA/BS degrees only.
That tax could not cover even half of only US bachelor degree costs for just 1 year, excluding grad, ass., or trade degrees totaling another ~10m students.
nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/i…
bestcolleges.com/research/colle…
populist libertarian retweeted
Don’t worry about Elon becoming rich with his own money.
Worry about politicians becoming rich with your money.
Taxpayer-funded Health Savings Accounts could make almost all healthcare free-market, cash-pay, and affordable for everyone.
"Universal Healthcare" doesn't have to mean single-payer healthcare.
Replying to @RonDeSantis
We need a patient-first funding system that puts control back in the hands of the people instead of large corporations.
Basically the Singapore system with American features
open.substack.com/pub/offlab…
populist libertarian retweeted
On our MAHA journey, we have introduced the following:
100% grass-fed, grass-finished beef ✅
100% beef tallow fries ✅
100% beef tallow tots ✅
Grade A Wisconsin butter ✅
A2 whole milk ✅
Cane-sugar Coca-Cola ✅
Elimination of all microwaves ✅
And we are working on changing our buns!
We are committed to becoming seed-oil free, because we are committed to making fast food the best it can be.
The first $150k in income should not be taxed.
Sales tax, not property tax.
Replying to @HoaryHead1611
Maybe everyone should pay a one time property/sales tax at the time of purchase and just be done with it? 🤷🏻♀️
populist libertarian retweeted
Just make it so the first $100k anyone earns each year is tax free
populist libertarian retweeted
Yes, the United States has the most progressive tax system in the world. The top 1% pay 40% of taxes, the bottom 50% pay 3% of taxes. We can make it even more progressive by zeroing out taxes on the bottom half. It’s a small amount of the total tax revenue but very meaningful to people in this group.